![]() |
A public apology to Andre Jute.
I am not sure that I understand your question, there is no link to Andre's
pictures from my home page, John: Then from the point of view of a non-historian who may not have taken part in prior discussions real or imagined, the link to Mr. McCoy's amp on your site could have been posted yesterday, equally as likely as 1994 other than your word. No doubt your word is good, however the question remains as to whether that picture is of any actual functioning device and/or the same as the one represented as being a 12-year-old working example by Mr. McCoy. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
A public apology to Andre Jute.
Arfa Daily wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg Right-click on the image. Funny thing. The "properties" show that this image was both created and modified on February 18, 2006. No images (so far) or links to images with a date prior to the 18th of this month. Just words. Mr. McCoy does pride himself on his words.... Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA Don't the "properties", derived as a right click off of any web based photo, show the creation and mod dates to be today's date ? Arfa This lying scumbag Useless Wiecky has been shown those images in three different locations and multiple URLs to those images in several archives more than a year old. He has been told by the owner of one of the sites which hold the images that they have been sitting there since 1 Jan 2004, over years ago. Now he is accusing everyone else of lying. Peter Wieck is not computer illiterate, he's vicious, lying scum. http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/t39kiss001.jpg http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg See also http://www.allaudios.org/detail-9461307.html date 7 December 2004 and here Pinkerton admits he saw the photograph on 25 April 2005: http://www.dvd-software.info/forums/ftopic27097.html Evidence to damn Pinkerton's (and Wieck's) lies in independent sites where the photos have been standing for years: http://www.geocities.com/mixtel99/index.html and here http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/MZamp.jpg since 1 January 2004, for proof of which (as if it were required!) see another independent archive: http://www.allaudios.org/detail-7212364.html Andre Jute |
The Pinkerton Pathology, part 1: beyond anti-social tendency into disease
John Byrns wrote:
In article .com, "Andre Jute" wrote: Yeah, right. Poor old Useless Wiecky; doesn't have a tube amp, certainly never built one -- but of course he knows better than I do how it should be built. More macarooneys from the boonies; this poor johnniecomelately appears completely unaware that he can buy back copies of Glass Audio and other hobbyist magazines and perve over piccies of other amps and test gear I've built. Rather reminds me of the Magnequest Scum abusing me for a photo of my T113 I built on the proto boards when they came from the licensee in Japan. Those boards were so beautiful, I took my time soldering, making each joint a work of beauty, and then couldn't resist writing a little article about the pooftah flick of the wrist required for such beautiful soldering. The usual scum went ballistic and, true to form, for the wrong reason: because my soldering was *too* beautiful, not for my political incorrectness. Andre Jute Hi Andre, I don't think "Wiecky" is a builder, he is more into doing repairs, and he certainly doesn't have a clue when it comes to design, so he is hardly qualified to critique the design and construction of your prototype amplifier. I suspect that if he were a builder his style would be the "Craftsman" style as espoused by Henry Pasternack and most other contemporary tube audiophiles who value form over function. It;s too bad "Wiecky" wasn't around during the flame wars over my "Power Amp Without Power Transformer" back in 1998, he could have lent some moral support to the self-proclaimed "Danger Dave". At first I thought Useless Wiecky came to RAT to throw himself against my ankles for the usual reason, that sucker fish like to brag that they swim with sharks, but his references and attitudes make a good case, as a couple of people who actually read his posts wrote to me offlist, that Wiecky is another Magnequest Mob sockpuppet, that Pasternack has his whole hand to the shoulder up Useless Wiecky's ass. Pasternack's fingers quacking Wiecky's flabby lips. If you check Wiecky's permanent arrival on RAT late in 2004 you will see I welcomed him in the warmest tones and that without drawing breath he started abusing me without any reason in very Pasternack-like tones; his use of the Timmie material (a triumph for the Magnequest Scum who stole it from my own computer) is particularly convincing evidence of the case. In the last 18 months or so we have seen Pinkerton and Yaeger exposed as sockpuppets taking their instructions from Pasternack, we have seen Poopie Stevenson, who doesn't know **** about anything, mysteriously "invited" (most likely by Pasternack scraping the bottom of the barrel for sock puppets) onto RAT with the self-declared intention of riding my ass, we have seen Pasternack, clearly convinced that his tide of sockpuppets failed, begging to be let back into RAT (offering to gang up with me against you -- he still has learned nothing!). It's going on 8 years since I built that amplifier, and contrary to "Danger Dave's" prediction it still hasn't burned the house to the ground, while being in daily use, nor has it even suffered so much as a single component failure. Mmm. I was looking forward to being able to say I know a guy so reckless for good sound, he runs an amplifier in daily danger (hee-hee) of burning down his house. It is the same impulse as saying I know a guy who runs his ESL63 without the metal grills (I did too, but he grew old and married again and his wife made him put the grilles back on). It is the same impulse as being able to say I know a guy who bought a *second* Jaguar in the days before Ford took over the brand and made it reliable (I did too--every time he drove a thousand miles without an electrical fire in his Jag, he ordered champagne...).Then you published the circuit and we discovered your amplifier wasn't even a little dangerous... But seriously (very, considering), when Dangerdavie fell down dead in front of a doughnut joint from a heart attack brought on by rage at hearing on his mobile phone that I refused to share with him the money I earned out of the Magnequest Mob's shenanigans, and in particular the six-figure sum I made out of disposing of Deutschmann for threatening Dangerdavie with a bank's attorneys, I was making a memo to myself on my Newton to sear Dangerdavie's malicious soul on the next and every succeeding anniversary of your "Power Amplifier Without Power Transformer" with a reminder that your house hadn't burned down yet! But the Devil claimed his own first. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ Dangerdave was immoral through and through, like those candy canes with the name of a seaside resort all the way from end to end, so that wherever you break it, there the fundamental characteristic of the thing stares out at you. Compared to Dangerdave, the wannabe-wicked wet-tinder flamemongers we have on RAT now are limp comb-overs, Bible-belt vestrymen stealing from the collection plate. Of course, we should beware of becoming nostalgic for Dangerdave. He contributed nothing of value, precisely as his successors (Henry "Pompass" Plodnick, Stewart "Psycho" Pinkerton, Peter "Useless" Wieck, Graham "Poopie" Stevenson -- as horrid a collection of pompous plodders as ever disgraced the letter P) have contributed nothing of value and will contribute nothing of value. Andre Jute |
The Pinkerton Pathology, part 1: beyond anti-social tendency into disease
You do lead a rich fantasy life.... six-figure settlements.... and
many-euro bets. Wowsers.... That should keep you in angel-dust for a while. Oh, sorry.... these bets are with Andrew McCoy... Right. Sorry for not catching on so fast. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
The Pinkerton Pathology, part 1: beyond anti-social tendency into disease
John Byrns wrote: In article .com, " wrote: Whoops.... I forgot to note that your soldering also appeared to be quite elegant as I remember, with no lethal voltages exposed above the chassis. Not the mare's nest of miscellaneous higglety-pigglety that Mr. McCoy displays in his Magnum Opus. Just an observation. I wouldn't call the wiring a "mare's nest", and in any case we may be jumping to invalid conclusions about "lethal voltages exposed above the chassis." If the amplifier in question was intended purely as a breadboard to be used to develop the circuits, then it is perfectly normal and reasonable for there to be "lethal voltages exposed above the chassis." But I suspect that the real situation here is somewhat different. It looks to me like Andre has built the amplifier circuits on a metal panel which ultimately forms one side, or the top, of an enclosure which isolates the lethal voltages from contact with stray human or animal body parts. I am only guessing at this, perhaps Andre could comment on my speculation. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ I don't see the point of legitimizing Useless Wiecky's vicious flamemongering by corresponding with him as an equal. The amplifier in the photograph is a development prototype in which all the tubes and all the electrics are cover by the case. The flat surface that Useless can see (and admits by his lies that they were claimed yesterday or today or a minute ago, depending on his mood) is the lid of the case. The same page, which he admits having seen, shows the case covering all the electrics, including the tube. Useless Wiecky is lying through his teeth yet again when he claims there are "lethal voltages exposed above the chassis". This fellow Wieck is useless. He contributes nothing. By these lies, and our replies, he tries to make himself important in the light reflected from people who actually build amps. Andre Jute |
A public apology to Andre Jute.
John Byrns wrote: In article .com, " wrote: The "MZamp.jpg" picture has been on my web pages since January 1, 2004. Please kindly show how one gets from your home page to the link noted. Does look a lot like he lies, and you swear to it. I am not sure that I understand your question, there is no link to Andre's pictures from my home page, you must know they are there and enter the direct URL that Andre provided. If it would somehow help I could temporarily modify the HTML for my home page to include references to Andre's pictures, although it is not obvious to me how that would help given that the URL's have been posted. I haven't done it, but the issue might be somewhat settled by checking the Google archives of "rec.audio.tubes" around January 1, 2004, as I suspect there are references to these pictures and the URL's on my web pages where they are located. Many, many, many references, starting here on 1 January 2004, more than two years ago: http://www.allaudios.org/detail-7212364.html In addition to his lying immorality, Useless Wiecky appears suddenly to have become totally useless with Google. That's probably further proof that he gets all his information about you and me from Pasternack. So, having been given the reference, where is you apology to John, eh, Useless Wiecky, and where is your apology to me, eh, Useless Wiecky? Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ Andre Jute |
The Pinkerton Pathology, part 1: beyond anti-social tendency into disease
On 20 Feb 2006 09:05:51 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:
Too much understanding, for instance of a malicious cancer on society like Pinkerton, can cause uncontrollable weeping fits and seeping skin rashes. That's truly odd. I've had a bad rash over much of my body for the last week, but I'd never have guessed without your guidance that it was due to Stewart Pinkerton. |
A public apology to Andre Jute.
Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:50 -0600, (John Byrns) wrote: The "MZamp.jpg" picture has been on my web pages since January 1, 2004. Fair enough, I'll take your word on *that* picture having been around for a while, In fact for over two years. And it is pixel for pixel the same picture as http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg which Pinkerton claims was made today, or yesterday, or whatever he decides, depending on his mood swings. but please note that this is not the photograph in question, since it is *not* a photo of a KISS amp, just of what Jute himself I am Andre Jute. KiSS is my amp (actually amplifiers, plural). I built it. I know what it is. I show a picture as a courtesy. It is utterly bizarre for this netstalker Stewart Pinkerton to claim to know better than I do what my name is, which of my amps is in a photograph, and whether the sun is shining outside my own window. This thread has about sixty posts already, because PinkoPsycho and his sockpuppets want to rewrite history to prove their own prejudice. They have repeatedly been offered proof that they are lying but simply as repeatedly reject the proof. describes as a 'development mule for the KISS driver stage'. That's a built amp, with photographs and schematics and thousands of words of description, and a huge volume of nettraffic. But Pinkerton repeatedly claims it wasn't built! Even as Pinkerton admits it was built, a few seconds later he claims it wasn't built! I already acknowledged the existence of *that* amplifier around April last year. That is another lie but let's pretend to take your word for it. In that case, why are you now claiming an amp I made by stripping off part of the KISS 300B amp proves that the 300B amp never existed? The KISS photo mysteriously appeared last week out of thin air, and has never been seen before. No. It had been sitting on my netsite for over a year waiting to be referenced when I write the relevant chapter. I should know. It is my netsite. Again. It is utterly bizarre to accuse me of not having built an amplifier simply because I didn't send every clown on the internet a personal notification of where to find the photographs. (As it is utterly bizarre to accuse John Byrns of lying about when he put photographs of my amp on his site, simply because the clown making the accusation, Useless Wiecky, has not seen the photographs there!) Only a psychopath like Pinkerton would expect such a travesty of natural justice to be accepted. It's also not clear that the KISS portrayed is a working amplifier. You are a psychopath, Pinkerton, that's for sure. In the end you will be reduced to claiming that you didn't lie because you always intended to say that the only amplifiers you recognize as real are painted black and have solid state devices in them, therefore my KISS, painted grey and with tubes, cannot exist in your universe. Basically, Jute tells so many obvious and ludicrous lies that his credibility is totally shot. Really? You, and the Magnequest Scum before you, have tried for years to prove I told a lie. You haven't yet proved that I ever told a single lie. You cannot, because I don't lie. I don't have to. I do things right out in public and I am not ashamed of doing them. You and the other clowns do nothing, except kibbitz what I do. You might ask what happened to the Magnequest Scum, to their outriders, to Pasternack, and all the other little netstalkers before you, sucker fish bragging (temporarily) that they swim with a shark. So your excuse is now that even if you cannot deny the evidence of years of photographs and widely available net references, that you just don't believe the amp exists because you can't prove any lies against me. What a novel idea of truth you have, Pinkerton. (Did you learn it at engineering school. Or is that why no one will give you a job as an engineer and you have to work in a postroom?) Having been called on KISS as vapourware for more than a year, By the psychopath Pinkerton who simply will not accept mountains of evidence, all of it contrary to his prejudice. he *now* claims that it's been around for years? I don't think so........ I don't have to "claim" it has been around for years. Google demonstrates amply that it has been around since at least 2003; independent witnesses abound. If you weren't such an electronic blockhead, Pinkerton, in addition to being a bully, a fool and and a psychopath, you would be able to trace the T39 Mk VI which is the KISS Ultrafi type number, back to my Types 29, 30, 33 and 36 and at least five earlier incarnations of the T39 going back to the early 1990s, and the KiSS "Populaire" back to my Modular Amp "Lundahl" series of a decade ago. In fact, if you didn't have a one-second attention span, you could have read this genealogical history for a year now on my site in the KISS materials he http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/ -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering This thread was started to demonstrate that Stewart Pinkerton rewrites history to suit his irrational hatreds. It has succeeded beyond my fondest expectations. Unsigned out of contempt for scum |
A public apology to Andre Jute.
Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:50 -0600, (John Byrns) wrote: The "MZamp.jpg" picture has been on my web pages since January 1, 2004. Fair enough, I'll take your word on *that* picture having been around for a while, In fact for over two years. And it is pixel for pixel the same picture as http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/K...0T68MZ417A.jpg which Pinkerton claims was made today, or yesterday, or whatever he decides, depending on his mood swings. but please note that this is not the photograph in question, since it is *not* a photo of a KISS amp, just of what Jute himself I am Andre Jute. KiSS is my amp (actually amplifiers, plural). I built it. I know what it is. I show a picture as a courtesy. It is utterly bizarre for this netstalker Stewart Pinkerton to claim to know better than I do what my name is, which of my amps is in a photograph, and whether the sun is shining outside my own window. This thread has about sixty posts already, because PinkoPsycho and his sockpuppets want to rewrite history to prove their own prejudice. They have repeatedly been offered proof that they are lying but simply as repeatedly reject the proof. describes as a 'development mule for the KISS driver stage'. That's a built amp, with photographs and schematics and thousands of words of description, and a huge volume of nettraffic. But Pinkerton repeatedly claims it wasn't built! Even as Pinkerton admits it was built, a few seconds later he claims it wasn't built! I already acknowledged the existence of *that* amplifier around April last year. That is another lie but let's pretend to take your word for it. In that case, why are you now claiming an amp I made by stripping off part of the KISS 300B amp proves that the 300B amp never existed? The KISS photo mysteriously appeared last week out of thin air, and has never been seen before. No. It had been sitting on my netsite for over a year waiting to be referenced when I write the relevant chapter. I should know. It is my netsite. Again. It is utterly bizarre to accuse me of not having built an amplifier simply because I didn't send every clown on the internet a personal notification of where to find the photographs. (As it is utterly bizarre to accuse John Byrns of lying about when he put photographs of my amp on his site, simply because the clown making the accusation, Useless Wiecky, has not seen the photographs there!) Only a psychopath like Pinkerton would expect such a travesty of natural justice to be accepted. It's also not clear that the KISS portrayed is a working amplifier. You are a psychopath, Pinkerton, that's for sure. In the end you will be reduced to claiming that you didn't lie because you always intended to say that the only amplifiers you recognize as real are painted black and have solid state devices in them, therefore my KISS, painted grey and with tubes, cannot exist in your universe. Basically, Jute tells so many obvious and ludicrous lies that his credibility is totally shot. Really? You, and the Magnequest Scum before you, have tried for years to prove I told a lie. You haven't yet proved that I ever told a single lie. You cannot, because I don't lie. I don't have to. I do things right out in public and I am not ashamed of doing them. You and the other clowns do nothing, except kibbitz what I do. You might ask what happened to the Magnequest Scum, to their outriders, to Pasternack, and all the other little netstalkers before you, sucker fish bragging (temporarily) that they swim with a shark. So your excuse is now that even if you cannot deny the evidence of years of photographs and widely available net references, that you just don't believe the amp exists because you can't prove any lies against me. What a novel idea of truth you have, Pinkerton. (Did you learn it at engineering school. Or is that why no one will give you a job as an engineer and you have to work in a postroom?) Having been called on KISS as vapourware for more than a year, By the psychopath Pinkerton who simply will not accept mountains of evidence, all of it contrary to his prejudice. he *now* claims that it's been around for years? I don't think so........ I don't have to "claim" it has been around for years. Google demonstrates amply that it has been around since at least 2003; independent witnesses abound. If you weren't such an electronic blockhead, Pinkerton, in addition to being a bully, a fool and and a psychopath, you would be able to trace the T39 Mk VI which is the KISS Ultrafi type number, back to my Types 29, 30, 33 and 36 and at least five earlier incarnations of the T39 going back to the early 1990s, and the KiSS "Populaire" back to my Modular Amp "Lundahl" series of a decade ago. In fact, if you didn't have a one-second attention span, you could have read this genealogical history for a year now on my site in the KISS materials he http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/ -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering This thread was started to demonstrate that Stewart Pinkerton rewrites history to suit his irrational hatreds. It has succeeded beyond my fondest expectations. Unsigned out of contempt for scum |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk