![]() |
Hello valve lovers, wherever you are.
In article ,
Andy Evans wrote: it's just that the atmosphere in this ng is putrid because of its constant pests. And you're very much in danger of becoming one. Perhaps you need a valve only group where your 'views' wouldn't be challenged? -- *A backward poet writes inverse.* Dave Plowman London SW 12 RIP Acorn |
Hello valve lovers, wherever you are.
Silicon is best .. accept it ... but like you, I will carry on listening to
what I've got until they invent something better Hello Jim - if I read you correctly you are saying: a) I like valves and listen to them because I haven't yet heard any better - if I did I'd probably switch b) There is a 'best' and a 'not best' I'd agree completely with a), though I'd worry that if - say - a digital amp came along that smoked all my valve gear, I'd be left with several boxes of redundant parts. It hasn't happened yet, but of course it could. I think that with b) we are falling into the kind of competitiveness that is destroying this newsgroup. One of the contributors to this thread very sensibly suggested that we substitute 'better for the purpose it is used for' which is a lot more flexible. What do you think? Cheers, Andy === Andy Evans === Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com Audio, music and health pages and interesting links. |
Hello valve lovers, wherever you are.
Don't even bother trying - you won't be able to do it. You use AOL, whose news
reader is even worse (if that were possible) than Outlook Express. Hello Don - yes, this is what I've been told before. I've been given different news reader options but haven't got round to them. I'm just about to grapple with broadband, then after that try to modernise my website. So much to do, so little time. Thanks for posting, Andy === Andy Evans === Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com Audio, music and health pages and interesting links. |
Hello valve lovers, wherever you are.
|
Hello valve lovers, wherever you are.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:53:56 +0100, Kurt Hamster
wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:49:39 GMT, Stewart Pinkerton used to say... Yup, and the E-type Jag was a great car - in the sixties...... Now even my wife's Audi TT will blow the doors off an E-type, Even so, I know which I would prefer, and it wouldn't be character-free vorsprung durch tecnik. I take it that you've never driven a TT. One thing it does not lack is character. Granted, I'd like a 1963 mkI 4.2 E-type coupe as well, for a weekend toy. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Hello valve lovers, wherever you are.
|
Hello valve lovers, wherever you are.
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: "Andy Evans" wrote In less than a minute the Kit88 valve amp had blown the Technics (MY Technics, no less) into the weeds! I would be interested to know your reactions if you first fitted a pair of resistors in series with the outputs of the Technics. Values of around 0.47 to 1 Ohms between each output and the speaker. This would roughly mimic the relatively high output impedances typical of valve amps. I'd be curious to know if, after listening, you felt this changed things in a way that made you feel that the Technics now sounded more like the valve amp. OK, so far the amp has been playing all afternoon in the background with the resistors fitted thus http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit.../resistors.jpg (speaker wires connected to the B terminals) as per Stewart's suggestion. Neither Swim nor I have been listening very closely (both been busy), but at this stage I can report hearing no difference whatsoever. Swim, OTOH, 'guesses' she can hear: 'less fulsome', slight graininess' and 'possibly a little recessive' when the B setting is used (She is completely 'blind' in this and has no idea how I have the amp wired up.) However, when pressed she also admits it all might be imagined....? We will conduct a better 'test session' either later tonight or sometime over the weekend. If there is nothing conclusive, I will take the resistors out and chop them straight into a set of wires and try 'with and without' games with wires. I will also show her how to switch between A and B (dead easy) so that I can try to discern a difference. If a clear and consistent pattern does evolve I will report that back here, otherwise take it that we can't tell them apart. As it appears that the low volume of traffic in 'ukrav' (so far) is being 'monitored' by someone here who thinks a mile long, acrimonious bashing session in ukra counts as 'normal traffic', I feel disinclined to feed this group with my fun and games. (Public experimentation and 'soft trolls'...) A week or so ago this group was down to about 3 posts a day (guess who from). Perhaps it's time for one or two of us to let it ride and see what this group really adds up to, if left to its own devices...... |
Hello valve lovers, wherever you are.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:52:27 +0100, Kurt Hamster
wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:04:06 GMT, Stewart Pinkerton used to say... If you'd been skilled as well as careful, you'd have been designing and building solid-state amplifiers! :-) Instead of working in, say, a bank? Probably, but since I've never worked in a bank, I wouldn't know..... -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Hello valve lovers, wherever you are.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:51:35 +0100, Kurt Hamster
wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:04:06 GMT, Stewart Pinkerton used to say... On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:53:56 +0100, Kurt Hamster wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:49:39 GMT, Stewart Pinkerton used to say... Yup, and the E-type Jag was a great car - in the sixties...... Now even my wife's Audi TT will blow the doors off an E-type, Even so, I know which I would prefer, and it wouldn't be character-free vorsprung durch tecnik. I take it that you've never driven a TT. Then you take it wrong. In which case, you just don't understand integrity and character. I've never yet sat in either a VW or an Audio that I would consider as characterful. The closest was a Quattro, but even that had a bit too much teutonic blandness about it. Are you *sure* that you've driven a TT? One thing it does not lack is character. Granted, I'd like a 1963 mkI 4.2 E-type coupe as well, for a weekend toy. If we're talking 'likes' then I'm afraid it will be (and has been) for an awfully long time time a GT40. 456 GT for me. It's just totally *right*. Or 500 Superamerica if we're talking about long-term drooling. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk