A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

'Unpostable response 3 of 3



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10 (permalink)  
Old January 29th 11, 10:59 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Eiron[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39
Default 'Unpostable response 3 of 3

On 29/01/2011 10:37, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
Your understanding of the 'Rolex thing' is on a par with your
understanding of 'high end' vinyl replay.


Rather a good comparison. A much cheaper watch can tell the time as well
if not better than a Rolex. In the same way as a decent CD player (with a
well made CD) p***es all over any vinyl system ever made. The difference
is any fool can tell if a watch is accurate or not. There can be no
argument there.


Any fool with an FM radio. DAB and satellite listeners only have a vague
idea of the time.
It's amusing to ask a few people the time. Those with digital watches
are usually least accurate.
At least the mechanical ones are usually set from an accurate source and
wound up each time they are used,
so it doesn't matter if they keep 'Rolex Time' (a phrase used by a
friend who is a watch dealer.)

--
Eiron.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.