![]() |
Frequency response of the ear
"Jim Lesurf" wrote Dunno. She may be typical of those who feel it is still worth the effort of buying a CD. Can't be many of those left these days! ;-) |
Frequency response of the ear
In article , Jim Lesurf
wrote: In article , Iain Churches wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... You probably won't get far with one phone call. If your really feel that you have been short-changed them some determination in getting the matter sorted out, is required. I remember I once gave you a "hot line" telephone number for EMI quality control. Did you ever follow it up? Yes. That was the most recent experience that confirmed my previous conclusions. I phoned the number, only to find that no-one there knew what I was talking about. Over a period of 2-3 weeks I phoned (and then emailed) a number of people at EMI. No-one sorted out the problem or took what I said seriously. The attitude was "if the CD is faulty, get a replacement" regardless of my pointing out that I *had* tried *four* replacements and they were all showing the same problem. A production fault. To clarify further. IIRC you were saying that the manufactuers would be wanting to know about my discovering a possible factory fault that affected many CDs in a batch, and would be happy to replace it themselves rather than tell me to speak to the retailer. You gave me a phone number to try this. I did phone, and was passed around, put onto answerphones, given 'press 7 to get another answerphone', 'try Fred or Bill', etc, etc, for some weeks. So far as I recall, no-one seemed to have any idea that something might be done about a possible faulty batch of CDs. No-one was interested in replacing it from the company itself. All I got was a runaround with suggestions I return the CD (again) to the retailer. Frankly, the whole excercise was a waste of my time. I only persisted for some days to try and see if I could get anywhere because you seemed certain I would. By contrast the retailer were sympathetic and helpful - but could only keep sending me 'new' copies that had the same problem. Note though that I only mention EMI here as they were the specific example I tried at your suggestion. I have no reason to think they are poorer than other big music companies. Although I would suspect that some of the small specialists would be rather better. In practice, though, this generally doesn't matter with classical CDs as I find that almost all CDs play fine with no sign of factory faults. This is true for EMI just as for other companies. For me, this is the big contrast with the old days of LPs. I did report this to you at the time IIRC so I am surprised that you seem to have forgotten. If you hadn't asked again I would not have mentioned it at length. Slainte, Jim -- Change 'noise' to 'jcgl' if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Frequency response of the ear
In article , Keith G
wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote Dunno. She may be typical of those who feel it is still worth the effort of buying a CD. Can't be many of those left these days! ;-) Dunno as I don't have uptodate figures. But I suspect there may be more buyers of CDs than LPs at present. :-) Indeed, I wonder if more classical CDs are sold than LPs. Shame that the BPI seem to treat detailed figures as if they are a commercial secret for some reason. Slainte, Jim -- Change 'noise' to 'jcgl' if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Frequency response of the ear
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote Dunno. She may be typical of those who feel it is still worth the effort of buying a CD. Can't be many of those left these days! ;-) Dunno as I don't have uptodate figures. But I suspect there may be more buyers of CDs than LPs at present. :-) Indeed, I wonder if more classical CDs are sold than LPs. Shame that the BPI seem to treat detailed figures as if they are a commercial secret for some reason. My guess is that the last of the *CD buyers* will be those of the 'classical persuasion' with the more modern stuff and all 'pop' going the way of the 'Net, iPod, cellphone and whatever else they come up with! |
Frequency response of the ear
"Iain Churches" wrote in message
... "David Looser" wrote in message ... "Iain Churches" wrote in message ... "Laurence Payne" wrote in message My constant plea to sound professionals is "turn it down" whether it's overall level at a live gig or monitor levels at a recording. I agree about live gigs, and in many cinemas also. Cinema sound levels are, in theory at least, set by the studio, not the cinema. A cinema's sound system is calibrated to a particular SPL, so if the film is played at the recommended setting of the volume control then the SPL heard in the cinema should be the same as that heard by the sound mixers during dubbing. Having done quite a lot of music editing/mixing for corporate film/video productions, I was invited to take part in a film mixing course for SDDS (Sony Digital DynamicSound) The fixed control room levels were pretty scary! The arrangement of channels was similar to 70mm mag. For SDDS. Digital sound information was recorded on the outer edges of the 35mm film print. There were up to 8 independent channels of sound: 5 at the front, 2 surround channels and a sub-bass channel. Very few cinemas have 5 channels at the front, latterly 70mm mag was only using 3 channels for the front and using the other two for split surrounds and bass enhancement. The format weas discontinued, I have long since mis-laid the course diploma but I do still have the huge blue-glazed coffee mug with SDDS in gold leaf on the side:-)) I wasn't aware that it had been discontinued, new releases are still coming out with the "SDDS" logo after the credits alongside the "Dolby" and "DTS" logos. Mind you if it has been discontinued no one would notice, the letters, apparently, *really* stand for "Still Doesn't Do ****". It was just a pointless "Me Too" attempt by Sony to grab some of the cinema sound business from Dolby and DTS. David. |
Frequency response of the ear
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Jim Lesurf wrote: In article , Iain Churches wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... You probably won't get far with one phone call. If your really feel that you have been short-changed them some determination in getting the matter sorted out, is required. I remember I once gave you a "hot line" telephone number for EMI quality control. Did you ever follow it up? Yes. That was the most recent experience that confirmed my previous conclusions. I phoned the number, only to find that no-one there knew what I was talking about. Over a period of 2-3 weeks I phoned (and then emailed) a number of people at EMI. No-one sorted out the problem or took what I said seriously. The attitude was "if the CD is faulty, get a replacement" regardless of my pointing out that I *had* tried *four* replacements and they were all showing the same problem. A production fault. There seems to have been a failure here to undersrand what was the precise nature of your complaint. A replacement CD was not the answer:-( To clarify further. IIRC you were saying that the manufactuers would be wanting to know about my discovering a possible factory fault that affected many CDs in a batch, and would be happy to replace it themselves rather than tell me to speak to the retailer. You gave me a phone number to try this. I did phone, and was passed around, put onto answerphones, given 'press 7 to get another answerphone', 'try Fred or Bill', etc, etc, for some weeks. So far as I recall, no-one seemed to have any idea that something might be done about a possible faulty batch of CDs. No-one was interested in replacing it from the company itself. All I got was a runaround with suggestions I return the CD (again) to the retailer. Frankly, the whole excercise was a waste of my time. I only persisted for some days to try and see if I could get anywhere because you seemed certain I would. By contrast the retailer were sympathetic and helpful - but could only keep sending me 'new' copies that had the same problem. So no-one promised to see if they could "get to the bottom of the matter"? Note though that I only mention EMI here as they were the specific example I tried at your suggestion. I have no reason to think they are poorer than other big music companies. Although I would suspect that some of the small specialists would be rather better. No.I think they are actually worse. Their production is handled by third party plants. In practice, though, this generally doesn't matter with classical CDs as I find that almost all CDs play fine with no sign of factory faults. This is true for EMI just as for other companies. For me, this is the big contrast with the old days of LPs. I did report this to you at the time IIRC so I am surprised that you seem to have forgotten. If you hadn't asked again I would not have mentioned it at length. Jim, the last time we talked about this, IIRC you said, "I have reported the problem, and am waiting to hear back from them" Presumably youn never did:-( Iain |
Frequency response of the ear
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote Dunno. She may be typical of those who feel it is still worth the effort of buying a CD. Can't be many of those left these days! ;-) Dunno as I don't have uptodate figures. But I suspect there may be more buyers of CDs than LPs at present. :-) That's a fairly safe bet, I would say.:-) But stocks of the new LPs that are made available are exhausted very quickly. Pressing companies seem to have resisted the temptation to over-run the stampers. A waiting list for new pressings seems much more desirable/newsworthy. Indeed, I wonder if more classical CDs are sold than LPs. Shame that the BPI seem to treat detailed figures as if they are a commercial secret for some reason. Do you need a "hot-line" nunber for the BPI also, Jim? :-) Their press/PR secretary has all the facts and figs at his fingertips. Iain |
Frequency response of the ear
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Iain Churches wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... I agree. People (including myself) eventually decide it is a waste of time to complain if previous attempts at feedback produce no useful outcome. i guess people have no interest in keeping meeedia suits in a job. You probably won't get far with one phone call. If your really feel that you have been short-changed them some determination in getting the matter sorted out, is required. I remember I once gave you a "hot line" telephone number for EMI quality control. Did you ever follow it up? Yes. That was the most recent experience that confirmed my previous conclusions. I phoned the number, only to find that no-one there knew what I was talking about. Over a period of 2-3 weeks I phoned (and then emailed) a number of people at EMI. No-one sorted out the problem or took what I said seriously. The attitude was "if the CD is faulty, get a replacement" regardless of my pointing out that I *had* tried *four* replacements and they were all showing the same problem. A production fault. Afraid, Iain, that my experience confirmed I was wasting my time. That's a very surprising (lack of a) result. One might expect a shrug of the shoulder from a small independent label, but a large company should be able to put you through to someone who understands that you are talking about a production fault: Did no-one say to you. "Let me dig out the archive CD. I will play it, and get back to you within the hour" ?? My experience over many decades is otherwise, I'm afraid. I have often complained, or asked for help. In general, nothing useful results.' You seem ready to accept that nothing can be done. Most retailers are probably not a bit interested, and can only offer you "another one the same" so one has to go back to the label. Admittedly the 'young people' I talk to tend to be in the 17-25 year old range. Maybe this is too old for the group you have in mind. No. That's the perfect range. One young lady said just recently. "I buy 10-15 CDs at a time. If I don't like a couple of them, I just swop them, or give them away" :-) She may well be typical. Who knows? Dunno. She may be typical of those who feel it is still worth the effort of buying a CD. Can't say from just one as that makes assessment of statistical significance impossible. But the vital point is that may not tell us much about those who don't bother to buy CDs as it seems a waste of time to them. I think you ae generalising there, Jim. Besides which, are not download files 256kb .mp4s? They might be even worse than the CD :-) The problem with 'examples' like the one you quote is that they fall into a well-known statistical flaw. If you go into a pub and ask the people there, "How many of you have been killed as a result of driving faster than the speed limit?" the response will probably indicate that no-one has. This does not mean speeding is 'safe'. It just means you are preselecting the group you are surveying to make mince of your conclusions. The error is drawing an conclusion as a result of making a false assumption about what you can deduce from the 'evidence'.' Yes I realise that. But I think this illustrates that most people don't regard the quality as being important. Music has become much more transitory. Even if one could talk to 1 000 people, it might not be a large enough sample. My experience is that the above is quite a fair analogy for the waymuch of the pop/rock part of the music biz has proceeded to regard the 'market'. Sorry if you don't see this, but tragic if they don't... GIGO. I think you will just have to accept that perhaps the majority-held view (which may be erronious:-) is different to your own. Sad, I agree. Regards Iain |
Frequency response of the ear
In article , Keith G
wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... Indeed, I wonder if more classical CDs are sold than LPs. Shame that the BPI seem to treat detailed figures as if they are a commercial secret for some reason. My guess is that the last of the *CD buyers* will be those of the 'classical persuasion' with the more modern stuff and all 'pop' going the way of the 'Net, iPod, cellphone and whatever else they come up with! You may be correct, although I'd probably use "LPCM" in the above as distinct from lossy compression schemes. Slainte, Jim -- Change 'noise' to 'jcgl' if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Frequency response of the ear
In article , Iain Churches
wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Jim Lesurf wrote: There seems to have been a failure here to undersrand what was the precise nature of your complaint. A replacement CD was not the answer:-( Indeed. So no-one promised to see if they could "get to the bottom of the matter"? I can't recall specifics now, but I think I did get various comments about checking things... cf below. Note though that I only mention EMI here as they were the specific example I tried at your suggestion. I have no reason to think they are poorer than other big music companies. Although I would suspect that some of the small specialists would be rather better. No.I think they are actually worse. Their production is handled by third party plants. I know than many used to use PDO as I had some of the 'brown rot' CDs. However my experience with small specialist classical marques is that their quality is high. Can't comment on pop/rock so much. In practice, though, this generally doesn't matter with classical CDs as I find that almost all CDs play fine with no sign of factory faults. This is true for EMI just as for other companies. For me, this is the big contrast with the old days of LPs. I did report this to you at the time IIRC so I am surprised that you seem to have forgotten. If you hadn't asked again I would not have mentioned it at length. Jim, the last time we talked about this, IIRC you said, "I have reported the problem, and am waiting to hear back from them" Presumably youn never did:-( Correct. In the end I did start playing the "I do write audio articles and I am now looking at this, can you help me?" to see if that prompted a more attentive response. I did exchange emails and phone calls with people. But never managed to establish anything like "yes there was a factory problem with that batch". No real response. The presumption was that either A) The individual CD was faulty - return to retailer. or B) All my players were poor - change them. In the end I did find one player that could play one of the CDs. This is the Rega Apollo which seems very good with dubious CDs - although it does struggle with some other types of disc that play well in the other machines I have. I also did eventually get a 'good' copy of the CD which was provided for me by someone else who has nothing to do with EMI or the factory. It was an interesting experiment which I may write up one day. But the results were as I'd suspected on the basis of trying to deal with faulty LPs many years ago. Waste of time expecting the company to deal with the 'complaint' seriously. Whoever's job it might be to deal with issues like this, it was never the person I was speaking to, and they didn't know who was responsible, or could tell me their name or phone number. People were friendly and sympathetic though, so I have no complaint about any of the people I spoke to. Just that I found no sign that the company had any way of dealing with such an issue reported by a mere customer. Afraid this squares with what I've heard from retailers over the years as well. Slainte, Jim -- Change 'noise' to 'jcgl' if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk