A public apology to Andre Jute.
 

wrote:
wrote:
http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg

Right-click on the image.

Funny thing. The "properties" show that this image was both created and
modified on February 18, 2006. No images (so far) or links to images
with a date prior to the 18th of this month. Just words.

Mr. McCoy does pride himself on his words....

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

If he's the genius he claims to be,

I make no such claim. I don't have to. There are always scads of
wannable polemicists willing to make the claim on my behalf.

I'm sure he'll figure out the
way to give any photograph the properties needed to
support any claims.

If I wanted to cheat, I could have doctored the photographs. But, in
addition to all the other URL's already given, those photos have been
standing for years on independent netsites belonging to RATs of
excellent repute, here
http://www.geocities.com/mixtel99/index.html
and here
http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/MZamp.jpg
These lies Useless Wiecky tells so transparently has nothing to do with
proof but with his envious hatred of me; he'll say anything at all in
his swingeing attempts to damage me; he doesn't care that everyone else
on these conferences can instantly see that he snips maliciously to
keep his lies alive in the face of the evidence, just like his hero,
Pinkerton.

Perhaps a copy of the newspaper the day it was taken included
in the background of the next series of authentication photos.

Oh, I think the that the scum who allege I didn't build an amp of which
the photographs are so widely distributed will now find the onus on
them to prove their dumb allegation... LOL. Watch me dance on this
undereducated trailer park trash.

How does it charge batteries from AC?

The batteries are in a DC circuit. They trickle charge from the current
flowing through the tube's resistance. It doesn't matter where in the
cathode circuit the batteries are placed, the current flows, though
there are arguments for putting the batteries in the grid leak position
ie parallel to the attenuator and very strong arguments for putting the
batteries in series with the grid. All these positions are however "in
the cathode circuit" and do not affect the charging.

Neat schematic.
True genius.

Don't make me blush, man. It's just an amp. Before I took up tube amps
for my hobby I designed and built cars. One certainly met a nicer class
of person among the Bentley drivers.

Just for the record, the scumbag Useless Wiecky is another who now owes
me an apology for his lies, among other instances for his lies about
the image
http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg

Andre Jute
Visit Jute on Amps at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/
"wonderfully well written and reasoned information
for the tube audio constructor"
John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare
"an unbelievably comprehensive web site
containing vital gems of wisdom"
Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review

The Pinkerton Pathology, part 1: beyond anti-social tendency into disease
 

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On 19 Feb 2006 05:56:21 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/t39kiss001.jpg
http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg
See also
http://www.allaudios.org/detail-9461307.html date 7 December 2004
and here Pinkerton admits he saw the photograph on 25 April 2005:
http://www.dvd-software.info/forums/ftopic27097.html

*New* evidence to damn Pinkerton's lies is found in independent sites
where the photos have been standing for years:
http://www.geocities.com/mixtel99/index.html
and here
http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/MZamp.jpg

Interesting that you have never before produced this 'evidence'...

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Since when is it my responsibility to stop you making a fool of
yourself for a year by your claim that an amp I built and published
photos of is unbuilt? You, Stewart Pinkerton, knew the amp was built,
(for instance when you commented on the photographs on 25 April 2005),
then repeatedly lied and lied and lied that it wasn't built. Now you
want to blame me, the victim of your vicious lies, for your vicious
lies? Only in the world of the psychopath is the victim to blame for
the violence the psycho practises on him.

An intelligent person would not have gotten himself into such a mess as
you did by lying out of spite for so long after you knew the truth. A
gentleman would have apologized a year ago. Only a psychopath would
have kept on lying for so long the amp was unbuilt when he knew he was
lying.. You do these things to yourself, PinkoStinko, by the
viciousness of your character.

Andre Jute
Everything comes to him who waits -- Gautama Budha

A public apology to Andre Jute.
 

On 19 Feb 2006 14:11:28 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

wrote:
wrote:
http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg

Right-click on the image.

Funny thing. The "properties" show that this image was both created and
modified on February 18, 2006. No images (so far) or links to images
with a date prior to the 18th of this month. Just words.

Mr. McCoy does pride himself on his words....

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

If he's the genius he claims to be,

I make no such claim. I don't have to. There are always scads of
wannable polemicists willing to make the claim on my behalf.

I'm sure he'll figure out the
way to give any photograph the properties needed to
support any claims.

If I wanted to cheat, I could have doctored the photographs. But, in
addition to all the other URL's already given, those photos have been
standing for years on independent netsites belonging to RATs of
excellent repute, here
http://www.geocities.com/mixtel99/index.html
and here
http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/MZamp.jpg

Isn't it fascinating that both those photographs show properties dated
20 February 2006? You're not even a good liar, let alone technically
competent.

--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Jute lies like a cheap rug
 

On 19 Feb 2006 13:49:11 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:


wrote:
http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg

Right-click on the image.

Funny thing. The "properties" show that this image was both created and
modified on February 18, 2006. No images (so far) or links to images
with a date prior to the 18th of this month. Just words.

Let's see. The image you say was created yesterday was referenced on
the net on 7 December 2004 at this reference:
http://www.allaudios.org/detail-9461307.html
and on RAT on 7 and 9 December 2004
http://groups.google.ie/group/rec.au...0 398798b8cfd
and here on 23 April 2005 Stewart Pinkerton himself comments on it:
http://www.dvd-software.info/forums/ftopic27097.html

Indeed yes - and that photograph is *not* of the KISS amp, but of the
'potato amp' which you yourself describe as 'development mule for the
KISS driver stage'. The KISS amp photograph is a very recent addition.

Everyone on RAT has seen that image for years now (looks from the
copyright information that I made it in 2003...). Copies of it have
been sitting on Mick's site here
http://www.geocities.com/mixtel99/index.html
since 2003 or 2004 or whatever, too long ago to remember, and on John
Byrns's site here
http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/MZamp.jpg
since 2003 or 2004 or whatever, too long ago to remember.

That picture, so widely distributed, showing the amp under
construction, complete and in use with horns, is all the proof required
that you, Useless Wiecky, are a liar and that Stewart Pinkerton is an
habitual liar.

Nope, *none* of those is a photograph of a completed KISS amp. The
only existing photograph of a purportedly complete KISS is the one
which mysteriously appeared a few days ago, and which certainly
doesn't show any wiring.

Jute, your (in)credibility on RAT is such that not one single person
is supporting you here, and you are such a proven pathological liar
that if you posted that grass is green, we'd have to look out of the
window to check.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

The Pinkerton Pathology, part 1: beyond anti-social tendency into disease
 

paul packer wrote:
On 18 Feb 2006 16:02:12 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

Those boards
were so beautiful, I took my time soldering, making each joint a work
of beauty, and then couldn't resist writing a little article about the
pooftah flick of the wrist required for such beautiful soldering. The
usual scum went ballistic and, true to form, for the wrong reason:
because my soldering was *too* beautiful, not for my political
incorrectness.

What's the usual penalty for excessively beautiful soldering? It's not
an offence I've come across before.

Well may you ask, Paul. But I must admit I don't know. The "usual" scum
is so bizarre in their pathologies, God himself may not know what they
consider the usual penalty for excessively beautiful soldering to be. I
held up the lovely fat target of "pooftah" and they objected to the
beautiful soldering! I concluded that, besides being really bizarre,
the usual scum are also extraordinarily insensitive. But at least
extreme insensitivity fits the known profile of the *ugly engineer* and
wannabes and hangersons of the same class, indeed in the opinion of
many (including their unfortunate families) defines them. Even the
nimble Andy Evans would be hard put to explain such excessive hatred of
beautiful soldering.

Even when faced with such a gulf of ignorance of the human condition
(if they are indeed human, which could be debated), I find comfort in
the tiny insights gained by viewing the alien growths I study from many
angles. Of course, one must ration these insights. Too much
understanding, for instance of a malicious cancer on society like
Pinkerton, can cause uncontrollable weeping fits and seeping skin
rashes.

Take care.

Andre Jute

More Jute pretention
 

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:01:05 GMT, (paul packer)
wrote:

On 18 Feb 2006 16:02:12 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

Those boards
were so beautiful, I took my time soldering, making each joint a work
of beauty, and then couldn't resist writing a little article about the
pooftah flick of the wrist required for such beautiful soldering. The
usual scum went ballistic and, true to form, for the wrong reason:
because my soldering was *too* beautiful, not for my political
incorrectness.

What's the usual penalty for excessively beautiful soldering? It's not
an offence I've come across before.

And it's just about the *only* offence unlikely to have been committed
by Jute..................
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

The Pinkerton Pathology, part 1: beyond anti-social tendency into disease
 

In article .com, "Andre
Jute" wrote:

Yeah, right. Poor old Useless Wiecky; doesn't have a tube amp,
certainly never built one -- but of course he knows better than I do
how it should be built. More macarooneys from the boonies; this poor
johnniecomelately appears completely unaware that he can buy back
copies of Glass Audio and other hobbyist magazines and perve over
piccies of other amps and test gear I've built. Rather reminds me of
the Magnequest Scum abusing me for a photo of my T113 I built on the
proto boards when they came from the licensee in Japan. Those boards
were so beautiful, I took my time soldering, making each joint a work
of beauty, and then couldn't resist writing a little article about the
pooftah flick of the wrist required for such beautiful soldering. The
usual scum went ballistic and, true to form, for the wrong reason:
because my soldering was *too* beautiful, not for my political
incorrectness.

Andre Jute


Hi Andre,

I don't think "Wiecky" is a builder, he is more into doing repairs, and he
certainly doesn't have a clue when it comes to design, so he is hardly
qualified to critique the design and construction of your prototype
amplifier. I suspect that if he were a builder his style would be the
"Craftsman" style as espoused by Henry Pasternack and most other
contemporary tube audiophiles who value form over function.

It;s too bad "Wiecky" wasn't around during the flame wars over my "Power
Amp Without Power Transformer" back in 1998, he could have lent some moral
support to the self-proclaimed "Danger Dave". It's going on 8 years since
I built that amplifier, and contrary to "Danger Dave's" prediction it
still hasn't burned the house to the ground, while being in daily use, nor
has it even suffered so much as a single component failure.


Regards,

John Byrns


Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/

A public apology to Andre Jute.
 

In article , Stewart Pinkerton
wrote:

On 19 Feb 2006 14:11:28 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

If I wanted to cheat, I could have doctored the photographs. But, in
addition to all the other URL's already given, those photos have been
standing for years on independent netsites belonging to RATs of
excellent repute, here
http://www.geocities.com/mixtel99/index.html
and here
http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/MZamp.jpg

Isn't it fascinating that both those photographs show properties dated
20 February 2006? You're not even a good liar, let alone technically
competent.

With this post Stewart Pinkerton reveals himself as either extraordinarily
computer illiterate, or a lying scum bag. The "MZamp.jpg" picture has
been on my web pages since January 1, 2004. The "Page Info" command on my
old Netscape browser reveals the following information with respect to the
date the picture went up on my web page.

Location:http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/MZamp.jpg
File MIME Type:image/jpeg
Last Modified:Thu, Jan 1, 2004 10:40:48 PM Local time
Last Modified:Fri, Jan 2, 2004 4:40:48 AM GMT

Andre was clearly up late that night because I had received the picture
from him at 9:13 PM CST that same night, which would be 3:13 AM GMT.

Unlike the photos on Andre's web pages I can't find any camera properties
on this photo, but obviously the picture was taken on or before January 1,
2004.

Regards,

John Byrns


Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/

The Pinkerton Pathology, part 1: beyond anti-social tendencyinto disease
 

in article , John Byrns
at wrote on 2/20/06 2:14 PM:

In article .com, "Andre
Jute" wrote:

Yeah, right. Poor old Useless Wiecky; doesn't have a tube amp,
certainly never built one -- but of course he knows better than I do
how it should be built. More macarooneys from the boonies; this poor
johnniecomelately appears completely unaware that he can buy back
copies of Glass Audio and other hobbyist magazines and perve over
piccies of other amps and test gear I've built. Rather reminds me of
the Magnequest Scum abusing me for a photo of my T113 I built on the
proto boards when they came from the licensee in Japan. Those boards
were so beautiful, I took my time soldering, making each joint a work
of beauty, and then couldn't resist writing a little article about the
pooftah flick of the wrist required for such beautiful soldering. The
usual scum went ballistic and, true to form, for the wrong reason:
because my soldering was *too* beautiful, not for my political
incorrectness.

Andre Jute


Hi Andre,

I don't think "Wiecky" is a builder, he is more into doing repairs, and he
certainly doesn't have a clue when it comes to design, so he is hardly
qualified to critique the design and construction of your prototype
amplifier. I suspect that if he were a builder his style would be the
"Craftsman" style as espoused by Henry Pasternack and most other
contemporary tube audiophiles who value form over function.

*** I've never seen your work, John, but I can vouch for Henry's and it IS
first-rate. He does understand theory, and I don't agree that he puts form
above function.

Asmy grandmother said, anything worth doing is worth doing well. In that
weltanschauung, there is no place for chicken****.

Cheers,

Jon

It;s too bad "Wiecky" wasn't around during the flame wars over my "Power
Amp Without Power Transformer" back in 1998, he could have lent some moral
support to the self-proclaimed "Danger Dave". It's going on 8 years since
I built that amplifier, and contrary to "Danger Dave's" prediction it
still hasn't burned the house to the ground, while being in daily use, nor
has it even suffered so much as a single component failure.


Regards,

John Byrns


Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/

The Pinkerton Pathology, part 1: beyond anti-social tendency into disease
 

John:

As I remember, you isolated the input and the output from the mains
power via appropriate transformers. Why would I think this is
dangerous?

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA