![]() |
Soundstage and depth of image
"Trevor Wilson" wrote **Delusion is the explanation. The idea of building something tends to convey a feeling that the builder has constructed the finest sounding product possible. Normal human emotion, but often has no relation to reality. I really love this one - simply being able to trot this ******** out conveys to me that the writer is getting carried away by his own prejudices. I know of *no* DIYer who isn't dubious/unsure about his own products or who doesn't elicit opinions from others. I *am* aware that many DIYers spend endless amounts of time tweaking their creations until they're happy with them and I suspect some are *never* truly happy with them..... Do try to keep it real.... Their imaging is just part of their attraction and probably just a function of their great speed,dynamics and clarity-traits often attributed to SETs. **Speed, clarity, dynamics? Attributed to SETs? Not in this universe. SETs wash out detail and lack clarity. That is what makes them so popular. So popular? Make your mind up - next you'll be telling us how *few* people use them.... But what a stupid, ****ing remark that was - I for one doubt you have ever heard a SET amplifier.** Clarity and detail is the very reason I use SET amps and I got there by trying just about everything else....!! Coupled with hopelessly engineered recordings, a SET amp can mask all the rubbish inserted by engineers and musicians. I think you're ready for a career change..... ** If I'm wrong please feel free to cite examples of which make/model with which valves, as well as times and places and what sources, music and speakers were used.... |
Soundstage and depth of image
wrote snip A mile of ********, from what I could see of it.... |
Soundstage and depth of image
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "Trevor Wilson" wrote **Delusion is the explanation. The idea of building something tends to convey a feeling that the builder has constructed the finest sounding product possible. Normal human emotion, but often has no relation to reality. I really love this one - simply being able to trot this ******** out conveys to me that the writer is getting carried away by his own prejudices. **Nope. I deal in facts, not delusions. I know of *no* DIYer who isn't dubious/unsure about his own products or who doesn't elicit opinions from others. **Well, I'm here to tell you that I meet them all the time. Here's ONE example which sticks in my mind: I sold a properly manufactured, Zero Global NFB, full complementary preamp to a client. The product specc'd out at around 0.05% THD (20Hz - 20kHz) and similar levels of IMD. Frequency response is 0.5dB from DC to 150kHz. S/N is in excess of 100dB. IOW: No serious objective flaws. Sonically, it is enjoyed by many. The client is a technical person, who fancied himself as a person who could make improvements. He called me and asked me to pop over, so I could judge his latest 'improvement', in view of selling it to the manufacturer. I sat down, ready to carefully listen. He had built a much more sophisticated and very large power supply for his preamp. He had managed to inject a hum level of what I judged to be around -50dB and, as near as I could tell, he had completely screwed the soundstage, such that it was now artificially broad and shallow. Sheesh! Just the hum was annoying, yet he kept claiming that the thing sound great. Typical. I've got a million of them. Another client brought his homemade gear (along with his wife) over to demonstrate. We sat down and listened. I hear dproblems, but decided not to embarrass him in front of his wife. Then I played my reference equipment (not expensive, BTW). His wife exclaimed: "That's it darling. That's the sound I like." I *am* aware that many DIYers spend endless amounts of time tweaking their creations until they're happy with them and I suspect some are *never* truly happy with them..... **And in many cases, rightly so. I do not want to suggest that DIYers cannot get it right. Many can and do. It's just that they have zero objectivity. Do try to keep it real.... **That's just it. I DO keep it real. I deal in facts, not fantasy. Their imaging is just part of their attraction and probably just a function of their great speed,dynamics and clarity-traits often attributed to SETs. **Speed, clarity, dynamics? Attributed to SETs? Not in this universe. SETs wash out detail and lack clarity. That is what makes them so popular. So popular? **Sure. Lots of people (in the enthusiast community) have owned them. Make your mind up - next you'll be telling us how *few* people use them.... **Sure. But what a stupid, ****ing remark that was - I for one doubt you have ever heard a SET amplifier.** **Doubt all you wish. I've heard many. In some cases, in the same system. The reality is that different SET amps sound fundamentally different to each other. They can't all be right. OTOH, they all could be wrong. Clarity and detail is the very reason I use SET amps and I got there by trying just about everything else....!! **You did not try EVERYTHING else. You just tried some stuff which was easy/cheap for you to lay your hands on. Coupled with hopelessly engineered recordings, a SET amp can mask all the rubbish inserted by engineers and musicians. I think you're ready for a career change..... **What? Just because I deal in the truth? -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Soundstage and depth of image
wrote in message oups.com... Trevor, Keep the spin coming Trevor.Or is it just dogma? **I deal in facts. I have used power OP amps many times, over many years. They're cheap, convenient, easy to use and adequate performers. High end they ain't. The Gainclone chip amps were evolved by the former Head of Design at Luxman.This is the man who dared to make tube amps and low negative feedback SS amps at Luxman during the 1970s when it was very unfashionable.[The Duo Beta series of SS amps] His amp and preamp designs are noted for their ability to image precisely[relatively anyway], which is something very rare in mainstream equipment from that era.Clearly he discovered similar traits with chip amps and this motivated him to start 47 Labs. **The people behind 47 Labs are niave con-men. The site is full of nonsensical terminology and outright lies. These things are not perfect,and the component cost might be low-but they really do put to shame even expensive and well designed SS amps when it comes to imaging precision and depth.Especially those with high damping factors and feedback. **Sure they probably do, since there are quite a few badly designed amplifiers on the market. There are also a huge number of properly designed amps on the market. Many use the same power OP amps that Gainclones use. Mostly, they're cheap as chips. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com SNIP Hearsay and utter, banal nonsense. **Here's some gems from those liars at 47 Labs: a.. World's smallest number of parts - 9 parts per channel ( excluding attenuators ) a.. World's shortest signal pass length - 32 m/m ( including the length of parts ) a.. World's shortest NFB loop length - 9 m/m ( including the length of the resistor ) a.. World's smallest filter/condenser - 1000µF, (50W version - 2200µF) a.. Rigid and compact aluminum chassis construction to release vibrations smoothly. Of course, there's much, much more. Let's not even get into the pricing of these ridiculous products. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Soundstage and depth of image
Trevor Wilson wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Trevor, Keep the spin coming Trevor.Or is it just dogma? **I deal in facts. I have used power OP amps many times, over many years. They're cheap, convenient, easy to use and adequate performers. High end they ain't. The Gainclone chip amps were evolved by the former Head of Design at Luxman.This is the man who dared to make tube amps and low negative feedback SS amps at Luxman during the 1970s when it was very unfashionable.[The Duo Beta series of SS amps] His amp and preamp designs are noted for their ability to image precisely[relatively anyway], which is something very rare in mainstream equipment from that era.Clearly he discovered similar traits with chip amps and this motivated him to start 47 Labs. **The people behind 47 Labs are niave con-men. The site is full of nonsensical terminology and outright lies. These things are not perfect,and the component cost might be low-but they really do put to shame even expensive and well designed SS amps when it comes to imaging precision and depth.Especially those with high damping factors and feedback. **Sure they probably do, since there are quite a few badly designed amplifiers on the market. There are also a huge number of properly designed amps on the market. Many use the same power OP amps that Gainclones use. Mostly, they're cheap as chips. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com SNIP Hearsay and utter, banal nonsense. **Here's some gems from those liars at 47 Labs: a.. World's smallest number of parts - 9 parts per channel ( excluding attenuators ) a.. World's shortest signal pass length - 32 m/m ( including the length of parts ) a.. World's shortest NFB loop length - 9 m/m ( including the length of the resistor ) a.. World's smallest filter/condenser - 1000µF, (50W version - 2200µF) a.. Rigid and compact aluminum chassis construction to release vibrations smoothly. Of course, there's much, much more. Let's not even get into the pricing of these ridiculous products. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Trevor, I agree completely with you about the pricing but the hi fi world is full of products which cost an absurd amount relative to the cost of their parts or construction.In fact this is almost standard for most high end products.How about Wilson and Avalon speakers for example? Similar but more powerful chip amps can be bought as kits for around US $300 and in this context they are a bargain. This topic began with a bloke frustrated with not being able to get decent imaging in his system. Many people never achieve this in their systems but there is signifigant anectodal evidence available through forums like this one that chip amps deliver the goods in this regard.What is most convincing about this evidence is that many people who make such comments already have excellent and expensive systems and are not some DIY punter that has no idea of what good sound is. I suggested that this bloke might want to try a chip amp as one of several things to consider in improving imaging on the back of this not inconsiderable anectdotal experience.It might not help his system or it might resolve the problem comprehensively.What is the harm in trying it though? Why should your opinion and experience count more than others ? You can justify any position using technical arguements.But are they the applicable ones?.You might want to take up the cause of Intelligent Design.-a group of similar mentallity Thought Police. |
Soundstage and depth of image
wrote in message ups.com... Trevor Wilson wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Trevor, Keep the spin coming Trevor.Or is it just dogma? **I deal in facts. I have used power OP amps many times, over many years. They're cheap, convenient, easy to use and adequate performers. High end they ain't. The Gainclone chip amps were evolved by the former Head of Design at Luxman.This is the man who dared to make tube amps and low negative feedback SS amps at Luxman during the 1970s when it was very unfashionable.[The Duo Beta series of SS amps] His amp and preamp designs are noted for their ability to image precisely[relatively anyway], which is something very rare in mainstream equipment from that era.Clearly he discovered similar traits with chip amps and this motivated him to start 47 Labs. **The people behind 47 Labs are niave con-men. The site is full of nonsensical terminology and outright lies. These things are not perfect,and the component cost might be low-but they really do put to shame even expensive and well designed SS amps when it comes to imaging precision and depth.Especially those with high damping factors and feedback. **Sure they probably do, since there are quite a few badly designed amplifiers on the market. There are also a huge number of properly designed amps on the market. Many use the same power OP amps that Gainclones use. Mostly, they're cheap as chips. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com SNIP Hearsay and utter, banal nonsense. **Here's some gems from those liars at 47 Labs: a.. World's smallest number of parts - 9 parts per channel ( excluding attenuators ) a.. World's shortest signal pass length - 32 m/m ( including the length of parts ) a.. World's shortest NFB loop length - 9 m/m ( including the length of the resistor ) a.. World's smallest filter/condenser - 1000µF, (50W version - 2200µF) a.. Rigid and compact aluminum chassis construction to release vibrations smoothly. Of course, there's much, much more. Let's not even get into the pricing of these ridiculous products. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Trevor, I agree completely with you about the pricing but the hi fi world is full of products which cost an absurd amount relative to the cost of their parts or construction. **Non-sequitur. In fact this is almost standard for most high end products.How about Wilson and Avalon speakers for example? **Non-sequitur. Similar but more powerful chip amps can be bought as kits for around US $300 and in this context they are a bargain. **Huh? In what sense are 47 Labs products "bargains"? This topic began with a bloke frustrated with not being able to get decent imaging in his system. **And your explanation that it was likely to be a room problem was a good one. I concur. I also noted that he was listening through a valve preamp. That, IME, can also contribute to an overblown image. Many people never achieve this in their systems but there is signifigant anectodal evidence available through forums like this one that chip amps deliver the goods in this regard. **Power OP amps can certainly deliver respectable performance, for not much money. I never denied that. What I do attack is the notion that they are "simple" or that there is some kind of magic in their use. They are cheap, convenient and tough. Nothing more. Their sound quality is OK. Nothing more. It is for those reasons that they are found in cheap bottom of the line hi fi systems. What is most convincing about this evidence is that many people who make such comments already have excellent and expensive systems and are not some DIY punter that has no idea of what good sound is. I suggested that this bloke might want to try a chip amp as one of several things to consider in improving imaging on the back of this not inconsiderable anectdotal experience.It might not help his system or it might resolve the problem comprehensively.What is the harm in trying it though? **None at all. It would probably be easier, cheaper and faster to buy a decent, mass market product first, however. A budget Rotel would do the trick quite nicely and offer far better performance, into a wider range of loads than any power OP amp. Why should your opinion and experience count more than others ? **Because it is based on actual experience and a great deal of technical knowledge. I KNOW why power OP amps sound the way they do. You can justify any position using technical arguements.But are they the applicable ones? **Of course. There's no Supernatural. There's just reality. ..You might want to take up the cause of Intelligent Design.-a group of similar mentallity Thought Police. **Like I said: There's no Supernatural. Intelligent Design is just Creationism dressed up. The people behind and those who support 47 Labs probably buy into such nonsense. I don't. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Soundstage and depth of image
In article . com,
wrote: Eiron wrote: e with high damping factors and feedback. JT - you really don't understand how a 'Gainclone' amp works. There is very little design or 'evolving' involved. You just buy a two dollar chip and copy the circuit from the manufacturer's datasheet. If you read the datasheet you will see that the amp is a power opamp, and is used with plenty of global negative feedback. Eiron, The Gainclones then prove to be an exception to a well held opinion. Thus indicating that an opinion being "well held" does not mean it has any actual value. :-) Perhaps there is something in their circuit topography then that is different, or the way in which negative feedback is applied.They have much shorter signal paths and are very simple.Maybe this makes a big difference ,and perhaps feedback applied in this context is sonically less obvious. So this should make them even more fascinating. Or maybe none of the above. :-) Maybe SS amp builders can learn something from them rather than dismiss them because they are not complex enough . Elron wasn't dismissing them. He was pointing out the inconsistency of your previous comments. [snip yet more "well held opinions" :-) ] Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
Soundstage and depth of image
In article , Trevor Wilson
wrote: wrote in message Maybe SS amp builders can learn something from them rather than dismiss them because they are not complex enough . **THEY ARE COMPLEX. Very complex. It's just that from the outside they appear to be simple. It is their simplicity and low which makes them attractive to low end amplifier manufacturers. This is why you find them in $199.00 all in one systems. Cheap, easy to use and hard to destroy. Indeed. The advantage of using an IC as in the gainclone is that all the complexity is 'hidden' inside one small pack with just a few leads - making it easy for someone who lacks experience to use it to make an amp. The disadvantage of using an IC as in the gainclone is that all the complexity is 'hidden' inside one small pack with just a few leads - thus making any alteration of the complex circuit details inaccessible to an experienced or knowledgeable designer who might want to alter details to get improved performance or avoid some of the limitations of the IC. Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
Soundstage and depth of image
In article , Keith G
wrote: wrote snip A mile of ********, from what I could see of it.... We seem to agree on this - although as someone who changed to SI, I guess I should say 'kilometer'... :-) Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
Soundstage and depth of image
In article .com,
wrote: While a single Power Humpty can run the entire unit, you can use a second Power Humpty for true dual mono operation. Presumably only if each is driven off its own mains generator? -- *What was the best thing before sliced bread? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk