Is this too mellow?
 

"Laurence Payne" wrote in message

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:26:28 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

With the level of musicians that I work, I would suspect
that less than a third of the adults and almost none of
the children know what Grove's is.

Wake up, Arny! You're not talking to them, you're
talking to us.

And your whining proves that you exactly understood what I said, but are on
yet another one of your pedantic binges.

Binge on, dude! ;-)

Is this too mellow?
 

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:58:54 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

The ability of certain members of this forum to ignore reliable references
is well-known. Since they have backed up many of my opinons in the past, the
futility of expecting any real change around here is pretty obvious.

I don't understand a word of that. YOU'RE ignoring the accepted
definitions of certain terms. "Backed up"? Eh?



You ain't my daddies, Laurence, Kitty, Iain.
Oh yes I am! :-)

Is this too mellow?
 

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:48:12 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote:

BTW Humans can also 'hear' "frequencies as low as 0.1 Hz". All this
requires is for the pressure variations to be large enough to be sensed and
to allow for the sensation in your ears to qualify as 'hear'.

Interesting to discuss whether "hear" is the right term. Do we "see"
infra-red?

Is this too mellow?
 

"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:48:12 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote:

BTW Humans can also 'hear' "frequencies as low as 0.1 Hz". All this
requires is for the pressure variations to be large enough to be sensed
and
to allow for the sensation in your ears to qualify as 'hear'.

Interesting to discuss whether "hear" is the right term.

That's probably why Jim put it in quotes.

Do we "see"
infra-red?

No, nor can we sense it with our eyes. If you sense IR at all it is only
because of the warming effect it has on the skin. OTOH you can be aware of
air-borne infra-bass because the air-movements are detected by the eardrum.
Certainly the sensation is quite different from normal hearing, but then we
don't know what it "sounds" like to a pigeon either :-)

David.

Is this too mellow?
 

Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article ,
bcoombes

BTW Pigeons can hear frequencies as low as .1 Hz, or one vibration every
ten seconds, so if any of the peeps reading this is a pigeon that
statement is miles out.

BTW Humans can also 'hear' "frequencies as low as 0.1 Hz". All this
requires is for the pressure variations to be large enough

I guess that's why the Lord Mayor of Hiroshima said "What the f**k was that".

BTW2 Can you give me a reference for what you say about pigeons? I can
check my own observation from having sensed such changes. But I'm not a
pigeon. (Honest!) :-)

Tis here, it's a really interesting page.[I thought, maybe I'm easily entertained].
http://www.philtulga.com/MSSActivities.html

Above said, it isn't clear to me what relevance it would have for something
like recordings or broadcasts of music/speech.

Non whatsoever, that I can think of...but there are more things under heaven and
earth etc..

--
Bill Coombes

Is this too mellow?
 

In article , David Looser
wrote:
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:48:12 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote:

BTW Humans can also 'hear' "frequencies as low as 0.1 Hz". All this
requires is for the pressure variations to be large enough to be
sensed and to allow for the sensation in your ears to qualify as
'hear'.

Interesting to discuss whether "hear" is the right term.

That's probably why Jim put it in quotes.

Yes.

Do we "see" infra-red?

No, nor can we sense it with our eyes.

Not quite correct. I can certainly 'sense' infrared with my 'eyes'. But the
sensation of dryness and soreness of the front of my eyes. I think it may
be due to evaporation when my eyes are exposed to significant heat sources.
e.g. when making toast in the morning even though the flames of the grill
aren't directly visible.


If you sense IR at all it is only because of the warming effect it has
on the skin.

And, in my experience on the eyes.

OTOH you can be aware of air-borne infra-bass because the
air-movements are detected by the eardrum. Certainly the sensation is
quite different from normal hearing, but then we don't know what it
"sounds" like to a pigeon either :-)

Indeed. Mind you, I don't know what music "sounds like" to *you*, either!
;-

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

Is this too mellow?
 

"bcoombes" bcoombes@orangedotnet wrote in message
o.uk
Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article
, bcoombes

BTW Pigeons can hear frequencies as low as .1 Hz, or
one vibration every ten seconds, so if any of the peeps
reading this is a pigeon that statement is miles out.

BTW Humans can also 'hear' "frequencies as low as 0.1
Hz". All this requires is for the pressure variations to
be large enough

I guess that's why the Lord Mayor of Hiroshima said "What
the f**k was that".

That's an exact quote - you're sure about it?

A little research suggests that there may not have even been such a person
in 1945. That he exists now is questionable evidence since the city and
country were so profoundly reorgainzed after WW2 and back-to-back near-total
destruction by both The Bomb and a massive hurricane.

BTW2 Can you give me a reference for what you say about
pigeons? I can check my own observation from having
sensed such changes. But I'm not a pigeon. (Honest!) :-)

Tis here, it's a really interesting page.[I thought,
maybe I'm easily entertained].
http://www.philtulga.com/MSSActivities.html
Above said, it isn't clear to me what relevance it would
have for something like recordings or broadcasts of
music/speech.

Non whatsoever, that I can think of...but there are more
things under heaven and earth etc..

I was thinking that not-infrequent generators of strong subsonic waves
could include improperly designed or operated petroleum processing plants...
:-(

Is this too mellow?
 

In article ,
bcoombes
bcoombes@orangedotnet wrote:
Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article ,
bcoombes

BTW Pigeons can hear frequencies as low as .1 Hz, or one vibration
every ten seconds, so if any of the peeps reading this is a pigeon
that statement is miles out.

BTW Humans can also 'hear' "frequencies as low as 0.1 Hz". All this
requires is for the pressure variations to be large enough

I guess that's why the Lord Mayor of Hiroshima said "What the f**k was
that".

I suspect he didn't get to the end of the sentence!

However any 'bang' near the explosion would have been a blast wave, so
contained a wide range of frequencies, not just ULF. That said, such waves
do tend to be dispersive so tend to be more like LF at large distances.

I can recall having some pressure sensors at my old Uni (QMC as was) that
used to show a gentle variation in air pressure a few times per day. Was
eventually identified as the remains of the shockwave of Concorde flying
across the Atlantic. Much quieter than the noise it made over the NPL,
though. :-)

And that was much quieter than standing near to 001 as she wound up at
Tolouse. 8-] That and some tests with a tank (Challenger II IIRC) were
the loudest noise sources I've ever risked my own ears on.

BTW2 Can you give me a reference for what you say about pigeons? I can
check my own observation from having sensed such changes. But I'm not
a pigeon. (Honest!) :-)

Tis here, it's a really interesting page.[I thought, maybe I'm easily
entertained]. http://www.philtulga.com/MSSActivities.html

Ta.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

Is this too mellow?
 

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:32:21 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

I've got one of these, and find it makes rather boring
recordings, (if that's understandable :-) Is it a
favourite of yours?
Let's put it this way, for me the NT4 is a tool of
commerce.
Well, at least you're doing SOME paying work :-)

I'd love to hear some short examples.
I've said what I'm going to say about that until there's
real change around here.
I don't think there will be, until you display some
results to back up all your opinions.

The ability of certain members of this forum to ignore reliable references
is well-known. Since they have backed up many of my opinons in the past, the
futility of expecting any real change around here is pretty obvious.

You ain't my daddies, Laurence, Kitty, Iain.





Do we have to provide DNA samples to have that officialised...??

Is this too mellow?
 

"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:26:28 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

With the level of musicians that I work, I would suspect that less than a
third of the adults and almost none of the children know what Grove's is.

Wake up, Arny! You're not talking to them, you're talking to us.
Appropriate language gets your meaning across in both cases.

It's been too easy for Arny - pulling the wool over the
eyes of the goodly Baptist bretheren for a very long
time. He preys upon their lack of knowledge and
experience

It doesn't work in the real world:-)