![]() |
In defense of Michael Jackson
G.S. Nail wrote:
Joseph Oberlander wrote: That black and white huh? Well, according to the medical community, there are. I personally think there are quite a few somewhere inbetween. He presents a male image of himself only because he is in such a spotlight. How do you know he doesn't present a male image of himself because that's how he genuinly wants to present himself? You've got to quit OSAFing to get any credibility here. He obviously doesn't act like any typical male I know of. Not even close. IIRC, he's had most of his body hair(facial for sure) removed, wears his hair sort of long - and a bunch of little things that all add up to his being as feminine a male as possible and yet still being barely acceptable as such in our society. If he's not transexual, he's most definately hiding being gay - there are really only two explinations for his behavior over the last ten or so years - that he's "living in the closet" about something. I used to wear my hair long. I don't have a hairy back. I don't have a gruff voice. Am I gay/transexual? It's more than that - he's plainly put, trying to look like his sister. Possible, I've thought about that, could be the case - but I would say his behaviour seems more childlike. "I love you! I love you!" In any case, he's most definately imploding. |
In defense of Michael Jackson - yet another childish forgery
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ...
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message om Forgery: snip The intent of this post is to present me as being a person who sympathises with Michael Jackson. Nothing could be further from the truth. I'm dicgusted by the way this guy is persecuted. There is no proof that he's done anything with these boys except shared his bed with them. As he points out it is the most loving thin g a man can do - share his bed with a boy. I do it all the time too with my neighborhood boys, nephews and sometimes with my own daughter dressed as a boy since my own boy died a few years ago. I tell you a girl can make a good boy substitute with the righr haircut and a little rubber supplement from a "love" shop ;-) Touching a boy is not having sex if the boy is OK with it even private-part-touching. The boy can always say no and only stands to lose ice-cream, soda-pop and maybe a free day at an amusement-park. Many boys simply need touching because their parents and friends won't do it and they feel left out of any intimacy in their lives and can become dangerous criminals if not touched by some-one. ;-( Boys need little love in their lives too! Just my 2-cents. Arny Krueger man...who'd you **** off? Incidentally, i don't think that post is intended to "present [you] as being a person who sympathises with Michael Jackson." I think it's intent is to paint you as a pedophile. yikes. |
In defense of Michael Jackson - yet another childish forgery
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ...
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message om Forgery: snip The intent of this post is to present me as being a person who sympathises with Michael Jackson. Nothing could be further from the truth. I'm dicgusted by the way this guy is persecuted. There is no proof that he's done anything with these boys except shared his bed with them. As he points out it is the most loving thin g a man can do - share his bed with a boy. I do it all the time too with my neighborhood boys, nephews and sometimes with my own daughter dressed as a boy since my own boy died a few years ago. I tell you a girl can make a good boy substitute with the righr haircut and a little rubber supplement from a "love" shop ;-) Touching a boy is not having sex if the boy is OK with it even private-part-touching. The boy can always say no and only stands to lose ice-cream, soda-pop and maybe a free day at an amusement-park. Many boys simply need touching because their parents and friends won't do it and they feel left out of any intimacy in their lives and can become dangerous criminals if not touched by some-one. ;-( Boys need little love in their lives too! Just my 2-cents. Arny Krueger man...who\'d you **** off? Incidentally, i don\'t think that post is intended to "present [you] as being a person who sympathises with Michael Jackson." I think it\'s intent is to paint you as a pedophile. yikes. |
da sick spoof thread ... move on please! - In defense of Michael Jackson
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Peter Larsen said: This thread is way off of da topic in all newsgroups the original spoofer posted his sick crap in. The presence of Krooger inevitably leads to the presence of "sick crap" as well as extended discussions thereof. Not until you show up. |
da sick spoof thread ... move on please! - In defense of Michael Jackson
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Peter Larsen said: This thread is way off of da topic in all newsgroups the original spoofer posted his sick crap in. The presence of Krooger inevitably leads to the presence of "sick crap" as well as extended discussions thereof. Not until you show up. |
In defense of Michael Jackson
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... ThePaulThomas said: Another case of Usenet Masochism Syndrome is confessed. ThePaulThomas said: The real Arny [Kroofeces] has thousands of posts here on r.a.p. which I always enjoy reading. Not to worry, progress has been reported. There may be a cure soon. There won\'t be a "cure" for this sort of nonsense until people realise what they\'re up against... I was talking about a cure for your pathetic infection of Kroopologism. For normal people, reading Krooger\'s vile and disgusting spew is quite unpleasant. You claim to "enjoy" them, which means you are sick, sick, sick. What about the fact that you are the internet version of stalker? How do we cure YOU? |
In defense of Michael Jackson
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... ThePaulThomas said: Another case of Usenet Masochism Syndrome is confessed. ThePaulThomas said: The real Arny [Kroofeces] has thousands of posts here on r.a.p. which I always enjoy reading. Not to worry, progress has been reported. There may be a cure soon. There won\'t be a "cure" for this sort of nonsense until people realise what they\'re up against... I was talking about a cure for your pathetic infection of Kroopologism. For normal people, reading Krooger\'s vile and disgusting spew is quite unpleasant. You claim to "enjoy" them, which means you are sick, sick, sick. What about the fact that you are the internet version of stalker? How do we cure YOU? |
In defense of Michael Jackson
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Joseph Oberlander said: My guess is that it\'s not that so much as he\'s trapped in a world and body that\'s not what he desires. He\'s unable to or unwilling to deal with this as he is under a 24/7 spotlight. So he\'s regressing to a child. With all this training and insight, why do you refuse to turn your spotlight on Krooger? Because the really sick ******* is George Middius. |
In defense of Michael Jackson
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Joseph Oberlander said: My guess is that it\'s not that so much as he\'s trapped in a world and body that\'s not what he desires. He\'s unable to or unwilling to deal with this as he is under a 24/7 spotlight. So he\'s regressing to a child. With all this training and insight, why do you refuse to turn your spotlight on Krooger? Because the really sick ******* is George Middius. |
In defense of Michael Jackson
"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... With all this training and insight, why do you refuse to turn your spotlight on Krooger? Because the really sick ******* is George Middius. Not to mention his clique of ghouls, mental deficient, and sadists. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk