Keith G wrote:
Andre Jute wrote:
Gentlemen and others on UKRA:
crap snipped
Give it a rest now - you're just making yourself look silly....
Below is the evidence that you silly jerks on UKRA sent the eejit
Pinkerton on a crusade to "exterminate" RAT. It puts the egg on your
faces, not mine. You can't sneer the facts of your complicity in this
boorishness out of existence.
Here, with compliments from those you called "scrotum-rubbers" is your
standard-bearer back, in tatters.
I suggest you shut the **** up lest I decide to do to UKRA what you
sent Pinkerton to do to RAT, but to do it competently.
Andre Jute
UKRA's GUILT, FROM ITS OWN MOUTH AT:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/... 8d762a34479b
*******
A little birdie tells me....
Keith G
Dec 7 2004, 3:31 pm
.....that Pinky has legged it over to RAT and is waving Sand Amps in
their
faces!!
I suppose you've got to give the **** kudos for 'taking the fight to
the
enemy'...!!!
(I bet that's got all the scrotum-rubbers in a tiz!! :-)
**********
AND, FOR THE RECORD, HERE IS THE OUTCOME OF PINKERTON'S CRUSADE TO
"EXTERMINATE" RAT:
Gentlemen and others on UKRA:
Poor Pinko Presumptuous is being crucified on RAT. You UKRA jokers who
sent the pitiful little man to RAT to "take the fight to the enemy" (1)
had better come fetch what's left of your gladiatorial envoy before
there is nothing left except a whimpering wet spot.
Pinkerton is a posturing poodlefaker who knows nothing about
electronics we don't already know and less about polemics. Below is a
dire example of Pinko running kamikazi-fashion to commit suicide.
Next time you desk soldiers of UKRA want to declare war on RAT, send
someone who at least has the wit to be entertaining while he flames us.
Since you clearly have no one with the faintest glimmer, perhaps you
should borrow Lord Valve from alt.guitar.amps or go get Arnie from
wherever. RAT is a first class newsgroup; we deserve to be flamed by a
first class flame merchant, not some faintwitted tenth carbon copy.
Pinkerton isn't just turning himself into a laughingstock, he's turning
UKRA, his boorish sponsor (2), into a laughingstock. He's giving
engineers everywhere a bad name by his eagerness to fall over his own
feet.
Sheesh! A little flame war isn't rocket science -- and you send us this
congenital eejit! How can you expect anyone to treat you with respect
if Pinkerton is the best you can manage?
Andre Jute
(1) uk.rec.audio in the thread "A little birdie tells me.... " on and
around 8 December 2004: "kudos for 'taking the fight to the
enemy'...!!!"
(2) How can it not be boorish for you to send a piece of transistor
slime to assault a tube newsgroup without any provocation? It is doubly
boorish to send such an unsubtle and unsophisticated incompetent as
Pinkerton.
****
Here's just one sample of the Pinko's stumblebum stupidities on RAT:
John Byrns wrote, quoting Andre Jute:
(1) One can easily spot the most useless engineers. Twenty and
thirty
years after they left college they insist on telling everyone
that they
have a diploma and that after years of switching on the lights
over the
boards of more creative men they rose all the way to "senior
designer". Typically they have been pushed out of jobs as
analog or
digital hardware engineers and now do "software engineering"
which
is most often a euphemism for plugging together the computers
of more
productive workers, or they have other jobs altogether and
resent their
fall enough not to care that they expose their bitterness in
public.
Stewart Pinkerton whined:
On a completely seperate note, I am disappointed that you would
egregiously include the bitter ravings of Jute in your post. I
thought
better of you. Jute's post tells much more of him than of me, and
I
had presumed more of you than to be a mirror of his despair.
John Byrns replied:
What you call the "bitter ravings of Jute" is the only plausible
explanation I have yet seen for your activities in this group. Your
whole
purpose for posting in this group appears to be to make as many
negative
comments about tube amplifiers as possible [snip]. Can you give a
better
reason than Andre's to explain your apparent need to make constant
negative comments about tubes, in a group of tube lovers?
Stewart Pinkerton whined ever more defensively:
If you took the trouble to actually read what I wrote, you'd see that
I have no problem with those who design with tubes for hobby reasons.
I do however have a problem with those who claim that tubes have any
kind of genuine superiority in terms of high fidelity to the source.
This simply is *not* the case, and I'm happy to explain exactly why
this is so.
Regrettably, some tubeophiles get upset when their pet theories are
debunked, and feel a desperate need to shoot the messenger. I've
never
yet seen a *logical* rebuttal to my arguments.
To which the answer, from those few who can still be bothered with
Pinkerton, will probably be, Who cares **** what your "problems" are.
But there's no need to go there. Come fetch the damp little squirt
home, will you. This is getting embarrassing.
Pinko Presumptuous: yours, gentlemen of UKRA?
Linear Mode
