|
|
Advice needed on new Hi-Fi system
|
Advice needed on new Hi-Fi system
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:54:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:42:23 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:37:34 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:46:10 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: And I can put up a SET amp and a Denon which I'd bet will *not* sound differently at normal listening levels................ Right, but Weil apparently doesn't know that. The ole ABX site didn't seem to think so... The old ABX site tested exactly zero SETs. You lose Weil. Again. Try checking your facts next time... OK, 10 watt tube amp then. whatever *that* was. Push pull, power tetrodes with loop feedback. Prove it. Please see http://www.mods.com/heath-hifi/schema.html . I really don't know which Heath amp it was, but the reference shows that *all* or virtually all Heath tubed HiFi amps of the day had those features. Prove that it was a Heath amp. You can't because you don't even know what model it was. Prove that it wasn't an SET. As far as I know from the site, it *could* be an SET, so I only "partially" lose. You could have asked for more relevant facts if you had the brains and decency to do so, Weil. |
Advice needed on new Hi-Fi system
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:54:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:42:23 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:37:34 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:46:10 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: And I can put up a SET amp and a Denon which I'd bet will *not* sound differently at normal listening levels................ Right, but Weil apparently doesn't know that. The ole ABX site didn't seem to think so... The old ABX site tested exactly zero SETs. You lose Weil. Again. Try checking your facts next time... OK, 10 watt tube amp then. whatever *that* was. Push pull, power tetrodes with loop feedback. Prove it. Please see http://www.mods.com/heath-hifi/schema.html . I really don't know which Heath amp it was, but the reference shows that *all* or virtually all Heath tubed HiFi amps of the day had those features. Prove that it was a Heath amp. You can't because you don't even know what model it was. Prove that it wasn't an SET. As far as I know from the site, it *could* be an SET, so I only "partially" lose. You could have asked for more relevant facts if you had the brains and decency to do so, Weil. |
Advice needed on new Hi-Fi system
Stewart Pinkerton said: Well you ought to stay off RAO from making a fraudulent, deceptive offer 'cause I will personally kick your ass every time you do, every time. Judging by your posts so far Did you figure it out yet, Pukey? Do you remember who you're chatting with now? |
Advice needed on new Hi-Fi system
Stewart Pinkerton said: Well you ought to stay off RAO from making a fraudulent, deceptive offer 'cause I will personally kick your ass every time you do, every time. Judging by your posts so far Did you figure it out yet, Pukey? Do you remember who you're chatting with now? |
Advice needed on new Hi-Fi system
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
JBorg wrote: Stewart Pinkerton wrote JBorg wrote: Stewrat Pinkerton wrote: " If you really believe in 'cable sound', I have a standing offer of £1,000 to *anyone* who can tell apart any two cables under double-blind conditions, the only proviso being that they measure +/- 0.1dB from 20-20kHz at the speaker terminals. This is trivially easy for all but the most pathological cables. " Are you still sure about this offer at RAO ? I don't read r.a.o, but the offer stands. Well you ought to stay off RAO from making a fraudulent, deceptive offer 'cause I will personally kick your a** every time you do, every time. Judging by your posts so far, you couldn't find your own ass with both hands, never mind kick anyone else's. The offer is genuine, has been on the table for years, and none of you gutless wonders has even *tried* to collect it. The offer is genuine? All you're good at is yak like Ferstler. You'll "snip" your trouser and bury your head in your ass under artillery fire. Your a bad joke. NOW for some gut-busting scream: I SAID: Keep your stupidity at Uk.rec.audio if that's what they want. STEWART "I'm a qualified physicist and an engineer" PINKERTON replied: I do. Some other clown cross-posted this thread to r.a.o. BWAHahahahah!!! There it is fine gentlemen of English blood!! and other parts of the Kingdom !! LOL LOL LOL He said it, he said it, hahahah I do I do I do !!! He is now determine to give you all his willies ! Because it is what you want! Hahahaha! LOL again!!, and bouncing my a** on the floor this time!! and rolling... Goofball will be proud of him. Clearly, you prefer that brain-dead environment. No we just detest scammers hahaha lol! We like to spin 'em around, toss 'em in the air, and, well, send them to other newsgroup. Hahahah You are an English embarrassment, and a coward to boot.. I'm Scottish, and I'm the one putting his cash where his mouth is, unlike you.......... ....... unlike you, you're a lying scam artist who uses money as a bait to delude gullible audiophiles just so to satiate your cantankerous, revolting selfish ego. Hahahahah... -- You're dismissed. |
Advice needed on new Hi-Fi system
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
JBorg wrote: Stewart Pinkerton wrote JBorg wrote: Stewrat Pinkerton wrote: " If you really believe in 'cable sound', I have a standing offer of £1,000 to *anyone* who can tell apart any two cables under double-blind conditions, the only proviso being that they measure +/- 0.1dB from 20-20kHz at the speaker terminals. This is trivially easy for all but the most pathological cables. " Are you still sure about this offer at RAO ? I don't read r.a.o, but the offer stands. Well you ought to stay off RAO from making a fraudulent, deceptive offer 'cause I will personally kick your a** every time you do, every time. Judging by your posts so far, you couldn't find your own ass with both hands, never mind kick anyone else's. The offer is genuine, has been on the table for years, and none of you gutless wonders has even *tried* to collect it. The offer is genuine? All you're good at is yak like Ferstler. You'll "snip" your trouser and bury your head in your ass under artillery fire. Your a bad joke. NOW for some gut-busting scream: I SAID: Keep your stupidity at Uk.rec.audio if that's what they want. STEWART "I'm a qualified physicist and an engineer" PINKERTON replied: I do. Some other clown cross-posted this thread to r.a.o. BWAHahahahah!!! There it is fine gentlemen of English blood!! and other parts of the Kingdom !! LOL LOL LOL He said it, he said it, hahahah I do I do I do !!! He is now determine to give you all his willies ! Because it is what you want! Hahahaha! LOL again!!, and bouncing my a** on the floor this time!! and rolling... Goofball will be proud of him. Clearly, you prefer that brain-dead environment. No we just detest scammers hahaha lol! We like to spin 'em around, toss 'em in the air, and, well, send them to other newsgroup. Hahahah You are an English embarrassment, and a coward to boot.. I'm Scottish, and I'm the one putting his cash where his mouth is, unlike you.......... ....... unlike you, you're a lying scam artist who uses money as a bait to delude gullible audiophiles just so to satiate your cantankerous, revolting selfish ego. Hahahahah... -- You're dismissed. |
Advice needed on new Hi-Fi system
"dave weil" wrote in message ... On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:54:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:42:23 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:37:34 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:46:10 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: And I can put up a SET amp and a Denon which I'd bet will *not* sound differently at normal listening levels................ Right, but Weil apparently doesn't know that. The ole ABX site didn't seem to think so... The old ABX site tested exactly zero SETs. You lose Weil. Again. Try checking your facts next time... OK, 10 watt tube amp then. whatever *that* was. Push pull, power tetrodes with loop feedback. Prove it. Please see http://www.mods.com/heath-hifi/schema.html . I really don't know which Heath amp it was, but the reference shows that *all* or virtually all Heath tubed HiFi amps of the day had those features. Prove that it was a Heath amp. http://www.google.com/groups?selm=6f...ibur.flash.net "SMWTMS listening tests at Jeff's Vajgart's apartment in May, 1977 compared several "good" and "bad" amplifiers. My Dyna 400, and a Paoli 60 owned by David West, represented the former. Two home brew amplifiers - the Muller/Heath 10/7 watt (tube) and David Clark's "Schwartz 40" represented the latter. Jeff had Spendor Loudspeakers, which were known to be accurate reproducers." You can't because you don't even know what model it was. I don't have to know what model it was. Ironically, SETs were virtually unknown as hifi amplifiers at the time. Of course you weren't even aware of these issues at the time, Weil. One of these days you'll have to learn that there was a world before your litter was ejected from its mother. Prove that it wasn't an SET. I did, but you're in denial again, Weil. As far as I know from the site, it *could* be an SET, so I only "partially" lose. You could have asked for more relevant facts if you had the brains and decency to do so, Weil. Weil bites the dust, again. Yawn! |
Advice needed on new Hi-Fi system
"dave weil" wrote in message ... On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:54:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:42:23 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:37:34 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:46:10 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: And I can put up a SET amp and a Denon which I'd bet will *not* sound differently at normal listening levels................ Right, but Weil apparently doesn't know that. The ole ABX site didn't seem to think so... The old ABX site tested exactly zero SETs. You lose Weil. Again. Try checking your facts next time... OK, 10 watt tube amp then. whatever *that* was. Push pull, power tetrodes with loop feedback. Prove it. Please see http://www.mods.com/heath-hifi/schema.html . I really don't know which Heath amp it was, but the reference shows that *all* or virtually all Heath tubed HiFi amps of the day had those features. Prove that it was a Heath amp. http://www.google.com/groups?selm=6f...ibur.flash.net "SMWTMS listening tests at Jeff's Vajgart's apartment in May, 1977 compared several "good" and "bad" amplifiers. My Dyna 400, and a Paoli 60 owned by David West, represented the former. Two home brew amplifiers - the Muller/Heath 10/7 watt (tube) and David Clark's "Schwartz 40" represented the latter. Jeff had Spendor Loudspeakers, which were known to be accurate reproducers." You can't because you don't even know what model it was. I don't have to know what model it was. Ironically, SETs were virtually unknown as hifi amplifiers at the time. Of course you weren't even aware of these issues at the time, Weil. One of these days you'll have to learn that there was a world before your litter was ejected from its mother. Prove that it wasn't an SET. I did, but you're in denial again, Weil. As far as I know from the site, it *could* be an SET, so I only "partially" lose. You could have asked for more relevant facts if you had the brains and decency to do so, Weil. Weil bites the dust, again. Yawn! |
Advice needed on new Hi-Fi system
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 06:47:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "SMWTMS listening tests at Jeff's Vajgart's apartment in May, 1977 compared several "good" and "bad" amplifiers. My Dyna 400, and a Paoli 60 owned by David West, represented the former. Two home brew amplifiers - the Muller/Heath 10/7 watt (tube) and David Clark's "Schwartz 40" represented the latter. Jeff had Spendor Loudspeakers, which were known to be accurate reproducers." This isn't proof. It's just a statement that you made. BTW, even if it were true, why were you using obviously poorly built home-brew amplifiers in a serious test? guffaw! |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk