![]() |
Good amps all sound the same do they?
"Kurt Hamster" wrote in message ... On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:52:26 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton used to say... On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:37:46 GMT, Bob Latham wrote: In article , Don Pearce wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:38:25 GMT, Bob Latham wrote: I simply could not think of a better description at the time. How about 'the object' it was placed on? How about the location with respect to the speakers? I'm still thinking microphony here... Well yes I'm sure it was microphony I was just amazed at how great was its effect on solid state devices. I would be equally amazed. It is *possible* that this kit amp was really badly designed, or really badly built, but I have *never* come across anything close to the effect you have described in *any* SS amplifier. I've never seen the Taj Mahal in the 'flesh' but I *know* it's in India. Whaat? Last time I saw it, it was in the High Street, Stevenage Old Town.....!!! (Been in it dozens of times, after a night on the sherbert.... ;-) |
Good amps all sound the same do they?
Tat Chan wrote:
(now rebuilding X-Windows ... I remember the days when I was happy to recompile the whole Linux kernel in less than 5 minutes. Ah, the good old days). You still can... the kernel seems to have grown at about the same rate as CPUs have. well slightly less actually. I can doa full build (core and modules) in about 3 minutes). I've spent the last 3 days compiling packages to upgrade mnementh (of mnementh.co.uk) though - Im upgrading it to LFS unstable (www.linuxfromscratch.org) so that I can take advantage of some new features (like hardware mpeg decode on the VIA CLE266 in it. mnementh is my firewall/webserver/database/home theatre PC and lives under the TV. like all the other PCs here it boots from a networked storage server here which lives under the floor. mnementh has no moving parts (axcept its DVD-rom) and is actually 100% silent. the storage box has a gig of RAM and lives under the floor. it has ethernet and 2 harddiscs, which are tied together using md, so I can just add new discs into the filesystem and grow it onto them - no stupid drive letters, no '**** I have 300G on 9 partitions so I cant save my 50G file...' it just *works*. mnementh has its own isolated rootfs on the storage box (it is the firewall!) but all the other PCS share a common root filesystem. when they boot the storage serevr assigns them an IP via DHCP and they use the ip to determine what other non-common parts of the filesystem they should pick up - eg. my machine and SWMBOs machine share the rootfs but have different /tmp, /mnt, /var etc. all machines except mnementh also share /home and some common storage. my desktop box is a shutle XPC and without any discs sipnning, it really is quiet. We only have one PC to back up now too, which is nice. only 108Gig free right now though... need to rent some more DVDs... |
Good amps all sound the same do they?
"Kurt Hamster" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:25:18 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton used to say... Every time some jerk makes a wild claim that he fails to back up, and then moves on to lies and distortions because that's all he's got? :-) Well it's worked for you for years. :-) |
Good amps all sound the same do they?
Keith G wrote:
Interesting hypocracy - it's OK to generalise about valve amps but not about SS.....??? Note, *ALL* SS amps. One can make generalisations about both valve or SS amps, but not many will cover ALL SS or valve amps. |
Good amps all sound the same do they?
Kurt Hamster wrote:
A digital photo of your money would go a long way to proving your credibility too! somewhat irrelevant really - although I can assure you it *is* available, Its intended as a down payment on a mortgage. |
Good amps all sound the same do they?
"Kurt Hamster" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:01:26 +0100, Ian Molton used to say... Kurt Hamster wrote: A digital photo of your money would go a long way to proving your credibility too! somewhat irrelevant really - although I can assure you it *is* available, Its intended as a down payment on a mortgage. So why should we accept *your* assurance when you are sinularly anable accept Bob's? Should we believe that you are in some way more reliable? Damn good point! (Jeez, you're sharp today, Kurt! - You taking anything out of the ordinary? :-) |
Good amps all sound the same do they?
"Ian Molton" wrote in message ... Kurt Hamster wrote: A digital photo of your money would go a long way to proving your credibility too! somewhat irrelevant really - although I can assure you it *is* available, Its intended as a down payment on a mortgage. Then best keep quiet about it and go buy your house, then....... |
Good amps all sound the same do they?
"Ian Molton" wrote in message ... Keith G wrote: Interesting hypocracy - it's OK to generalise about valve amps but not about SS.....??? Note, *ALL* SS amps. One can make generalisations about both valve or SS amps, but not many will cover ALL SS or valve amps. Wouldn't be a very *general* 'generalisation' then, would it.....?? :-) |
Good amps all sound the same do they?
"Kurt Hamster" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:14:42 +0100, Keith G used to say... "Kurt Hamster" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:01:26 +0100, Ian Molton used to say... Kurt Hamster wrote: A digital photo of your money would go a long way to proving your credibility too! somewhat irrelevant really - although I can assure you it *is* available, Its intended as a down payment on a mortgage. So why should we accept *your* assurance when you are sinularly anable accept Bob's? Should we believe that you are in some way more reliable? Damn good point! (Jeez, you're sharp today, Kurt! - You taking anything out of the ordinary? :-) Heheheh, wish I was :) Pontificating, pious prats who insist on 'do as I say, not as I do' **** me right off. Not to mention the "MUST measure it before I use it brigade"... Well, I hafta say it's not much good measuring it *after* you've used it!! (Well, not in *my* case anyway!! :-) |
Good amps all sound the same do they?
Kurt Hamster wrote:
So why should we accept *your* assurance when you are sinularly anable accept Bob's? Should we believe that you are in some way more reliable? Would wether I have the money make any difference as to wether I would be bound to pay it should he prove his assertions ? certainly he stands to make at least an insignificant amount. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk