In defense of Michael Jackson
 

PD said:

Actually G, castration is classed right up there with torture as "cruel and
unusual punishment".

I don't see how castration could be considered to be any of those
things when you have patient consent.

It's hardly "consent" when the other choice is life in prison.

I didn't describe that circumstance. If a person is found guilty of a
crime, they should serve the time. No doubt a convict can consider
taking various courses of action to moderate their behaviour, which
would be taken into account by the parole board.

Getting back to the main point, I've heard many psychs and shrinks say
what Bruce did, i.e. that pedophilia is "inherited". Same with other
child abuse. If Krooger would just admit he was a victim, maybe the
rest of the world would cut him a break.

In defense of Michael Jackson
 

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:54:43 GMT
"2mb" wrote:

My son will have all of the neighborhood perv photos memorized by the
time he is 6,

WHY? whats the point?

and instructions will be drilled into him on what to do *when* they
try something.

The same rule applies to all strangers. telling him some strangers are
worse than others only weakens the rule as you have muddied the water on
how to apply it. now you have a non-absolute rule.

Try taking a good book on parenting out of the library.

Do you want them around your kids unattended? How about outside of the
neighborhood elementary school when it lets out for the afternoon.

I sincerely hope that whilst your kids are at a vulnerable age (ie.
before the dont approach strangers rule is made) that you are there to
pick them up, and that the teacher wont release them without your
presence...

Pocket full of candy, or pills... give me a break.

You clearly also know jack **** about paedophiles in any case. the
predatory type you describe are by *FAR* the rarer variety, immensly
outnumbered by the opportunistic type.

They need to be dealt with
permanently. Every last one I have ever seen on the news is a repeat
offender.

Duh. why do you think the news was interested? which is a better story -
first time or multiple repeat offender?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.

In defense of Michael Jackson
 

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:54:43 GMT
"2mb" wrote:

My son will have all of the neighborhood perv photos memorized by the
time he is 6,

WHY? whats the point?

and instructions will be drilled into him on what to do *when* they
try something.

The same rule applies to all strangers. telling him some strangers are
worse than others only weakens the rule as you have muddied the water on
how to apply it. now you have a non-absolute rule.

Try taking a good book on parenting out of the library.

Do you want them around your kids unattended? How about outside of the
neighborhood elementary school when it lets out for the afternoon.

I sincerely hope that whilst your kids are at a vulnerable age (ie.
before the dont approach strangers rule is made) that you are there to
pick them up, and that the teacher wont release them without your
presence...

Pocket full of candy, or pills... give me a break.

You clearly also know jack **** about paedophiles in any case. the
predatory type you describe are by *FAR* the rarer variety, immensly
outnumbered by the opportunistic type.

They need to be dealt with
permanently. Every last one I have ever seen on the news is a repeat
offender.

Duh. why do you think the news was interested? which is a better story -
first time or multiple repeat offender?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.

In defense of Michael Jackson
 

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 20:42:03 GMT
"2mb" wrote:

Moments ago you were describing the extreme lengths to which you would
go in order to harm somebody.

No, I was describing what I thought the punishment should be.

Ah right - an armchair executioner - too gutless to do it yourself.

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with ketchup.

In defense of Michael Jackson
 

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 20:42:03 GMT
"2mb" wrote:

Moments ago you were describing the extreme lengths to which you would
go in order to harm somebody.

No, I was describing what I thought the punishment should be.

Ah right - an armchair executioner - too gutless to do it yourself.

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with ketchup.

In defense of Michael Jackson
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
om...
I'm dicgusted by the way this guy is persecuted. There is no proof
that he's done anything with these boys except shared his bed with
them. As he points out it is the most loving thin g a man can do -
share his bed with a boy. I do it all the time too with my

Nice one George. Even surpasses you normal taste standards.

geoff

In defense of Michael Jackson
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
om...
I'm dicgusted by the way this guy is persecuted. There is no proof
that he's done anything with these boys except shared his bed with
them. As he points out it is the most loving thin g a man can do -
share his bed with a boy. I do it all the time too with my

Nice one George. Even surpasses you normal taste standards.

geoff

In defense of Michael Jackson
 

WoodenHeadBorg blithered:

Nice one George.

Are you speaking to me, imbecile? If not, feel free to crawl back into
your private woodwork.

In defense of Michael Jackson
 

WoodenHeadBorg blithered:

Nice one George.

Are you speaking to me, imbecile? If not, feel free to crawl back into
your private woodwork.

In defense of Michael Jackson