A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Frequency Response of the Ear



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old May 28th 09, 12:59 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,151
Default Frequency Response of the Ear


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article
, Arny
Krueger wrote:
Iain held some kind of administrative position within
the recording industry that infrequently got his name in
the credits sections of a few albums. But, when it comes
to choosing, cabling and positioning recording
equipment, listening, and adjusting knobs until things
sound right, Iain has never ever been allowed by anybody
with brains to even try. And, he's lacked the curiosity
and initiative it would to ever try it on his own.
Compared to Iain, Keith is a technical genius.



I make no claims about 'technical ability'* but if I were you and had
'Domine Pt2' floating about the ether I'd keep very quiet about it,
especially after so much bragging about all the 'pro recording' I'd done,
over the last few decades.

Here, you don't need to hear it (you really don't - it sounds like it was
recorded over the phone) - a quick *look* at it will tell you all you need
to know:

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/Recording%20Image1.jpg

(Just *seeing* that has you reaching for the Balance knob, don't it? :-)


*I have had no 'technical' training, education or work experience in
electronics whatsoever, but it didn't stop me building 2 valve amps, a 3 box
valve phono stage and half a dozen pairs of speakers, though....

  #2 (permalink)  
Old May 28th 09, 02:06 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Iain Churches[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,648
Default Frequency Response of the Ear


"Keith G" wrote in message
...

I make no claims about 'technical ability'* but if I were you and had
'Domine Pt2' floating about the ether I'd keep very quiet about it,
especially after so much bragging about all the 'pro recording' I'd done,
over the last few decades.

Here, you don't need to hear it (you really don't - it sounds like it was
recorded over the phone) - a quick *look* at it will tell you all you need
to know:

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/Recording%20Image1.jpg

(Just *seeing* that has you reaching for the Balance knob, don't it? :-)



Keith. Have you listened to the track in question?
It *must* be a hoax!!!

Even dear old Arny couldn't make a pig's ear
of such a simple job (particular when he has
done it 1 000 times befo-)

Iain


  #3 (permalink)  
Old May 29th 09, 11:23 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Arny Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,850
Default Frequency Response of the Ear

"Keith G" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article
, Arny
Krueger wrote:
Iain held some kind of administrative position within
the recording industry that infrequently got his name
in the credits sections of a few albums. But, when it
comes to choosing, cabling and positioning recording
equipment, listening, and adjusting knobs until things
sound right, Iain has never ever been allowed by
anybody with brains to even try. And, he's lacked the
curiosity and initiative it would to ever try it on
his own. Compared to Iain, Keith is a technical genius.


I make no claims about 'technical ability'* but if I were
you and had 'Domine Pt2' floating about the ether I'd
keep very quiet about it, especially after so much
bragging about all the 'pro recording' I'd done, over the
last few decades.


Trust me, those recordings were well-received by the people who paid for
them. They were looking for a certain sound and they've got it. Like it or
not, they were a reasonably accurate representation of the live performance.
A piece of friendly advice - never go to a choir or band festival. It won't
sound like the Philharmonic!

Do I know how to make a more commercial sound? Of course!


  #4 (permalink)  
Old June 1st 09, 10:50 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,151
Default Frequency Response of the Ear


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article
, Arny
Krueger wrote:
Iain held some kind of administrative position within
the recording industry that infrequently got his name
in the credits sections of a few albums. But, when it
comes to choosing, cabling and positioning recording
equipment, listening, and adjusting knobs until things
sound right, Iain has never ever been allowed by
anybody with brains to even try. And, he's lacked the
curiosity and initiative it would to ever try it on
his own. Compared to Iain, Keith is a technical genius.


I make no claims about 'technical ability'* but if I were
you and had 'Domine Pt2' floating about the ether I'd
keep very quiet about it, especially after so much
bragging about all the 'pro recording' I'd done, over the
last few decades.


Trust me, those recordings were well-received by the people who paid for
them. They were looking for a certain sound and they've got it. Like it or
not, they were a reasonably accurate representation of the live
performance. A piece of friendly advice - never go to a choir or band
festival. It won't sound like the Philharmonic!

Do I know how to make a more commercial sound? Of course!



To me, that translates: 'It's crap. I know it's crap; I can do better but
the clowns like it as it is, so why should I bother?

Or am I missing summat...??



  #5 (permalink)  
Old June 8th 09, 06:03 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Iain Churches[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,648
Default Frequency Response of the Ear


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...



Keith wrote:
I make no claims about 'technical ability'* but if I were
you and had 'Domine Pt2' floating about the ether I'd
keep very quiet about it, especially after so much
bragging about all the 'pro recording' I'd done, over the
last few decades.


Trust me, those recordings were well-received by the people who paid for
them.



Paid for them? Yikes! They were robbed!
Disregarding the musical performance, the technical
standard leaves a great deal to be desired, on any level.

Any first year student could surely do better.

If you had been content with the fact that you were
a volunteer recordist at your local church, then I am
sure the material at your link would have been met
with enthusiasm.

But, you claim to be a professional, which takes us
up to a whole new level of expectation. A
professional is hired to produce a professional
result. Tell me honestly, Arny, hand on your
heart, do you think you have done this?

They were looking for a certain sound and they've got it. Like it or not,
they were a reasonably accurate representation of the live performance.


But it sounds nothing like a live performance!
No soundstage, no depth. Thin, brittle and distorted.
Surely no-one was consciously "looking for" that?

A SATB choir recording is one of the simplest projects
one can be asked to do.

Do I know how to make a more commercial sound? Of course!


It would interesting to hear you substantiate that claim..
Please post a link:-)


Iain










 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.