In article i,
Iain Churches wrote:

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
I have access to groups you don't have Iain, so what's your point?

Your TV sound forum would bore me to tears:-((

So you'd be bored to tears by something concerning my work, but think I
should be interested in yours?

If you do not appreciate or know anything about music, then it
might not be too interesting for you, but you would probably be
more than happy to exchange pay.slips:.-)))

Another of those bitchy comments you say you hate so much in others.
Including boasting on how much you earn. How very juvenile.

Given the little spat you've had with our foul mouthed Oz cousin, you
seem to be rather concerned with some ancient glass enclosed
technology. So just as well you stick to discussing it with your
anorak pals.

Oh you mean Phil? If you read between the asterisks in his posts, you
will find that, despite is lack of social skills, he is actually a
pretty clever bloke, and, as Patrick Turner points out, is rarely
wrong. He insults everyone, including the leading lights here, Jim and
Don. If you haven't been insulted by Phil, that means you haven't
posted anything of interest.

More acid. Obviously being oh so polite on all those private groups you
inhabit has taken its toll.

Cordially

Anything but.

--
*Never miss a good chance to shut up.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
For one who claims to hate the mud slinging of news groups you seem to
do a remarkable amount of it yourself.

I have asked Arny several times what this "truth about Kruborg" thing is
all about. He seems reluctant to say. As his pal, Dave, you probably
know.

You obviously have a different definition of pal to me.

However, if I really wanted to know, I'd guess some Googling would soon
turn something up. But then that wasn't the purpose of your 'question' was
it?

--
*Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
i.fi
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message ...
In article
,
Iain Churches wrote:
At least Pinkie was fluent in his native tongue, Arny.
You must go down in history as the most dyslectic,
foul-mouthed "Christian" of all time:-) I am sure your
pastor is proud of you. I try to refrain from replying
to your posts, as they usually result in a number of
messages to my personal mailbox from people wanting to
tell me the "truth about Kruborg" There is no subject
in which I am less interested.

For one who claims to hate the mud slinging of news
groups you seem to do a remarkable amount of it yourself.

I have asked Arny several times what this "truth about
Kruborg" thing is all about.

Speaking of being spelling-challenged Iain, the correct spelling is
"Krooborg". The word traces back to the Middiot, the one that holds court
over on RAO. I suggest you speak to him yourself Iain. As he's an idiot you
can speak to him in his native tongue, which is idiotese. I'm not as fluent
in that peculiar dialect as you are, Iain.

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
i.fi
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"Iain Churches" wrote in message
news
I correspond regularly with an ex BBC chap who has had
a number of papers published in the JAES and has written
articles in both Studio Sound and the hi-fi press. He
told me that he would prefer cranial surgery to
discussion with Pinkie's Boys (whom I took to be
Stewart, yourself and Arny)

Iain, I'll see your AES member with a couple of JAES
papers, and raise you with three AES felllows, all of
whom have had a number of papers published in the JAES.

A couple of weeks ago, I gave a paper about microphones,
recording and SR at my hi-fi club's most recent meeting.
Two AES Fellows (Clark and Lip****z) were present. To
bad my other good friend who is an AES Fellow, Earl
Geddes decided not to show. A good time was had by all.
BTW, Geddes, Clark and Lip****z have all had "a number
of papers" published in the JAES.

I hope you did not play them any of your recordings Arny,
I can imagine the scramble for the Exit :-))

"To bad" ??? Come on, Arnold, get a grip. This is an
English language NG.

Yup, you can judge people by their reactions to trivial typos.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"Iain Churches" wrote in message
news
I correspond regularly with an ex BBC chap who has had
a number of papers published in the JAES and has written
articles in both Studio Sound and the hi-fi press. He
told me that he would prefer cranial surgery to discussion
with Pinkie's Boys (whom I took to be Stewart, yourself
and Arny)

Iain, I'll see your AES member with a couple of JAES papers, and raise
you with three AES felllows, all of whom have had a number of papers
published in the JAES.

A couple of weeks ago, I gave a paper about microphones, recording and
SR at my hi-fi club's most recent meeting. Two AES Fellows (Clark and
Lip****z) were present. To bad my other good friend who is an AES
Fellow, Earl Geddes decided not to show. A good time was had by all.
BTW, Geddes, Clark and Lip****z have all had "a number of papers"
published in the JAES.


If only I could get this on Swim's roses....

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article i,
Iain Churches wrote:

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
I have access to groups you don't have Iain, so what's your
point?

Your TV sound forum would bore me to tears:-((

So you'd be bored to tears by something concerning my work, but
think I
should be interested in yours?

If you do not appreciate or know anything about music, then it
might not be too interesting for you, but you would probably be
more than happy to exchange pay.slips:.-)))

Another of those bitchy comments you say you hate so much in others.
Including boasting on how much you earn. How very juvenile.

Given the little spat you've had with our foul mouthed Oz cousin,
you
seem to be rather concerned with some ancient glass enclosed
technology. So just as well you stick to discussing it with your
anorak pals.

Oh you mean Phil? If you read between the asterisks in his posts,
you
will find that, despite is lack of social skills, he is actually a
pretty clever bloke, and, as Patrick Turner points out, is rarely
wrong. He insults everyone, including the leading lights here, Jim
and
Don. If you haven't been insulted by Phil, that means you haven't
posted anything of interest.

More acid. Obviously being oh so polite on all those private groups
you
inhabit has taken its toll.

Cordially

Anything but.


Heh heh! :-)

The *hypocrisy* squirts out of Plowie like when you kneel on your tube
of Solvol chrome cleaner, whilst you're cleaning your 'bike....





--
*Never miss a good chance to shut up.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Iain Churches" wrote in message
i.fi
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"Iain Churches" wrote in message
news
I correspond regularly with an ex BBC chap who has had
a number of papers published in the JAES and has written
articles in both Studio Sound and the hi-fi press. He
told me that he would prefer cranial surgery to
discussion with Pinkie's Boys (whom I took to be
Stewart, yourself and Arny)

Iain, I'll see your AES member with a couple of JAES
papers, and raise you with three AES felllows, all of
whom have had a number of papers published in the JAES.

A couple of weeks ago, I gave a paper about microphones,
recording and SR at my hi-fi club's most recent meeting.
Two AES Fellows (Clark and Lip****z) were present. To
bad my other good friend who is an AES Fellow, Earl
Geddes decided not to show. A good time was had by all.
BTW, Geddes, Clark and Lip****z have all had "a number
of papers" published in the JAES.

I hope you did not play them any of your recordings Arny,
I can imagine the scramble for the Exit :-))

"To bad" ??? Come on, Arnold, get a grip. This is an
English language NG.

Yup, you can judge people by their reactions to trivial typos.



Ordinarily, I'd agree but while Iain's busy *ballooning pricks* I can
see his point.

And isn't he doing a great job? Seeing you and the other remaining
wrecker of this group (Plowie) squirming and squealing, like you both
are, is most amusing - especially when he seems to be able to do it so
easily!

:-)

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
Speaking of being spelling-challenged Iain, the correct spelling is
"Krooborg". The word traces back to the Middiot, the one that holds court
over on RAO. I suggest you speak to him yourself Iain. As he's an idiot
you can speak to him in his native tongue, which is idiotese. I'm not as
fluent in that peculiar dialect as you are, Iain.

And this from the man who writes "condensor microphone, db and MHZ"
LOL:-)))

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
Yup, you can judge people by their reactions to trivial typos.

Alternatively, you can form a fairly accurate impression of
a person from their inability to spell a word of one syllable
correctly.

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article i,
Iain Churches wrote:

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Iain Churches wrote:
I have access to groups you don't have Iain, so what's your point?

Your TV sound forum would bore me to tears:-((

So you'd be bored to tears by something concerning my work, but think I
should be interested in yours?

If you do not appreciate or know anything about music, then it
might not be too interesting for you, but you would probably be
more than happy to exchange pay.slips:.-)))

Another of those bitchy comments you say you hate so much in others.
Including boasting on how much you earn. How very juvenile.

As you well know. Dave, levels of pay in our industry are skill related.


Given the little spat you've had with our foul mouthed Oz cousin, you
seem to be rather concerned with some ancient glass enclosed
technology. So just as well you stick to discussing it with your
anorak pals.

Oh you mean Phil? If you read between the asterisks in his posts, you
will find that, despite is lack of social skills, he is actually a
pretty clever bloke, and, as Patrick Turner points out, is rarely
wrong. He insults everyone, including the leading lights here, Jim and
Don. If you haven't been insulted by Phil, that means you haven't
posted anything of interest.

More acid. Obviously being oh so polite on all those private groups you
inhabit has taken its toll.

Most broadcasting companies and many record companies are
corporations, so I wonder if your use of the word "private" is appropriate?

Nothing acid there. I have quite a soft spot for poor old Phil, even though
he does behave oddly. In his own particular area of expertise he is rarely
wrong.

Cheers
Iain