Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale Diamond II's (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/2443-valve-amp-preferably-diy-drive.html)

Ian Molton November 11th 04 09:59 PM

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale DiamondII's
 
Kurt Hamster wrote:

So SS amps are no longer have a central role in a SS system then?


Did they ever? and anyway, what do you consider the 'centre' of an audio
system?

in a proper SS setup (ie. one that is *capable of* linear, distortion
free reproduction) one would be able to apply tone control of various
types in order to generate any desired output characteristics.



Which have **** all do do with anything as the converse is also true
given the relevant EQ etc etc etc...


What if the valve amps distortion has a non-reversible transfer
function? un-eq-ing distortion is not always possible.

since when was better a subjective term. it requires a context.


Better has always been a subjective term which is exactly why it needs a
context duh!


If its meaningless out of context why do the valvies insist on using it so?

That is something the meter readers fail to comprehend.


On the contrary. my meter reader helps get my gas bills right, and they
get worse every time...


Try using less gas then!


in winter, compared to summer? fat chance!


Ian Molton November 11th 04 10:00 PM

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale DiamondII's
 
Kurt Hamster wrote:

Now what was it you were saying in another post about "paying
attention"?


Difference is that you used your incorrect reading of my post to launch
into a(nother) run of derogatory comments.


Keith G November 11th 04 10:28 PM

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale Diamond II's
 

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message
...

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message
...

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message
...

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Trevor Wilson" wrote


Additionally, if the input is sublimely perfect, any amp which
distorts, will ruin the goodness.


Sublimely perfect input??? Got any?

**Several.


You do?

**Yes.

What are they?

**You're joking, right? The list is too long to mention here.


Oh, sure...

OK, just two or three then - to give us an idea. Only we get to hear
all about this 'crappy amps' and 'perfect inputs' but we *never* get
any examples. The reason is too obvious to be worth a mention......

**I fail to see the point, but I'll grab a couple from my shelf, above
my bench, which I use for test purposes.
* Mary Black - Mission Demonstration disk
* Brahms - Cello Concertos (RCA)
* Chet Atkins - The Essential Chet Atkins
* Neil Diamond - You Don't Bring Me Flowers
* Christine Anu - Christine Anu

Happy now? What purpose did that serve.



Ah.

I thought you were talking about inputs as in *devices*......

(You know - what you get when you flick the 'Input Selector'....???)









Got an amp which *doesn't* distort?? Not at all???

**Several. None of which exhibit any AUDIBLE distortions. More to
the point: Do YOU have any amplifiers which exhibit no audible
distortions, when used with real-life loudspeakers?


None of my amps disort audibly that I or anyone else here can detect.

**Really? Can you provide your measurements to validate that fact?


Wake up dummy - read the words 'I' and 'can detect' again, also try to
get the notion that just a few of us actually *listen* to the music and
don't just watch it on a scope.....

**Now I understand. You KNOW that your amplifiers do not audibly
distort, but you have no way yo prove it. That makes sense.



Certainly it does - if music/voices on my kit didn't sound exactly like I
expect it/them to, I'd get rid.


**So, you have no way to verify what you think it should sound like? How
do you know that your source is accurate?



I don't - nor do I care.

I think you're confusing me with others here who are always whining about
'fidelity' and bull****ting about 'live events'. I don't worry about what I
can't check - provided the sound is as I *expect* it, then it'll do me.
Pause for a moment - this group is for hobbyists like me who are end users -
most of us aren't wannabee losers who are trying to kid themselves 'we're in
the trade'....

Know what I mean?


'



I have news for you: If your amps do not meet or exceed the parameters I
have outlined, they do, in fact, audibly distort.



Not that I can detect - why do you have a problem grasping this?


**You can't detect their distortions, because you've never measured them.



Why should I measure what doesn't bother me? - How anal do you have to be?
See above about 'end users'.

Isn't there a rec.audio.pro where all you 'trade whingers' could go instead
of cluttering up this general interest group??








snip bollockology

restore facts and figures, which you seem to be extremely uncomfortable
in discussing

Frequency response: 20Hz - 20kHz (at, say, 1/3rd full power) +/- 0.1dB,
when operating into a real-world loudspeaker.
Phase error: 20Hz - 20kHz - +/- 5 degrees, when operating into a
real-world
loudspeaker.
Output impedance: Lower than 0.1 Ohm, from 20Hz - 20kHz (BTW: This is
where
many run-of-the-mill SS amps fail)
THD: Less than 0.1% from 20Hz - 20kHz, at (say) 1/3rd maximum output.
IMD: Less than 0.1%.



Interesting/useful to a manufacturer or designer, of little importance to
the end user.


**Nope. Absolutely critical to the end user. There is no point building a
system around a faulty component.


???

Oh dear, don't tell me you're coming down with this 'flu.....???



Mention 'distortion' and 'flat response' to one or two people
I know in the racket and they'll laugh their arses off!


**Sure. There's stupid people in the racket. I'm in the racket


:-)


Lovely! ;-)



(and have been for 35 years) and consider those parameters to be very
important. In fact, unless a product meets those basic criteria, there's
little point considering it at all, since it will affect the sound of any
decent system negatively.






(What,
do you think we sit here listening to 'audible distortion'...??? :-)

**Yes.


Well, I reckon Swim's a better judge than yew, me auld china (played
clart in the presence of Queenie at the RCM and a colleague of Tony
Michaelson for 3 years or so) so it'll be alright if I go along with
her opinion and discard yours, will it?

**I have no idea who "Swim" is. So, no.



Swim = SWMBO

I put a clart piece on she says it's OK. I put it on a valve amp she says
it's 'very real'. I put it on the triode amp she says it's the 'most real
yet' - who am I to argue???


**I'm assuming that since her sensibilities coincide with yours, you
won't.








There's much tub-thumping about 'high fidelity' and 'straight wires
with gain' - like one type of amp absolutely fits these criteria
and another type don't.

**Few amplifiers actually fit that description, WHEN DRIVING REAL
LOUDSPEAKERS.


No need to shout, me auld shagger...

**There is, sometimes.


No, really, there isn't....

**Sure there is. You still seem to be hung up on:

Valves = Good
Transistors = Bad



Hmmm...


This is faulty logic.



You're not kidding....


There are some very fine valve amplifiers. There are some really bad
valve amplifiers. There are some very fine SS amplifiers and some really
bad SS amplifiers. Just because an amplifier uses a particular active
devices, does not automatically convey a measure of goodness (or badness)
on that product. However, at a given price level (assuming good design),
a SS amplifier will always outperform a valve amp.



I'm not sure what this is all leading up to. First off, I love all these
'qualified' statements we keep seeing like 'crappy valve amps' and 'at a
given price level', 'good design' etc. etc.

Next, I'm not nearly as convinced as you seem to be that we're tit-deep
in 'bad' amplifiers. Call it a sheltered upbringing if you like, but I'm
not sure I've ever heard a *bad* amplifier....???


**I have. Lots of them. Including the afore-mentioned Audiolab 8000A.


(Are bad amps like fleas? - The more you seek, the more you find and the
more you find, the happier you be??)


**In my business I get to see *a lot* of amplifiers. I usually listen to
the ones which demonstrate overtly interesting results on the test
equipment.



Stop for a moment and consider how fatuous those remarks are - you repair
busted amps for a living, I don't. I also don't buy *bad* amps (wouldn't
know how to do that) so, believe it or not, I don't get to see *bad*
amps.....

(It's like pulling teeth.......!!)


The most recent one being a Linn Intek. Quite a good amp, BTW.



No good to me matey - I'm up one more Chinese cheapy amp since we last
'spoke' :-)



Then you seem to be very comfortable presuming that I would choose *any*
valve amp over *any* ss amp, come what may?? Wrong, asitappens, but I've
yet to hear an ss amp I could live with other than during the single
week's hot weather we get in the UK...


**[GAG] Hot weather? You have no idea what hot weather really is. Trust me
on this. As it happens, the amp I use is specifically designed to operate
at an internal temperature of 60oC, regardless of the outside temperature
(provided the outside temperature does not exceed 60oC, of course).



Is that 60°C you mean...??

;-)


As for your selection of an SS amp, I suggest you use similar criteria to
that which would affect your choice of valve amps. Here's a few criteria
you could consider:
* Low Global NFB.
* No current limiters (or current limiters which operate in a benign
fashion).
* A good, big power supply, relative to power output. IOW: A nice, heavy,
low power output amp.
* Moderately high Class A operation.
* Collectors coupled to loads.

The afore-mentioned Linn Intek comes close to these parameters.



OK, OK

First off, I'm not in the market for another SS amp. Secondly, you provide
here a good opportunity to point out that this group's leading ****, who is
always banging on about how good valve amps cost a lot more than their ss
counterparts, has totally got his frilly little panties in a 180° twist on
this. You can get good 'valve attributes' (soundstage, clarity etc.) very
cheaply atm - I've just got another £250 valve amp that will, IME, **** all
over a £5/600 ss amp (no names, here...) in these respects, but to get
anything like the same attributes in an ss amp (as per your list above) you
are talking about an expensive amp over here, if bought off the shelf.
(Sugden A21 for example?)

IOW, the *opposite* of the **** continually being spouted in another
quarter....




(First thing to go with ss is the 'soundstage', you see.....)


**Not necessarily. Soundstage is affected by several things. All of which
can be addressed quite easily.



But not cheaply, methinks - if it ain't broke, why devise another way of
replicating it, FFS??









Quite a few manage it with dummy loads and sine waves, however.

(Not to mention whatever input or amp is used, the speakers and the
room will have the final say, in any case....)

**Strawman, duly noted.


Geekboy 'Usenet' terminology duly noted.....

**Strawman, duly noted.


Geekboy 'Usenet' terminology duly noted.....

**Your further strawman is duly noted.



Your further Geekboy 'Usenet' terminology duly noted.....





(You been talking to the other opinionated, non-UK loudmouth that
hangs around in here by any chance?)

**That depends.


Thought as much....


What does that tell you? They got no place in this ng for a start?

**Not at all. I have stated, ad nauseum, that a REALLY GOOD valve
amplifier


You're shouting again - do try to hold it together, there's a good
chap.

**Clearly I need to shout. You don't seem to pay attention.


Won't get (or keep) my attention by shouting muchacho, saying something
interesting is all it takes - try it.....

**I try to. You just ignore the truth. Just try to follow my logic, once
in awhile.



You have no logic, you have only prejudice and dogma....


**Nope. I have logic and experience on my side.



Experience (of fixing amps) - no arguemnet. Logic? Care to 'refresh my
memory' on this???

(The only logic I can see is that you are trying to persuade me that it is
possible to create an ss amp that will have the attributes that come
virtually FOC with an modest valve amp....???)








Who's discussing cheap, crappy valve amps?

**The original poster.


Oh ah? And where do you see that, then? Nothing in there that I could
see - he mentions a valve amp (preferably DIY) and that he's got a
budget system - make the classic mistake of confusing the two different
statements, did we??? ;-)

**Nope. A DIY'er is, by definition, after a bargain (or an education).
Further, it is safe to assume that his choice of speakers suggests that
he is on a tight budget. If I am wrong, I will be happy to retract my
assumption.



Absolute ******** - a very unsafe presumption at best...






- That's your usual (what's that
term - 'strawman'?) little injection into the proceedings isn't it??

**Nope.


Not nope - yep...

**I could have said: "Non-sequitur".



I could have said "Non est ad astra mollis e terris via
".....


**You could, but I wouldn't have a clue about what you are saying.


OK, I'm a) surprised you didn't Google it and come up with the answer and b)
even more surprised that the group's leading wattock didn't do so? (Or did
he?? ;-)

Seneca: The trip from the earth to the stars is not an easy one.









Or that
can subscribe here if they perform some sort of 'confession' or
make an obeisance to their (wiser) betters?

**Education never hurt anyone.


Agreed - try some.

**What would you suggest? Vaccuum tube theory? Nope. I can get by.


Start with 'Ubu Roi' by Alfred Jarry (1896) - it's an allegory of
Digital Theory predating the concept by nearly a hundred years. You
should find it interesting.....

**Why? I am not discussing digital. I am discussing signals in the
analogue domain.



That too...








Ever see a valvie give an ss type a hard
time because he doesn't like/use valves?

**Every single day.


Must be hell....

**It is distressing being surrounded by fools.


There there, never mind - if you don't look straight at them, they'll
all go away soon....


Again with the 'cheap, crappy valve amps' - you really don't have an
argument do you? Why not just say *broken* amps and be done with
it???

**Because many people imagine that because it has tubes, it must be
good.

???


It is very important to show that this is not necessarily the case.


It is?? To whom??

**To the poor fools who have been deluded by the marketers of shoddy
valve amps, masquerading as decent products.



You must have 'em on every street corner.....


**Pretty much.


(Paid the full ML 'Red Rose' price for a chinky amp, did they?)


**Worse. Some have actually paid real Dollars for Audio Note amps.



I got no problem with Audio Note stuff - make some pretty good trannies,
from what I gather....








A valve amp may be good, or it may be bad.


Stressy, isn't it...??? :-)

**Not at all. A quick set of measurements will soon sort out the good
and the bad.



Stoppit, please - most of us just chuck the ****ing music on and
listen to it. We ain't 'measuring' it or giving it marks out of ten!
We play it the best way we like to hear it - is that really too hard
to understand??

**Not at all.


Note to Jim Lesurf - if I don't see you pulling this clown up for not
snipping soon, I'll start to feel a bit 'singled out' - know wot I
mean?



He ain't snipping, I ain't snipping - we've done all this before.....






The trouble with you *extreme* CD/SS types is you really got nowhere
to go, have you?

**Now you're engaing in projection. I suggest you do some homework,
before attempting to tar me with a brush you tar others with.

It can't be vinyl, it can't be valves, it can't be MP3s, it can't
be 24/92 or 24/192, it can't be AM, it can't be DAB, it can't be 78s,
it can't be cassettes, it can't be mono etc. etc. etc..

**And I have never said anything of the kind. Except AM (though I did
build a superb, all valve, 4 stage TRF, with a triode infinite
impedance detector, when I was 16.).


I'll say it again: The trouble with you *extreme* CD/SS types is you
really got nowhere to go, have you?

**More projection. Do your homework, before shooting your mouth off.
Here's where you have to prove that I have ever defended 16/44 digital
as being the "ultimate" signal source.



I don't have to prove diddly dick.....


**When you accuse me of something, you need to provide some evidence.



Not sure that I have accused you of anything, but I don't have to provide
evidence for an accusation - you would have to prove I'm wrong, in my little
world! ;-)

For example, I say you are a pooftah....

OK? Over to you, prove you are (presumably?) not.... ;-)




For the record:



Records are not digital....


* I use MP3 in my car. It is entirely adequate, in that environment.
* I stopped using cassettes a couple of years ago. (I used to own a
Nakamichi 100ZXL)
* I listen to AM radio, every Saturday morning. It's a local show called
The Weekend Woodies.
http://www.abc.net.au/sydney/photogalleries/woodies/
* I have always felt that 16/44 digital is inadequate to compete with
the VERY BEST (sorry to shout) vinyl available.



First thing you've said that made any sense....


* I have always detested 78s.
* I like 15ips reel to reel.





**Means nothing to me. There are some crappy SS amps on the market.


Really?

**Yes, really.

That's news to me - can you name one current, freely available (in
the UK, of course) make and model??

**One of the most ordinary, I encounter reasonably frequently is the
Audiolab 8000A. It can deliver gobs of current, but sounds terrible.
As for current models, just pick up any sub-1,000 Squid surround sound
receiver. They all sound horrible. Any brand.


Ooh, that's going to ruffle the feathers of someone here.....

**I don't give a ****. It is a horrible sounding amplifier (yes, I've
compared it blind).



I've never heard one - all I've ever heard is that they are supposed to
be good???


**The Audiolab 8000A does SOME really good things:

* It is quite powerful and powerful sounding, in a compact package.
* It copes with difficult loads quite well.
* It delivers a good set of specifications.



Yet it "It is a horrible sounding amplifier" - Jeez, I needn't type a damn
thing, do I? - You are making all my points better than I can!!







Kills me the way you
'anti****s' try to fit this group up with your own wacky little
prejudices and then try to wipe it off on those of us who have
declared time and time again we don't give a rat's arse what you or
anyone else prefers or uses....

Still, if it makes you happy.....???

**Nothing makes me happy. I'm a grump.


Not as grumpy as me - I've got the sodding 'flu and haven't had a wink
of sleep all night......

**There are two Aussie inventions you should (have) tried. It is too
late now, as you need to use them at the first signs.
Tamiflu and Relenza. I find them to be remarkably effective (and
expensive).



We have Lemsip in the UK.....

(Says it all really.... :-)


**We have Lemsip here too. It's useless.


No it isn't. I'm going to have another one in a mo....


Tamiflu and Relenza are prescription drugs.



I don't have a doctor - I don't use 'prescription drugs'.....


They're useful. I've found Relenza shortens the duration
of a cold by about 2 days and reduces it's intensity somewhat. At
AUS$60.00, it ain't cheap, but those of us who are self-employed, it is
well worth it. No side effects.





(Might get mi second Chinky valve amp today tho' - that'll cheer me up!
:-)

**You deserve it.



Well, thank you - it turned up this afternoon.


If you must, you really should try to lay your hands on
a second hand ARC VT100. Superb amp.



Sounds a little out of my price range.....


**If you want quality..... A Classic 60 and 120 are both nice products
too.



Still out of my reach, I suspect....

You see, this is the whole point that gets missed by the idiots here who
bleat continuously about what they simply don't know - you really *can* get
a nice-sounding valve amp for well under a grand!! (Half that, if a kit or
half that again if Chinese!!)

Valves are *extremely* mature technology - all you need to do, to get a a
decent 'bang/buck' ratio is scrape away the bull**** 'audiophilia' and
xenophobic prejudice.....










Keith G November 11th 04 10:54 PM

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale Diamond II's
 

"Kurt Hamster" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:27:29 GMT, Trevor Wilson used

a lot of quoting to say very little...

Certainly it does - if music/voices on my kit didn't sound exactly like
I
expect it/them to, I'd get rid.


**So, you have no way to verify what you think it should sound like? How
do
you know that your source is accurate?


Does it actually matter in the scheme of things, so long as what comes
out at this end is enjoyable?




Ain't *hard* is it....???

:-)





I have news for you: If your amps do not meet or exceed the parameters
I
have outlined, they do, in fact, audibly distort.


Not that I can detect - why do you have a problem grasping this?


**You can't detect their distortions, because you've never measured them.



If he can't detect them with his ears then why would he want to measure
them?



He doesn't..... ;-)






Dave Plowman (News) November 11th 04 10:57 PM

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale Diamond II's
 
In article ,
Kurt Hamster wrote:
Here's a little trick which surprisingly works.


Turn your thermostat down 1 or 2 degrees and leave the heating on ALL
the time, not just in the morning and evening. I guarantee you will save
money and the house will be a warmer place 24/7.


No it won't. Heating loss increases as a product of the differential. So
leaving the heating on may well, of course, result in a more comfortable
house, but it won't save money.

The most sensible way is to use a programmable thermostat. This will
automatically adjust the temperature for night time, morning, day when
you're out or busy, and evening when relaxing. And may also be set for
different combinations on non working days.

About 50 quid and easy to fit. Battery operated. Remote wireless types
also available.

--
*A fool and his money are soon partying *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

mick November 11th 04 11:14 PM

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale Diamond II's
 
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:36:58 +0000, Trevor Wilson wrote:

snip

THD is meanongless in the real world. It is a great method of producing
comparisons between amps, but there are so many other factors to be
taken into consideration that, below something like 5%, it is completely
inaudible.


**Bull****. Way back when I was a trainee tech, some of us experimented
with some pretty crappy speakers and discovered than 1% THD was audible.
Other experimenters have suggested that around 0.1% is a reasonable
threshold for average listeners. Critical listeners may be able to detect
far less.


You can produce two signals with identical THD%. One will have very
audible distortion and the other won't. It depends on the relative
strengths of the harmonics. This is reproducible under test conditions by
adding harmonics to a pure tone. The signal with the higher level of low,
even harmonics will sound purer. In the light of this, how can you state
that comparison of THD is meaningful *in listening tests*? For amp
designing and comparison measurements, yes, but not for listening. Your
listener will quickly pick up on, say, third harmonic if the second
harmonic is at a low level but as the second harmonic level increases it
masks the third harmonic problem. The THD goes up but the sound appears
"purer" to the listener. Obviously, I am talking about test tones here,
not real music, but that tends to introduce other masking effects anyway,
as the relative values of the harmonics are detected differently at
different frequencies. By all means design for low THD as this affects
the entire system, but a high THD does not necessarily mean that the amp
sounds bad or that the effect of the high THD is audible.

snip
My first trf used battery valves &
ran from suitable 90v and 1.5v batteries!


**I'll betcha you didn't use an infinite impedance detector. Yours used
a standard diode one, right?


Hell - I don't remember much about it now! It must have been over 40 years
ago! It was a regenerative detector (with a "reaction" control) just to
keep things simple for a first set. All I can remember for certain is that
it had a 1T4 valve in it. I seem to remember adding another one or two
valves later, but one of them was a DL91 to drive a speaker. The other was
probably an RF stage to isolate the oscillator from the aerial! Oh yeah -
it had a Denco coil on a paxolin former. Why did I remember that? I can
even picture the coil now!

--
Mick
(no M$ software on here... :-) )
Web: http://www.nascom.info



Dave Plowman (News) November 11th 04 11:45 PM

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale Diamond II's
 
In article ,
Kurt Hamster wrote:
No it won't. Heating loss increases as a product of the differential. So
leaving the heating on may well, of course, result in a more comfortable
house, but it won't save money.


I've been doing it for several months and my gas consumption has
decreased by approx 3% in my house and about 5% in my partner's house.


Then this is purely down to reducing the maximum temperature - not leaving
it on 24 hours.

Did you think I was guessing?


Since you do about near everything else, why not this?

FWIW, this isn't a matter of my opinion. Do some research if my word isn't
good enough. Which I'll expect you'll agree with.

--
*Reality is a crutch for people who can't handle drugs.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Arny Krueger November 12th 04 12:46 AM

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale Diamond II's
 
"Ian Molton" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:

I guess its possible its bigger than some of the smaller components
in a classical watch. (thats a guess though).


Not at all.


How big are the features on a typical mask used in photolithography
then?


At one time they were quite large. In some processes there is no mask - the
pattern is written directly on the wafer.

the chip is produced by shrinking the mask optically onto the
silicon wafer...



Yes, which means that the detail is very fine - tolerances on the
order of wavelengths of light and even X-rays.


Indeed - but is the mask that fine or is the image focued through a
much bigger mask?


If a mask is used, its far larger than the finished product.




Tat Chan November 12th 04 01:03 AM

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale DiamondII's
 
John Phillips wrote:

In article , Tat Chan wrote:

Heck, if I want an accurate timepiece, I would just use my mobile phone!




Amplifiers which have not taken advantage of the most accurate technical
developments in electronics remain perfectly valid for many of the
same reasons as mechanical timekeepers, jewellery and other matters of
individuality and preference.


Agreed.



I note many people in the audio press and elsewhere creating incredible
untested technical arguments for "why" valve amplifiers etc. Unless you
are in such a minority business and have to create or maintain a market
for your product, seeking engineering reasons to justify "why" someone
wants to try out a valve amplifier is both unnecessary and inappropriate.


Do they actually try to create engineering reasons? I always thought the
usual mantra was "it sounds better because no one has designed the right
measurement test to capture the betterness" or "science doesn't tell us
everything yet"


Ultimately, however, it should be appreciated that the audio press and
this news group are not scientific journals.


True.



Tat Chan November 12th 04 01:05 AM

Valve amp (preferably DIY) to drive apair of Wharfedale DiamondII's
 
Nick Gorham wrote:

Tat Chan wrote:


To make a fine distinction, some people go for what they
*perceive* as being more accurate.




sure, but sometimes perception doesn't reflect what is actually going on.


I am sure you will have studied physics, name me one case where
perception does reflect exactly what is actually going on ?



Like a wheel looking like it is spinning backwards once the frequency of
rotation goes past a certain threshold?


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk