Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/3755-why-stewart-pinkerton-unreliable-2-a.html)

Nick Gorham March 4th 06 08:58 AM

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:12:02 GMT, wrote:


How would you know that an amp NOT YET BUILT would sound "****ty"?

Because it was an SET.


Can you give us the names of the last 10 SETs that you've listened to?



I could, but then I'd have to kill you.
Besides, one POS amp is enough, or are you telling me that there are SET
amps that can play at normal levels without massive distortion?


Depends on what you mean by normal levens and massive distortion. Cant
tell you exactly what distortion mine produces at the moment (watch this
space)

I do know that at 10w output the distortion (nulled with a small notch
filter so far from perfect) does seem to be mainly 2nd harmonic


http://www.lurcher.org/nick/images/secondh.JPG

--
Nick

Stewart Pinkerton March 4th 06 10:30 AM

WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY IS A LIAR
 
On 3 Mar 2006 13:11:28 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:


Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On 2 Mar 2006 15:50:23 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT). Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project. Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time.


Psychotic rants ignored out of pity, but one point noted: Every one of
my posts on this subject was matched by a significantly longer one
from Jute, and he is the one who keeps creating pure attack threads,
as he did right from my very first post on KISS. Interested readers
can draw the obvious conclusions regarding psychotic fixations.


4607 posts from Pinkerton, 938 posts from Jute over the same period.
And I was presenting a major project over this period, while Pinkerton
was merely hounding the project, me and a whole tube newsgroup, simply
to satisfy his own malice. Count for yourself by scrolling to the
bottom of these pages:
Jute's posts, 938:
http://groups.google.ie/groups/profi...V7mdW13Q&hl=en
Pinkerton's posts 4607:
http://groups.google.ie/groups/profi...26WkCssg&hl=en

Given that I know how much time I spend at my keyboard (about an hour
a day *total*), I also doubt the 4607 figure. God knows how much time
he's going to devote to this current series of psychotic attacks.


As ever, Jute's incompetence and psychosis is revealed. Click on the
above links, use advanced search on author, restrict groups to
rec.audio.tubes and dates from 1 October 2004 to current date, and you
get the following results:

Andre Jute - 662

Stewart Pinkerton - 602

So not only is Jute *grossly* lying about the number of posts I made,
he fails to note that he himself made significantly more - also his
tend to be *much* more verbose than mine - and that's without counting
his faithful band of sockpuppets.

The statistics of malice, indeed............
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

George M. Middius March 4th 06 11:52 AM

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 


Shhhh! said to the Bug Eater:

You are nothing if not consistent. In this case consistently wrong, but
that's what we expect from you.


Who's the 'we'?


Mickey has Sillybot's full and groveling approval.





Patrick Turner March 4th 06 02:15 PM

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 


Andre Jute wrote:

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
From: Patrick Turner
Date: Fri, Mar 3 2006 6:31 am
Email: Patrick Turner

By the way McCoy I just won $5000.00 betting that you would launch yet
another tirade against Stewart.


But you made yourself look like a complete loser.


Feel welcome to collect the 5 grand.


Exactly what contributions to tube craft are you going to make?


I call this individual 'nob' because he appears to be as stupid as a
doorknob.

He is a well-known preference basher and sycophant on r.a.o. My
prediction is that his 'contribution' to tubecraft will be to advise
any and all who will listen to him to conduct double-blind tests on
their audio components. He has, by all accounts, never performed one
himself, but that will not stop him from proselytizing.

If your preferences do not match his, you probably have hearing issues.

Best to ignore nob, lest his idiocy spill over to your group.


Thanks, Shhhh! Unfortunately Mickey McMickey, or Nob as you call him,
is depressingly familiar to us. I call him Nyobe, Queen of Ignorance
and Disease, and Patrick refers to him a MeKelpie, a Kelpie being a
particularly fine breed of New Zealand sheep dog, to account for
McKelvy's supine sycophancy. (It's an insult to Kelpies, which are
intelligent dogs, to compare Nob to them.)

It should not surprise anyone that Mike KcKelvy is an arselicker for
Krueger and Pinkerton. For a living he sells "consumer units, hi-fi" to
unsuspecting passers-by in a mall. If everyone wanted real hi-fi,
MeKelpie would be out of a job.

Doesn't excuse his stupidity, I know, but I just thought I'd get the
extenuating circumstances on the record, make myself look like a
tolerant, Christian, liberal sorta guy, even about a subhuman throwback
like Nob.

Andre Jute

PS I noticed Patrick writing to MeKelpie, but what has MeKelpie done to
deserve that honor? Basically the guy's a waste of skin and oxygen; he
doesn't deserve to have Patrick helping him with whatever his problem
is. I'm surprised Patrick even reads MeKelpie's sub-moronic witterings.


I don't read or reply to everything on the news group.
I try to hold as few grudges against ppl as possible, and just say what i
think.
I would say its a while since I wrote of the MeKelpie dog issue, it was
humerous at the time...
Maybe i just don't have too many ppl telling me I am a jerk too often so i
don't have any
real personal angst with those others here who may think some i talk to are
intellectually
defective or objectionable.

I am just too busy to take much interest in the discussions at present....

Its really a pity that 95% of the posts are about personal issues about which I
care little.

I am presently re-typing my website for those really interested in making tube
operated gear.

I don't really give a damn if the usernet group ppl have hung up their
soldering irons.

Many others who wouldn't dare hang out here at r.a.t might find the new site of
interest
when I complete re-furbishment within a few weeks.
I am up to nearly 8Mb so far.

Why is there so much bickering here? why can't you guys stay busy with being
creative?
methinks the devil makes work for idle minds and hands.

I foresee that discussions about tubecraft at r.a.t will decline further.
Fortunately, ppl elsewhere are building gear, or wanting to, and I am always
available to help them if they are willing to work at helping themselves by
reading
informative books, websites, and raising a sweat in their workshops, and if
they would only ever rarely
get involved in the personal ****e fights that continue on and on.

Right now I really don't need to be in this news group.

The archives may be searched for answers to 1,001 questions raised over the
last 5 years.

Whatever i may say might be just repetition.

Patrick Turner.



dave weil March 4th 06 03:02 PM

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 23:29:52 GMT, wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:12:02 GMT, wrote:

How would you know that an amp NOT YET BUILT would sound "****ty"?

Because it was an SET.


Can you give us the names of the last 10 SETs that you've listened to?


I could, but then I'd have to kill you.
Besides, one POS amp is enough, or are you telling me that there are SET
amps that can play at normal levels without massive distortion?


OK, how about even one SET that you have sampled? It would be nice to
know the associated gear (especially speakers) and what kind of music
you listened to. Quoting from any on-the-spot notes that you made
would be nice, but you can use your memory if you'd like. It would be
nice to hear what specifically bothered you about the sound.

BTW, are you telling me that if I listened to a single SS amp, like,
say a Phase Linear amp, I'd be able to condemn the whole species?
Because that's what you seem to be saying, that one can extrapolate
from a single example.




Jon Yaeger March 4th 06 04:57 PM

WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY IS A LIAR
 
Arguing like this over the internet is like participating in the Special
Olympics. After you've given it your best shot, you're still retarded!


Stewart Pinkerton March 4th 06 05:55 PM

WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY IS A LIAR
 
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:57:23 -0500, Jon Yaeger
wrote:

Arguing like this over the internet is like participating in the Special
Olympics. After you've given it your best shot, you're still retarded!


Interesting that you should choose that particular analogy. Special
Olympics shooters and archers would do pretty well in the 'normal'
Olympics. BTW, participation in those Games does not imply brain
damage - were you hoping to qualify just on that account?

--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

George M. Middius March 4th 06 06:06 PM

WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY IS A LIAR
 



Stewèd Pukerton said:

participation in [the Special Olympics] does not imply brain
damage - were you hoping to qualify just on that account?


For anybody who's unfamiliar with Stewie's routines, this is a coded
message that means he's just cracked open a bottle of whiskeeey.






March 4th 06 08:32 PM

Bug Eater vs. humanity
 

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...



Mickey McMickey said:

It's when people say things like SET's are great sounding amps.
Or CD players have gigantic differences in sound quality, that
will get [the Krooborg's] attention.


The sad thing, Mickey, is that you're entirely serious. You really and
truly
believe that for somebody to like the sound of certain amps (the ones you
hate), or to prefer one CD player over another, is "wrong".

Wrong is a moral concept, there is nothing "wrong" with preferring the sound
of distortion, it just doesn't make good sense for them to claim it's more
"musical."


If Noah were loading up his ark today, he'd look at you and Arnii and say,
"No, boys, you can stay here and drown. We don't need any walking, talking
turds."


And then he'd flush your cloven footed ****ty self.



Sander deWaal March 4th 06 08:35 PM

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
 
said:

If one adds the line "In my opinion", or "just speaking for myself" ,
one is almost certain to be attacked for saying that by Arny Krueger.


Oh well, damned if you do, damned if you don't.



Actually, that's the best way to keep Arny from bothering with you at all.
It's when people say things like SET's are great sounding amps. Or CD
players have gigantic differences in sound quality, that will get his
attention.



See:
http://groups.google.nl/group/rec.au...5cb7e03aa27c90

Quote:
__________________________________________________ ____________

Me:

However, those are just my observations.



Arny:

Which you'll repeat early and often in the hope that they will
convince...
__________________________________________________ ____________

End Quote



I think that you know as well as anybody, that Stewart, while not exactly
shy about expressing his opinions, (as if that were strange around here) is
in fact a well qualified EE.




Quote:
__________________________________________________ ____________

Me:

Pinkerton gets not nearly as much attacked as Arny, and
to be honest, I think that Pinkerton is a lot better
versed in electronics on a component level.



Arny:

I don't think you're qualified to judge either of us, Sander.


Me:

That, and he has a kind of humour that I can appreciate.



Arny:

You obviously tolerate racist comments well.
__________________________________________________ ____________

End Quote



--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk