"Iain Churches" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article ,
Keith G wrote:

In fact IIRC correrctly - you expound Rode mics do you
not? :-)

Saw them (NT-1 ?) described as being 'strangely
simultaneously peaky yet dull' (or very similar) by
someone, somewhere not long ago - possibly in a Sound
On Sound review...???

If you knew the first thing about using mics, you'd know
they are rarely used 'flat'. One such that hardly ever
is - the u87. One of the industry standards.

Sound on Sound is just a typical comic like Hi-Fi News.

No need to be snowed by Kitty's line of BS and
out-and-out lying. Here's what SOS *really* said:

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may0...les/rodent.htm

That's a fine review......

But one thing bothers me, Arny.
If it is such a good mic, and you use it, why
do you get such poor results?

Iain, the posting of the recording was a red herring all along. If I wanted
to portray you as a mean-spirited, small-minded person who ifs full of
hatred and fear and who holds a grudge indefinately, I couldn't have done a
better job on you than you have done to yourself over this little recording.
;-)

Besides, if you were staying awake Iain, you'd know that I recorded Domine
with a NT-4, not a NT 1a. They are very different microphones!