Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Radio Mics (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/8026-radio-mics.html)

Dave Plowman (News) January 27th 10 11:46 PM

Radio Mics
 
In article ,
Laurence Payne wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:32:31 +1100, "Phil Allison"
wrote:



"Dave Plowman (Nutcase)"


** **** off and die

- you ridiculous KNOW NOTHING

TROLLING bloody pommy RETARD !!

FUUCK OFFFF !!


.... Phil



Obviously a practicing Christian :-)


Who doesn't like to hear the truth. ;-)

--
*'Progress' and 'Change' are not synonyms.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Arny Krueger January 28th 10 12:26 AM

Radio Mics
 
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message

On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:53:23 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

What's he using now? Where's the mic? A cheap system
on a boom will sound much better than an expensive one
on the lapel.


Unless you've got a boom operator (way over the top for
a church this size) the boom tethers the pastor, and
that's highly counter-productive.


You deliberately misunderstand "boom" I think :-)


Since you didn't bother to clarify...



Laurence Payne[_2_] January 28th 10 02:08 AM

Radio Mics
 
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:26:43 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

You deliberately misunderstand "boom" I think :-)


Since you didn't bother to clarify...


Context.

Iain Churches[_2_] January 28th 10 06:07 AM

Radio Mics
 

"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:53:23 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

What's he using now? Where's the mic? A cheap system on
a boom will sound much better than an expensive one on
the lapel.


Unless you've got a boom operator (way over the top for a church this
size)
the boom tethers the pastor, and that's highly counter-productive.


You deliberately misunderstand "boom" I think :-)


Can you imagine a boom operator with
headphones and a fishpole at a church service:-)))






Dave Plowman (News) January 28th 10 08:42 AM

Radio Mics
 
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
Can you imagine a boom operator with
headphones and a fishpole at a church service:-)))


Make up your mind. Either boom or pole. The correct terminology in the UK
is 'pole for a hand held device. A boom is a studio device where the mic
is controlled via effectively remote controls at the other end.
A studio boom op can usually be immediately proficient on a 'pole -
assuming he has the physical strength. The reverse is not the case.
Learning to operate a studio boom well takes a deal of time. Just one of
the many skills needed for TV sound that you know nothing about.

--
*The hardness of the butter is proportional to the softness of the bread *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Iain Churches[_2_] January 28th 10 08:53 AM

Radio Mics
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
Can you imagine a boom operator with
headphones and a fishpole at a church service:-)))


Make up your mind. Either boom or pole.



He's a boom operator, using a fishpole.

The correct terminology in the UK
is 'pole for a hand held device. A boom is a studio device where the mic
is controlled via effectively remote controls at the other end.
A studio boom op can usually be immediately proficient on a 'pole -
assuming he has the physical strength. The reverse is not the case.
Learning to operate a studio boom well takes a deal of time. Just one of
the many skills needed for TV sound that you know nothing about.


Nice to see you have started the New Year in the spirt of goodwill,
Dave:-)





bcoombes January 28th 10 08:56 AM

Radio Mics
 
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
Can you imagine a boom operator with
headphones and a fishpole at a church service:-)))


Make up your mind. Either boom or pole. The correct terminology in the UK
is 'pole for a hand held device. A boom is a studio device where the mic
is controlled via effectively remote controls at the other end.
A studio boom op can usually be immediately proficient on a 'pole -
assuming he has the physical strength. The reverse is not the case.
Learning to operate a studio boom well takes a deal of time. Just one of
the many skills needed for TV sound that you know nothing about.


Whooosh!!!

--
Bill Coombes

Dave Plowman (News) January 28th 10 10:04 AM

Radio Mics
 
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
Can you imagine a boom operator with
headphones and a fishpole at a church service:-)))


Make up your mind. Either boom or pole.



He's a boom operator, using a fishpole.


Only to those who don't know the correct terminology. And that often
includes some in the business. But not those whose job it is. Directors
etc will talk about a boom in shot when it is invariably just the mic. But
you wouldn't expect them to know any better about sound. ;-)

Tell you what Iain, since you love dishing out impossible tasks. Set up a
studio TV prog where you want to use a studio boom, ie a Fisher, and get
what you call a boom operator in to use it. The result would be rather
like expecting a skilled tape editor to be automatically proficient with
ProTools the first time he saw it.

The correct terminology in the UK is 'pole for a hand held device. A
boom is a studio device where the mic is controlled via effectively
remote controls at the other end. A studio boom op can usually be
immediately proficient on a 'pole - assuming he has the physical
strength. The reverse is not the case. Learning to operate a studio
boom well takes a deal of time. Just one of the many skills needed for
TV sound that you know nothing about.


Nice to see you have started the New Year in the spirt of goodwill,
Dave:-)


Just following your lead.

--
*Indian Driver - Smoke signals only*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Dave Plowman (News) January 28th 10 10:07 AM

Radio Mics
 
In article ,
bcoombes bcoombes@orangedotnet wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
Can you imagine a boom operator with
headphones and a fishpole at a church service:-)))


Make up your mind. Either boom or pole. The correct terminology in the
UK is 'pole for a hand held device. A boom is a studio device where
the mic is controlled via effectively remote controls at the other
end. A studio boom op can usually be immediately proficient on a
'pole - assuming he has the physical strength. The reverse is not the
case. Learning to operate a studio boom well takes a deal of time.
Just one of the many skills needed for TV sound that you know nothing
about.


Whooosh!!!


Another Humpty Dumpty. Who thinks words mean just what he wants them to.

Perhaps you forget the recent debate Mr Churches started over the use of
coincident pair? Sauce for the goose...

--
*A day without sunshine is like... night.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Laurence Payne[_2_] January 28th 10 10:21 AM

Radio Mics
 
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:07:26 +0200, "Iain Churches"
wrote:

Can you imagine a boom operator with
headphones and a fishpole at a church service:-)))


Only if a technical volunteer developed extreme delusions of grandeur.
Which, of course, could never happen :-)


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk