"keith ratbag = utter MORON from HELL "
That is strange because Sony only considered it a medium quality product,
** Absurd CRAPOLOGY.
as the name indicates - 101 binary for 5 or 5 out of 10. If you don't
believe it check this link:-
http://www.sony.net/Fun/SH/1-20/h5.html
** Complete pile of DRIVEL and UTTER ******** written by god knows what
****wit in Sony's marketing department after drinking far too much Saki !!!
It was of course *Philips* who originally conceived and developed the CD
system, inviting Sony into the game at a late stage and so Philips had
priority in model naming. It was simply not on to both of them use the
number 100 on their first models.
The CD100 model Philips developed was very basic with few features ( not
even remote control) - plus it employed 14 bit D to A converters cos
Philips simply had no 16 bit ones available.
However, Sony's engineers took a little longer to finalise their first CD
player design, producing a very different product from the Philips
achine - the fully featured CDP101 was anything but basic, it came with
the lot.
Sony also elected to develop the first true 16 bit D to A converter IC for
the CDP101.
Sony were clearly out to "upstage" Philips with their first CD player and
succeeded.
...... Phil