![]() |
Radio Mics
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:53:23 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: What's he using now? Where's the mic? A cheap system on a boom will sound much better than an expensive one on the lapel. Unless you've got a boom operator (way over the top for a church this size) the boom tethers the pastor, and that's highly counter-productive. You deliberately misunderstand "boom" I think :-) |
Radio Mics
In the church where I am the Res. Engineer, they (not much to my liking,
will rather buy a cheap ZAR600 VHF Wireless Lavalier Microphone that will only last a year before the cable breaks, etc. And that they will just get another cheapie when this one breaks (about every year). as these cheap units run at about 200Mhz, and are NON diversity, they have several problems : 1 Frequent dropouts 2 Constant Hiss (that can be heard on the CD recordings of the service) 3 Amplitude Fluctuations, 4 Even when a ceiling fan is turned on in the Auditorium, the rotational frequency of the 3 Metal blades affects the signal (with the signal and amplitude being affected - chopping type sound.) 5 If the preacher turns so that their body is between the Transmitter, and its associated (Microphone wire) antenna, then dropouts are more frequent 6 With one preacher the Mic will NEVER work with him, Continuous Hiss and Dropouts Every time he uses the Mic (Maybe his underwear causing too much static. I have been recommending to them that they get a Decent (Shure / Akg /Senheisser?) UHF Diversity Lav, but it seems to be above their budget. So, I plead with you, please convince your brother to get a decent UHF Diversity System. P "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... Strange for me to ask such a question but I've simply got no direct experience of this end of the market. My brother is an elder of the kirk and they need a replacement body pack radio mic. Just for the minister. These days they wander round the kirk rather than remaining in the pulpit. ;-) One which you popped into a charger after use would be ideal - it's only used perhaps three times a week for about 2 hours each time, and finding someone with reasonable skills to change batteries on a regular basis isn't that easy. A separate charger would be better than one in the receiver. It also needs to have a convenient way of the minister being able to mute it for hymns - for obvious reasons. Although I'm willing to modify it for that if it isn't possible. The current one he switches off which isn't ideal. Although might be ok when moving to the correct frequency. The current one is VHF. -- *What was the best thing before sliced bread? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Radio Mics
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:31:08 +0200, "Peter Kolbe"
wrote: In the church where I am the Res. Engineer, they (not much to my liking, will rather buy a cheap ZAR600 VHF Wireless Lavalier Microphone that will only last a year before the cable breaks, etc. And that they will just get another cheapie when this one breaks (about every year). as these cheap units run at about 200Mhz, and are NON diversity, they have several problems : 1 Frequent dropouts 2 Constant Hiss (that can be heard on the CD recordings of the service) 3 Amplitude Fluctuations, 4 Even when a ceiling fan is turned on in the Auditorium, the rotational frequency of the 3 Metal blades affects the signal (with the signal and amplitude being affected - chopping type sound.) 5 If the preacher turns so that their body is between the Transmitter, and its associated (Microphone wire) antenna, then dropouts are more frequent 6 With one preacher the Mic will NEVER work with him, Continuous Hiss and Dropouts Every time he uses the Mic (Maybe his underwear causing too much static. I have been recommending to them that they get a Decent (Shure / Akg /Senheisser?) UHF Diversity Lav, but it seems to be above their budget. So, I plead with you, please convince your brother to get a decent UHF Diversity System. Last time I was in a church (about 1960), the charlatan didn't need a microphone. He just spoke up and everybody could hear him dribbling down his chin. Why the **** does this crap have to be recorded? Isn't it bad enough that it gets heard even once? d |
Radio Mics
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:38:53 +0000, Laurence Payne
wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:02:08 GMT, (Don Pearce) wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:31:08 +0200, "Peter Kolbe" wrote: In the church where I am the Res. Engineer, they (not much to my liking, will rather buy a cheap ZAR600 VHF Wireless Lavalier Microphone that will only last a year before the cable breaks, etc. And that they will just get Last time I was in a church (about 1960), the charlatan didn't need a microphone. He just spoke up and everybody could hear him dribbling down his chin. Why the **** does this crap have to be recorded? Isn't it bad enough that it gets heard even once? In case it's needed as evidence. One day a preacher will take a question and give a straight, verifiable answer. Then the whole show collapses. There's an online publication "The God Squad" where a plausible and friendly Jewish minister peddles reassuring platitudes. His response to events in Haiti is a particularly good wriggle: http://www.arcamax.com/ezinesamples/319.html Also, search the archives for the one where he is forced to announce that none of the major religions allow animals to have souls, but wriggles beautifully to avoid upsetting cat-women. Evidence - I never thought of that. But it is probably not needed, these people are so deranged that they are actually prepared to admit to all the things they say. d |
Radio Mics
"Laurence Payne" wrote
There's an online publication "The God Squad" where a plausible and friendly Jewish minister peddles reassuring platitudes. His response to events in Haiti is a particularly good wriggle: http://www.arcamax.com/ezinesamples/319.html Appropriately McAfee "Site Advisor" advises me that that link is "Potentially Unsafe" :-) David. |
Radio Mics
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:21:59 -0000, "David Looser"
wrote: "Laurence Payne" wrote There's an online publication "The God Squad" where a plausible and friendly Jewish minister peddles reassuring platitudes. His response to events in Haiti is a particularly good wriggle: http://www.arcamax.com/ezinesamples/319.html Appropriately McAfee "Site Advisor" advises me that that link is "Potentially Unsafe" :-) David. Only potentially? McAfee is too timid. d |
Radio Mics
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:21:59 -0000, "David Looser"
wrote: "Laurence Payne" wrote There's an online publication "The God Squad" where a plausible and friendly Jewish minister peddles reassuring platitudes. His response to events in Haiti is a particularly good wriggle: http://www.arcamax.com/ezinesamples/319.html Appropriately McAfee "Site Advisor" advises me that that link is "Potentially Unsafe" :-) Actually, the three big religions have a great deal in common, mainly their "hobbies" http://www.soundthoughts.co.uk/look/same.htm d |
Radio Mics
"Dave Plowman (Nutcase)" ** **** off and die - you ridiculous KNOW NOTHING TROLLING bloody pommy RETARD !! FUUCK OFFFF !! ..... Phil |
Radio Mics
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:32:31 +1100, "Phil Allison"
wrote: "Dave Plowman (Nutcase)" ** **** off and die - you ridiculous KNOW NOTHING TROLLING bloody pommy RETARD !! FUUCK OFFFF !! .... Phil Obviously a practicing Christian :-) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk