Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Philips TDA1541A S1 DAC (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/8075-philips-tda1541a-s1-dac.html)

Phil Allison[_2_] March 10th 10 12:56 PM

Dave Plowman = Criminal Scumbag
 

"Dave Plowman = Criminal Scumbag "


** Then there is the use of the SAME word used as a verb or adjective:


Egs: " service technician ", " service workshop " and the phrase
"sales and service" in relation to electronic goods - all of which are
widely used in the UK.


Just because they are widely used doesn't make that use right.



** Totally ****ing stupid and 1000% WRONG.

Just like EVERY single thing this VILE ****WIT ever says.

Get cancer and ****ING die you putrid pile of

PIG IGNORANT POMMY EXCREMENT !!




.... Phil






Phil Allison[_2_] March 10th 10 12:58 PM

Cock Sucking TROLL
 

"David"

** You are nothing but a VILE cock sucking TROLL !!


Live and let live!


Indeed, I was just commenting that Don's original post was correct.



** You are nothing but a VILE cock sucking TROLL !!

Cancer is way too good for genetic defective SCUMBAGS like you.

**** OFF & DIE now !!




..... Phil






Dave Plowman (News) March 10th 10 01:22 PM

Dave Plowman = Criminal Scumbag
 
In article ,
Phil Allison wrote:
** Totally ****ing stupid and 1000% WRONG.


So we can add math to the things you don't understand?

Isn't it nice being lectured on the use of English by a potty mouthed
colonial?

--
*It is easier to get older than it is to get wiser.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

David[_2_] March 10th 10 01:29 PM

Cock Sucking TROLL
 
Indeed Alison Felcher.



Jim Lesurf[_2_] March 10th 10 02:14 PM

Philips TDA1541A S1 DAC
 
In article , Arny
Krueger
wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...
"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message
...

Don, Dave and David are correct.


Strange isn't it, that it's always so called English speakers that are
not English, that think they know better than the English at English.


Let's face it guys. The so-called English language is itself a hybrid of
European languages, some long dead. Nothing pure or well-defined about
it.


You left out all the other inputs to the hybrid. e.g. from the Indian
subcontinental languages. :-)

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html


Don Pearce[_3_] March 10th 10 04:06 PM

Philips TDA1541A S1 DAC
 
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:13:12 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

The idea that 70 million people in the UK are going to define how English
is used by 300 million people in the US can be easily dismissed. We won our
wars of independence from you (at least 3) and never seriously looked back.
Then we saved your sweet selves from your own folly at least twice. And you
want to teach us what???? ;-)


You won? The American war of independence war was fought between
Britain and France - you Americans were barely involved.

And as for the "we saved you" nonsense, no, that won't do at all. The
USA joined both wars on its own terms, and for its own reasons.
"Saving" us was not one of them.

And finally, it is Australian usage, not American that is under
discussion here.

d

David Looser March 10th 10 05:24 PM

Philips TDA1541A S1 DAC
 
"Don Pearce" wrote

And as for the "we saved you" nonsense, no, that won't do at all.


That's part of the "American myth", the idea that the USA was the cavalry
rushing in to save Europe from the Nazis. It is, of course, bunkum.

The
USA joined both wars on its own terms, and for its own reasons.
"Saving" us was not one of them.


To be fair I think it was *one* of them. But principally the USA joined WW2
(almost 2 years late!) because it was, itself, under attack.

And finally, it is Australian usage, not American that is under
discussion here.


Maybe the Americans also say "service" when they mean "repair"? Come to that
what's wrong with the good old-fashioned word "mend"?

David.



Don Pearce[_3_] March 10th 10 05:42 PM

Philips TDA1541A S1 DAC
 
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:24:45 -0000, "David Looser"
wrote:

"Don Pearce" wrote

And as for the "we saved you" nonsense, no, that won't do at all.


That's part of the "American myth", the idea that the USA was the cavalry
rushing in to save Europe from the Nazis. It is, of course, bunkum.

The
USA joined both wars on its own terms, and for its own reasons.
"Saving" us was not one of them.


To be fair I think it was *one* of them. But principally the USA joined WW2
(almost 2 years late!) because it was, itself, under attack.

And finally, it is Australian usage, not American that is under
discussion here.


Maybe the Americans also say "service" when they mean "repair"? Come to that
what's wrong with the good old-fashioned word "mend"?

David.


Mend, fix, make good, set it right, all of them perfectly good
synonyms.

d

Arny Krueger March 10th 10 07:00 PM

Philips TDA1541A S1 DAC
 

"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"Don Pearce" wrote

And as for the "we saved you" nonsense, no, that won't do at all.


That's part of the "American myth", the idea that the USA was the cavalry
rushing in to save Europe from the Nazis. It is, of course, bunkum.


Of course your account is bunkum, because we didn't rush, we acted
deliberately. In the case of WW1 we dragged our feet until they were red and
bleeding. In the case of WW2, we again were dragged kicking and screaming
into the European part of the war.

And, we didn't save you. We helped you save yourself.

The USA joined both wars on its own terms, and for its own reasons.


That comes with being a sovereign nation. In context, a truism.

If we wouldn't have jumped into either war, much of Europe would be under
German control, which seems to have happened anyway... ;-)

"Saving" us was not one of them.


Yup, and similar logic shows that there was no holocaust. ;-)

To be fair I think it was *one* of them. But principally the USA joined
WW2 (almost 2 years late!) because it was, itself, under attack.


The event that tipped the scales was that were under direct attack by Japan
in several places in the Pacific. Then, for some reason Hitler declared war
on us.




Don Pearce[_3_] March 10th 10 07:06 PM

Philips TDA1541A S1 DAC
 
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:00:35 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


If we wouldn't have jumped into either war, much of Europe would be under
German control, which seems to have happened anyway... ;-)


I don't understand your use of the word "wouldn't" in this context. It
is a conditional without benefit of a condition. Do you mean "if we
hadn't"?

d


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk