WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:12:02 GMT, wrote:

How would you know that an amp NOT YET BUILT would sound "****ty"?

Because it was an SET.

Can you give us the names of the last 10 SETs that you've listened to?

I could, but then I'd have to kill you.
Besides, one POS amp is enough, or are you telling me that there are SET
amps that can play at normal levels without massive distortion?

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On 2 Mar 2006 15:50:23 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT). Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project. Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time.

Psychotic rants ignored out of pity, but one point noted: Every one of
my posts on this subject was matched by a significantly longer one
from Jute, and he is the one who keeps creating pure attack threads,
as he did right from my very first post on KISS. Interested readers
can draw the obvious conclusions regarding psychotic fixations.

Given that I know how much time I spend at my keyboard (about an hour
a day *total*), I also doubt the 4607 figure. God knows how much time
he's going to devote to this current series of psychotic attacks.
--

When I did a Google search for the words Andre, Jute, McCoy, with you as the
author, I only got 2000 total. Of course that could mean that many of them
simply had mention of his name and were not neccessarily posts that warned
people about how incompetent he is. They could have simply been warnings of
his Muchausen disease and why people should not take him too seriously.
Either way it simply more evidence that he counts about as well as designs
amps. :-)

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 

"Sander deWaal" wrote in message
...
" said:


But against your contention is, and to take your example of the 78s,
what if that same advocate were to state that "ONLY" 78s were fit to
represent music, and all non-believers in 78s were apostates or worse.
And then further, state that only his interpretation of the sound of
78s had any validity.


Mr. Jute never said that SET amps are the only way to go, he himself
prefers a PP EL34 in triode amplifier, if I'm correctly informed.


Were that same person to do as you say, and state "I prefer 78s to all
other media because..... " and then state "But I am writing for myself
and would not presume to dictate to anyone else." I don't think that
anyone here (well, maybe excepting Bret) would have raised a peep.


If one adds the line "In my opinion", or "just speaking for myself" ,
one is almost certain to be attacked for saying that by Arny Krueger.


Oh well, damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Actually, that's the best way to keep Arny from bothering with you at all.
It's when people say things like SET's are great sounding amps. Or CD
players have gigantic differences in sound quality, that will get his
attention.

I think that you know as well as anybody, that Stewart, while not exactly
shy about expressing his opinions, (as if that were strange around here) is
in fact a well qualified EE.

Mr. McCoy is probably as medicore writer, but has been taken apart by other
qualified people on every group he posts on, simply because he, like Brett
Ludwig, makes sweeping statements that are frequently wrong, and needs
another chair just for his ego.

The diffference is that Ludwig actually seems to do stuff and McCoy just
says he does.

Let the fools in this world argue and bitch each other to death, I'll
continue to listen to my music on various amps, both tube and MOSFET.
And, even better, I'll continue to build them myself.


At least we're reasonably sure that you can. With Mr. McCoy, not so much.

Bug Eater vs. humanity
 

Mickey McMickey said:

It's when people say things like SET's are great sounding amps.
Or CD players have gigantic differences in sound quality, that
will get [the Krooborg's] attention.

The sad thing, Mickey, is that you're entirely serious. You really and truly
believe that for somebody to like the sound of certain amps (the ones you
hate), or to prefer one CD player over another, is "wrong".

If Noah were loading up his ark today, he'd look at you and Arnii and say,
"No, boys, you can stay here and drown. We don't need any walking, talking
turds."

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
From: Patrick Turner
Date: Fri, Mar 3 2006 6:31 am
Email: Patrick Turner

By the way McCoy I just won $5000.00 betting that you would launch yet
another tirade against Stewart.

But you made yourself look like a complete loser.

Feel welcome to collect the 5 grand.

Exactly what contributions to tube craft are you going to make?

I call this individual 'nob' because he appears to be as stupid as a
doorknob.

He is a well-known preference basher and sycophant on r.a.o. My
prediction is that his 'contribution' to tubecraft will be to advise
any and all who will listen to him to conduct double-blind tests on
their audio components. He has, by all accounts, never performed one
himself, but that will not stop him from proselytizing.

If your preferences do not match his, you probably have hearing issues.

Best to ignore nob, lest his idiocy spill over to your group.

Thanks, Shhhh! Unfortunately Mickey McMickey, or Nob as you call him,
is depressingly familiar to us. I call him Nyobe, Queen of Ignorance
and Disease, and Patrick refers to him a MeKelpie, a Kelpie being a
particularly fine breed of New Zealand sheep dog, to account for
McKelvy's supine sycophancy. (It's an insult to Kelpies, which are
intelligent dogs, to compare Nob to them.)

It should not surprise anyone that Mike KcKelvy is an arselicker for
Krueger and Pinkerton. For a living he sells "consumer units, hi-fi" to
unsuspecting passers-by in a mall. If everyone wanted real hi-fi,
MeKelpie would be out of a job.

Doesn't excuse his stupidity, I know, but I just thought I'd get the
extenuating circumstances on the record, make myself look like a
tolerant, Christian, liberal sorta guy, even about a subhuman throwback
like Nob.

Andre Jute

PS I noticed Patrick writing to MeKelpie, but what has MeKelpie done to
deserve that honor? Basically the guy's a waste of skin and oxygen; he
doesn't deserve to have Patrick helping him with whatever his problem
is. I'm surprised Patrick even reads MeKelpie's sub-moronic witterings.

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OFMALICE
 

In article , "Andre
Jute" wrote:
4607 posts from Pinkerton, 938 posts from Jute over the same period.

Unfair. This doesn't count the 4000+ McCoy/Jute sockpuppets that posted
during this same period. McCoy/Jute is an evil, nasty, nasty man.

And I was presenting a major project over this period, while Pinkerton
was merely hounding the project, me and a whole tube newsgroup, simply
to satisfy his own malice.

"Presenting a Major Project" is McCoy/Jute-speak for dealing with his
chronic constipation.

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
ups.com...

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
From: Patrick Turner
Date: Fri, Mar 3 2006 6:31 am
Email: Patrick Turner

By the way McCoy I just won $5000.00 betting that you would launch yet
another tirade against Stewart.

But you made yourself look like a complete loser.

Feel welcome to collect the 5 grand.

Exactly what contributions to tube craft are you going to make?

I call this individual 'nob' because he appears to be as stupid as a
doorknob.

He is a well-known preference basher and sycophant on r.a.o. My
prediction is that his 'contribution' to tubecraft will be to advise
any and all who will listen to him to conduct double-blind tests on
their audio components. He has, by all accounts, never performed one
himself, but that will not stop him from proselytizing.

If your preferences do not match his, you probably have hearing issues.

Best to ignore nob, lest his idiocy spill over to your group.

Thanks, Shhhh! Unfortunately Mickey McMickey, or Nob as you call him,
is depressingly familiar to us. I call him Nyobe, Queen of Ignorance
and Disease, and Patrick refers to him a MeKelpie, a Kelpie being a
particularly fine breed of New Zealand sheep dog, to account for
McKelvy's supine sycophancy. (It's an insult to Kelpies, which are
intelligent dogs, to compare Nob to them.)

It should not surprise anyone that Mike KcKelvy is an arselicker for
Krueger and Pinkerton. For a living he sells "consumer units, hi-fi" to
unsuspecting passers-by in a mall. If everyone wanted real hi-fi,
MeKelpie would be out of a job.

Doesn't excuse his stupidity, I know, but I just thought I'd get the
extenuating circumstances on the record, make myself look like a
tolerant, Christian, liberal sorta guy, even about a subhuman throwback
like Nob.

Andre Jute

PS I noticed Patrick writing to MeKelpie, but what has MeKelpie done to
deserve that honor? Basically the guy's a waste of skin and oxygen; he
doesn't deserve to have Patrick helping him with whatever his problem
is. I'm surprised Patrick even reads MeKelpie's sub-moronic witterings.

You are nothing if not consistent. In this case consistently wrong, but
that's what we expect from you.

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 

From:
Date: Fri, Mar 3 2006 10:17 pm
Email:

You are nothing if not consistent. In this case consistently wrong, but
that's what we expect from you.

Who's the 'we'?

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...
From: Patrick Turner
Date: Fri, Mar 3 2006 6:31 am
Email: Patrick Turner

By the way McCoy I just won $5000.00 betting that you would launch yet
another tirade against Stewart.

But you made yourself look like a complete loser.

Feel welcome to collect the 5 grand.

Exactly what contributions to tube craft are you going to make?

None, same as McCoy.

I call this individual 'nob' because he appears to be as stupid as a
doorknob.

Why then I'm now smart enough to be a democrat.

He is a well-known preference basher and sycophant on r.a.o.

Untrue. I don't care about your prefernce. Apparently neither do you.

My
prediction is that his 'contribution' to tubecraft will be to advise
any and all who will listen to him to conduct double-blind tests on
their audio components. He has, by all accounts, never performed one
himself, but that will not stop him from proselytizing.

There are no contributiosns to be made to tube craft, it's obsolete
technology

If your preferences do not match his, you probably have hearing issues.

Best to ignore nob, lest his idiocy spill over to your group.

The only spilling is from McCoy by posting his crap here instead of keeping
it on RAT.

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OFMALICE
 

In article , "Robert Morein"
wrote:

In article , "Andre
Jute" wrote:
4607 posts from Pinkerton, 938 posts from Jute over the same period.

Unfair. This doesn't count the 4000+ McCoy/Jute sockpuppets that posted
during this same period. McCoy/Jute is an evil, nasty, nasty man.

And I was presenting a major project over this period, while Pinkerton
was merely hounding the project, me and a whole tube newsgroup, simply
to satisfy his own malice.

"Presenting a Major Project" is McCoy/Jute-speak for dealing with his
chronic constipation.
Forgery. But still damn funny.