A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

To reverb or not?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11 (permalink)  
Old December 1st 10, 09:41 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Dave Plowman (News)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,872
Default To reverb or not?

In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
No. It's not a room, but a *very* contrived tape repeat with reverb
added to it. This became part of the very distinctive Bostic R+B
sound.


Using a tape delay to feed a reverb plate was common practice in TV in
the '60s and '70s before digital reverb units become the norm.


The track being discussed here, Earl Bostic's recording of Flamingo was
made in 1951, there were no reverb plates then.


Perhaps then you would explained where the 'reverb' came from?

Before plates, the common way was an 'echo room' with speaker and
microphone. But you've stated it was not a room.

--
*Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.