![]() |
What is an "engineer" (was Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?)
John Byrns wrote:
Incidentally, I thought train drivers drive trains, and engineers keep the engine running, mostly by shovelling coal. Hence with the coming of diesels, drivers remain whereas engineers, in that sense, are gone. In American parlance the guys who shoveled coal were called firemen, and they are indeed gone while the engineers remain on the diesels. America must be really complicated. What do you call people who put out fires? Trying to remember the Casey Jones theme tune. Or was it the Grateful Dead song. Somehow I knew that American engineers drive trains. A train that treks across a wilderness is rather more of a venture than one that snakes between towns, so I wouldn't be surprised at a different division of labour amongst the crew. Ian |
Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
I've worked in the audio/video business as an engineer for 25 years
now, primarily in systems integration. And yes, I attended some well recognized engineering schools. An engineering school can only prepare you with the basics and teach you approaches and processes. No one that's sat through differential equations, electromechanics, and physical chemistry will ever tell you that it's easy. Recognize you've focused on a very tiny slice of a traditional electrical engineering education- amplifier design. Analog circuit design may amount to less than 100 class hours during a four year degree. Amplifier design may amount to 15% of that course at most. You do the math. Clearly there have been amplifier successes and failure in every class listed. Can you honestly say a Quad 303 (Class B) was not a success, remaining in production for years? How many of the initial Class D amps were a total failure, yet some of the chip amps today are incredibly good values and sound great? Most Class A amplifiers are incredibly annoying in summertime and can't move woofers. The vast majority of amplifier are AB for a number of practical reasons, yet that hardly makes them superior in all aspects. I think you owe these folks an apology. |
What is an "engineer" (was Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?)
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:35:06 GMT, "Ian Iveson"
wrote: A train that treks across a wilderness is rather more of a venture than one that snakes between towns, so I wouldn't be surprised at a different division of labour amongst the crew. Technically easier to "set it and leave it" on a long run, I'd have thought. More skill needed on a complex urban route. |
Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
" wrote: I think you owe these folks an apology. Joot owes the entire WORLD an apology for his mere existence. Graham |
What is an "engineer" (was Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?)
Laurence Payne wrote:
A train that treks across a wilderness is rather more of a venture than one that snakes between towns, so I wouldn't be surprised at a different division of labour amongst the crew. Technically easier to "set it and leave it" on a long run, I'd have thought. More skill needed on a complex urban route. OTOH, if you break down in the middle of nowhere in America, or run into a bison or an elk, there's wildcats, bears, wolves, coyotes, rattlesnakes, injuns, Billy the Kid, and vultures. You need to be able to fix the train and get out of there fast. "Train driver" encourages the misconception, common I guess among children who want to be train drivers, that trains have steering wheels, and require great skill to keep them on the tracks. Oh, and ... http://www.trainweb.org/caseyjones/song.html "A story 'bout a brave engineer" "If I can have Sim Webb, my fireman, my engine 382" Ian |
What is an "engineer" (was Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?)
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:10:13 GMT, "Ian Iveson"
wrote: Technically easier to "set it and leave it" on a long run, I'd have thought. More skill needed on a complex urban route. OTOH, if you break down in the middle of nowhere in America, or run into a bison or an elk, there's wildcats, bears, wolves, coyotes, rattlesnakes, injuns, Billy the Kid, and vultures. You need to be able to fix the train and get out of there fast. I'd be more worried about the human coyotes who'd have the train stripped if you broke down on an urban run :-) |
What is an "engineer" (was Why are "engineers" so poorlyeducated?)
Ian Iveson wrote: "Train driver" encourages the misconception, common I guess among children who want to be train drivers, that trains have steering wheels, and require great skill to keep them on the tracks. What a load of absurd nonsense. But then, what else to expect fom you ? It certainly never confused me for sure. Graham |
Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
On Oct 27, 6:39 am, " wrote:
I've worked in the audio/video business as an engineer for 25 years now, primarily in systems integration. And yes, I attended some well recognized engineering schools. Congratulations. An engineering school can only prepare you with the basics and teach you approaches and processes. No one that's sat through differential equations, electromechanics, and physical chemistry will ever tell you that it's easy. Congratulations to all of them. Recognize you've focused on a very tiny slice of a traditional electrical engineering education- amplifier design. Analog circuit design may amount to less than 100 class hours during a four year degree. Amplifier design may amount to 15% of that course at most. You do the math. I don't have to. This isn't actually about competent engineers and their education, about whom I said nothing at all, but about your comprehension skills. Apparently you didn't notice that I put "engineers" in quotation marks because I was speaking of an egregious minority posturing on the internet as experts on amp design. If you had read the thread, you would have discovered that I named three self- styled engineers and accused them of lying on professional matters for personal reasons. The three are Graham "Poopie" Stevenson, Arny "Slapdash" Krueger and Don "Bluster" Pearce. If, as you say, their entire amplifier design education/experience between the three of them adds up to only 45 hours, why are they spouting off on the net, pretending to know more than those who have spent hundreds, perhaps thousands of hours, with amplifier design? Since you're so righteous, why didn't you long since kick their slack arses for their presumption? Clearly there have been amplifier successes and failure in every class listed. Can you honestly say a Quad 303 (Class B) was not a success, remaining in production for years? How many of the initial Class D amps were a total failure, yet some of the chip amps today are incredibly good values and sound great? Most Class A amplifiers are incredibly annoying in summertime and can't move woofers. The vast majority of amplifier are AB for a number of practical reasons, yet that hardly makes them superior in all aspects. Sure, but so what? Quad wasn't designed by a braggartly incompetent like Poopie Stevenson, or a liar like Slapdash Krueger, or a dullard like Bluster Pearce. (I'm big on Quad, having two kinds of electrostats and quite a few Quad amps both solid state and tube.) I think you owe these folks an apology. Why? You haven't made a case for anything except that engineers (all of them in your version) suffer a lack of education in amplifier design, the metasubject of this thread. My accusation was much, much more limited and specific and, what is more, I proved my case by making the main transgressor, Poopie Stevenson, recant his lie several times right out in public. I stand by it. Seems to me you're the one owing an apology to all these perfectly sound engineers you have now included, absolutely against my intention as the starter and owner of this thread, in " Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?" I absolutely repudiate your calumnies against the good engineers, " . Andre Jute If you think I'm tough on engineers, you should hear what I say about psychiatrists and economists... Visit Jute on Amps at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/ "wonderfully well written and reasoned information for the tube audio constructor" John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare "an unbelievably comprehensive web site containing vital gems of wisdom" Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review |
Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
On Oct 27, 7:42 am, Eeyore
wrote: " wrote: I think you owe these folks an apology. Joot owes the entire WORLD an apology for his mere existence. Graham Stop whining, Poopie. You held yourself up as an expert, Slapdash Krueger and Bluster Pearce joined you in your lie, you were caught out in a professional lie, you got your butt kicked for it, you recanted (several times), so why drag out your humiliation any further. Let it die, sonny. Andre Jute "Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving us wordly evidence of the fact."-- George Elliot |
Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
Andre Jute wrote: Eeyore wrote: " wrote: I think you owe these folks an apology. Joot owes the entire WORLD an apology for his mere existence. Graham Stop whining, Poopie. You held yourself up as an expert, Slapdash Krueger and Bluster Pearce joined you in your lie, you were caught out in a professional lie, you got your butt kicked for it No I didn't. Now stop telling lies. Graham |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk