![]() |
Transcriptor Hydraulic Reference on sale at UK
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:53:17 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote: "Don Pearce" wrote Any deck that supports the record on six points can never be described as "right". It is a ridiculous thing to do. The record must sag between the points This is a joke - right? Of course not. How could a flexible plastic record not sag between those suspension points? Remember that we are talking thousandths of an inch to create a big signal, not a sag like a row of bunting. A record needs to be supported over its whole surface, as flat as possible. d |
Transcriptor Hydraulic Reference on sale at UK
"Don Pearce" wrote in message news:4aa8db1e.1466875@localhost... On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:53:17 +0100, "Keith G" wrote: "Don Pearce" wrote Any deck that supports the record on six points can never be described as "right". It is a ridiculous thing to do. The record must sag between the points This is a joke - right? Of course not. How could a flexible plastic record not sag between those suspension points? Stiffness. Remember that we are talking thousandths of an inch to create a big signal, not a sag like a row of bunting. A record needs to be supported over its whole surface, as flat as possible. And yet they are so often not, for one reason or another - without any truly discernable effect on the sound.... |
Transcriptor Hydraulic Reference on sale at UK
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:24:00 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote: "Don Pearce" wrote in message news:4aa8db1e.1466875@localhost... On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:53:17 +0100, "Keith G" wrote: "Don Pearce" wrote Any deck that supports the record on six points can never be described as "right". It is a ridiculous thing to do. The record must sag between the points This is a joke - right? Of course not. How could a flexible plastic record not sag between those suspension points? Stiffness. Hold an LP up balanced on two fingers at opposite edges - you will see how much it sags quite easily. Obviously it doesn't sag as much as that with six suspension points, but it sags much more than enough to generate a huge signal. Remember that we are talking thousandths of an inch to create a big signal, not a sag like a row of bunting. A record needs to be supported over its whole surface, as flat as possible. And yet they are so often not, for one reason or another - without any truly discernable effect on the sound.... You won't hear it, because the frequency is too low, but what it does is create a huge subsonic signal that the preamp has to cope with. That eats into the overload margin, and can result in premature onset of distortion with loud bass notes. So as a piece of engineering, it is ****. Some may consider it pretty, but I'm not among them because I can't separate form from function that easily. If I can see why it is bad, it will not please me aesthetically. d |
Transcriptor Hydraulic Reference on sale at UK
"Don Pearce" wrote in message
news:4aa9e20e.3243421@localhost You won't hear it, because the frequency is too low, but what it does is create a huge subsonic signal that the preamp has to cope with. The flexing also creates wow. I don't know whether or not it is audible given all the other speed variations that are inherent in LP playback, but its there. |
Transcriptor Hydraulic Reference on sale at UK
In article ,
David Looser wrote: It was a triumph of style over function, designed to appeal to those (who are still with us today, of course) to whom what a HiFi system looks like is more important than what it sounds like. In one. The ideal, of course, is something which works well *and* looks good. And you have to admit it does look "special". Yes. I actually have one. Was given it broken. But don't use it. It just looks nice on a shelf. Along with a Nagra. Which does work well. The reason it was broken? It belonged to a mate who was so fed up with the faults in performance I described earlier, that he through it out of a window... -- *How many roads must a man travel down before he admits he is lost? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Transcriptor Hydraulic Reference on sale at UK
Don Pearce said...
Hold an LP up balanced on two fingers at opposite edges - you will see how much it sags quite easily. Obviously it doesn't sag as much as that with six suspension points, but it sags much more than enough to generate a huge signal. The Hydraulic was designed for the thick'n sturdy pre 73 oil crisis discs which are a totally different animal to the later floppies. I got a couple of lp's last week, a Decca ffrr from 1965 and a bog standard EMI Columbia from 1966 and neither droops on your finger tip test, on the contrary significant pressure has to be applied to deform them. -- Ken O'Meara http://www.btinternet.com/~unsteadyken/ |
Transcriptor Hydraulic Reference on sale at UK
In article ,
Keith G wrote: All sounds typically very scary, but my suspicion is that no normal person would be able to tell the difference between a record played directly on the mat/platter/whatever and the same record lifted up on, say, only three bearing points. You certainly will if you wind up the wick. It will feed back. Unless in a well sealed enclosure. It acts beautifully as a diaphragm. -- *Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Transcriptor Hydraulic Reference on sale at UK
In article , UnsteadyKen
wrote: Don Pearce said... Hold an LP up balanced on two fingers at opposite edges - you will see how much it sags quite easily. Obviously it doesn't sag as much as that with six suspension points, but it sags much more than enough to generate a huge signal. The Hydraulic was designed for the thick'n sturdy pre 73 oil crisis discs which are a totally different animal to the later floppies. My unreliable recollection is that many 'pre 73' LPs were far from flat, or even very thick. I got a couple of lp's last week, a Decca ffrr from 1965 and a bog standard EMI Columbia from 1966 and neither droops on your finger tip test, Weird. Most of the pre 73 LPs I have are ones I bought when they first came on sale! :-) However, a sensing system like a stylus might be able to detect variations from flat thay you can't see using your mark 1 eyeballs. So your "neither droops" may simply tell us something about your eyes, not the LP. :-) You could check by holding a straight-edge just above the LP, touching at the suspension points. Then see if daylight floods though the gap. That way you may be able to see a droop which your eyes would otherwise not notice. That said, since most LP sensors are essentially velocity sensitive that might help here given the low frequency of 6-point support at 100/3 rpm. I guess it then depends on the suspension of the cantilever and the response, etc, of the preamp. And with luck the unwanted ripple will be below the arm/cart resonance, not spot-on that value! on the contrary significant pressure has to be applied to deform them. ....to the extent you find visible. I have a vague feeling this topic did feature in a magazine set of measurements a few decades ago. If I can find that sometime I'll let people know. Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Transcriptor Hydraulic Reference on sale at UK
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: All sounds typically very scary, but my suspicion is that no normal person would be able to tell the difference between a record played directly on the mat/platter/whatever and the same record lifted up on, say, only three bearing points. You certainly will if you wind up the wick. It will feed back. Unless in a well sealed enclosure. It acts beautifully as a diaphragm. Well aware (after nearly half a century as a user) that a record deck can act as a transducer but the question is still the is any FB discernable in normal use or even wicked up? I might give it a go later but I notice the mint imperials haven't been opened and I don't like them anyway, so it'll have to be with Tic Tacs... |
Transcriptor Hydraulic Reference on sale at UK
"Keith G" wrote in message ... All sounds typically very scary, but my suspicion is that no normal person would be able to tell the difference between a record played directly on the mat/platter/whatever and the same record lifted up on, say, only three bearing points. Might try it later with mint imperials.... Using the mint imperials will indeed sound dreadful.. Unless of course you use a green marker pen on the edge of each mint prior to placement.. ;-) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk