A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

PC Speakers



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old February 5th 05, 04:11 PM posted to alt.radio.digital,uk.rec.audio
Stu Dapples
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default PC Speakers


"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message
...
Could anybody recommend any (mains-powered) PC speakers? I plan to use
them with an MP3 player in my kitchen instead of a radio.


LOL oh dear me, my poor aching sides.
Mr Sad Jobless and Lonely very cleverly thinks up something lateish on a
Friday which will create rather a lot of opinion, so he'll have something to
do at the weekend. And it worked didn't it, you got a lot of NG time out of
this one. Has it been better fun than feeding ducks and pigeons in the park?





  #62 (permalink)  
Old February 5th 05, 04:18 PM posted to alt.radio.digital,uk.rec.audio
DAB sounds worse than FM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 135
Default PC Speakers

Tim S Kemp wrote:
You're the one whining about the quality of DAB when it provides
more than just an alternative to FM, and provides massive enjoyment
to those who enjoy radio for its content.



"Massive enjoyment"? You ought to get out more.


Tell that to the housebound OAPs whose radio is there main source of
"getting out".



No doubt. But that is not what you said originally. This is what you
said originally:

"provides massive enjoyment to those who enjoy radio for its content."

and I'd say that the percentage of the population who "enjoy radio for
its content" is far higher than the percentage of the population who
aare housebound OAPs.


Me, I have a DAB receiver purely to get local radio
reports on cold school mornings



What, don't you get decent local FM reception? Do you live underground?


so I don't got and do the school run
without need,



I've told you befo don't inhale butane when posting to Usenet; you
just get your sentences all mixed up.


that and it gives me good R3 / R4 for background when
working at home, and the kids like Smash Hits



Are parenting classes available in your area?


No-one with a kitchen radio as there main source of entertainment
(and there are plenty) uses it for the sound quality,



Are you *so* stupid to think that the complaints have ever had
anything to do with kitchen radios?


Ahhh right, so the Evoke 1 that you're whining about the SQ of is the
rare Evoke 1 Hi-Fi seperate tuner model. Now I understand, sorry I
thought it was the "portable kitchen radio" model.



It is the portable Evoke radio.


The audio quality on portable radios is extremely limited, and the
issue is about the audio quality on separates systems,
micro/midi/mini systems, car stereos and personal radios.


Audio quality on personal FM is restricted by antenna.



My FM reception cosists of a half-wave dipole (cost £15) in my bedroom
in a 1st floor flat. Have a listen to these recordings I've made of
Radios 1, 2, 3 and 4 on he

http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/di...es.htm#samples

Are they restricted by antenna? If so, how?


Car FM by road
noise and reception difficulties



How puny is your car stereo such that by turning it up a bit it doesn't
drown out the road and engine noise? Or do you drive with your window
permanently open?


, micro/mini/midi - don't get me
started.



Are you denying that cheap (but not the absolute cheapest -- you can get
them for as little as £40) micro systems sound a hell of a lot better
than they used to do. As I said, I bought a Sony micro system for my
nieces, and on FM it sounded excellent for the money. No hiss
whatsoever.


Seperates, yes, I'll agree a good FM tuner with a good
outdoor antenna



Ah, there you go; it's got to be outdoors. Outdoors is best, but I get
the feeling that you live in some FM blackspot, but I'm afraid that the
vast majority of people don't live in FM blackspots.


is the best way to listen to R4, but other than that
DAB is good enough.
The fact that the vast majority of DAB receivers sold today are
portable radios is irrelevant to the bigger picture, which is that
DAB is meant to take over from FM and be the source of radio
listening on the types of devices I've just mentioned.


And of course most FM listening is.... not seperate HiFi Tuner with
outdoor antenna type stuff.



There you go again.


DAB provides more choice of content.



... at lower audio quality than FM, Freeview, digital satellite,
cable and thousands of broadband internet radio stations....


Ooooh right - and lest we forget that Freeview needs a TV license,



I don't know what percentage of households have a TV, but I reckon it's
over 95%. So it's not a problem.


digital sat needs a dish



So?


, cable / broadband need a subscription.



Again, people aren't likely to get cable or broadband just to get radio,
but because it's there then it's a feasible option for those with these
systems. Did you know there's now 6m homes with broadband and it's
rising very rapidly?


DAB is pretty cheap from the users point of view - 50 quid for a
receiver
with amp and speaker built in....



As I've said, this is for a portable radio and the audio quality on a
portable radio is limited, and it's not an issue. It is an issue for the
other radio receiver types.


Radio 3 sounds better on FM than on DAB, so the best thing you can
get him for Christmas is the installation of an external FM aerial.


Dammit - then I'll have to get him a radio with an outdoor antenna
socket, and wire it all over the house. No. I'll get him DAB.



His loss then.


- hopefully he'll have learned how to use the CD player I
got two years ago by then).
Many people don't have Hi-Fi or give a toss about Hi-Fi,



The vast majority of people do have a hi-fi system, even if they're
only micro systems. Have you actually heard any of the more recent
micro systems? I bought my nieces a Sony micro system for about £115
and it sounds remarkably good for the money.


Yes, I have a Panasonic one (250 quid) in my bedroom. It's great for
the convenience (and a step up from a clock radio)



A step up from a clock radio? This is one of the things I detest about
pro-low audio quality on DAB people: they have to spin at every
opportunity. Basically, the facts are all against you, so you're forced
to spin to justify your support of this low audio quality system.
Pathetic.


but it's only
benefit is size, not value. It plays minidiscs - you know, the ones
that sound worse than CDs.



Hahahaha. Are you *seriously* trying to use an analogy that MDs don't
sound as good as CDs so it's acceptable for DAB to sound a bit worse
than CDs? Newsflash: the audio quality achievable on an MD wipes the
floor with the audio quality on 128kbps DAB music stations. If you
disagree, get your ears syringed.


or have
satellite TV, or even watch any more than the basic FTV channels on
telly, so DAB is definitely the best route for them if they are in
coverage.



In Ofcom's quarterly summary in October 2004, they showed that 28.8%
of all adults had listened to digital radio via digital TV, which,
when considering that 56% of the population have digital TV means
that about 50% have listened to digital radio via digital TV. It's
predicted that 80% of the UK population will have digital TV by
2008, so if the proportion of people that have listened to digital
radio via digital TV is the same in 2008 then 40% of the adult
population will have listened via digital TV by 2008, which is about
19 million adults. And obviously by 2012 when analogue TV is
switched off then it should be at least 24 million adults.


My parents watch so little TV that they are thinking of getting rid,
not going digital.



Your parents are irrelevant. We're talking about macro behaviour, not
ultra-micro individual behaviour.


Hopefully, DAB will remain a system only used for portable radios,
but that is not the intent of the broadcasters.


Easy tuning, good sound,



Listen to any commercial music radio station, Radios 1 & 2, 1Xtra
and 6 Music, and that is anything but "good sound".


Subjective.



Subjective? What, that Radios 1 & 2, 1Xtra and 6 Music don't sound good?
You do need your ears syringing.

It is funny though, you even came out with the classic: you feed your
DAB receiver through your DAC!!!!! Fantastic.

DAB is the weakest link, goodbye.



--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Find the cheapest Freeview, DAB & MP3 Player Prices:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/fr..._receivers.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...tal_radios.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...rs_1GB-5GB.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...e_capacity.htm


  #63 (permalink)  
Old February 5th 05, 04:22 PM posted to alt.radio.digital,uk.rec.audio
Fleetie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 449
Default PC Speakers

"Wally" wrote
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message

What price are you talking about, though? El cheapo PC speakers sound
crap, but they're less than a bloody tenner. If I buy some for, say,
£25 - £40, I'd expect them to sound a hell of a lot better than the ones
that cost less than a tenner, hence the reason I started this sodding
thread: to ascertain which PC speakers don't sound too bad.


Then what are your criteria for "don't sound too bad"? What does that
actually *mean*? I've got a 30 quid set of powered PC speakers - two
satellites and a bass box. Got 'em in Asda/Currys/Gawdknows about a year
ago. Last I saw, they were down to 25 quid.

I didn't review them first, and I didn't take advice on which pile of cheap
**** was better than some other pile of cheap ****. I just blew the whole 30
quid and took a massive gamble! Oh my god! What a chancer I am!! Thirty
whole ****ing quid on unheard cheap-**** speakers!! I'm mad, I tell you,
stark, raving mad!! I should have spent years researching the subject in the
hope of determining whether feeding **** into **** sounds substantally worse
than feeding quality into ****! Just like you are now. For the benefit of
the most retentive pedant we've had for a while, here's my 'official'
response to your query...


Ha ha! Trevor Wilson is still berating me under his breath for risking
350 of my ill-gotten on Ebay for a cheap Chinese v*lve amp. I must be out
of my brilliant mind. Funily enough, I'm still listening to it. (Cos I have
no money for a Krell, admittedly, but even if I did buy one, I'd hang onto
the valve amp.)


Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890
Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk


  #64 (permalink)  
Old February 5th 05, 04:26 PM posted to alt.radio.digital,uk.rec.audio
DAB sounds worse than FM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 135
Default PC Speakers

Tim S Kemp wrote:
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:

What price are you talking about, though? El cheapo PC speakers sound
crap, but they're less than a bloody tenner. If I buy some for, say,
£25 - £40, I'd expect them to sound a hell of a lot better than the
ones that cost less than a tenner, hence the reason I started this
sodding thread: to ascertain which PC speakers don't sound too bad.


To answer your thread- in the medium price bracket I find the
creative 2.1 type sets are best value for money (and yes, I do use a
lot of PC speakers)



People like you bemuse me, because you've said you've got a DAC, so I
presume you've got a relatively expensive separates hi-fi system, and
yet you now say you use PC speakers a lot. I'm with Stewart Pinkerton
(who I was needlessly off-hand to before): why don't you get a sub-£200
system to listen to when you're working on your PC?


http://www.dabs.com/uk/channels/hard...quicklinx=3FY7
would probably do you fine.



Right, thanks. I haven't got the space for the subwoofer though (I could
probably put it in a cupboard, but it'd probably make the dishes
rattle). What would it be like without the sub?


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Find the cheapest Freeview, DAB & MP3 Player Prices:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/fr..._receivers.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...tal_radios.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...rs_1GB-5GB.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...e_capacity.htm


  #65 (permalink)  
Old February 5th 05, 04:36 PM posted to alt.radio.digital,uk.rec.audio
DAB sounds worse than FM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 135
Default PC Speakers


"Wally" wrote
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message

What price are you talking about, though? El cheapo PC speakers
sound crap, but they're less than a bloody tenner. If I buy some
for, say, £25 - £40, I'd expect them to sound a hell of a lot
better than the ones that cost less than a tenner, hence the reason
I started this sodding thread: to ascertain which PC speakers don't
sound too bad.


Then what are your criteria for "don't sound too bad"? What does that
actually *mean*? I've got a 30 quid set of powered PC speakers - two
satellites and a bass box. Got 'em in Asda/Currys/Gawdknows about a
year ago. Last I saw, they were down to 25 quid.

I didn't review them first, and I didn't take advice on which pile
of cheap **** was better than some other pile of cheap ****. I just
blew the whole 30 quid and took a massive gamble! Oh my god! What a
chancer I am!! Thirty whole ****ing quid on unheard cheap-****
speakers!! I'm mad, I tell you, stark, raving mad!!



No, you're a sarcastic, Scottish bore with a ****e Christian name. No
more, no less.


I should have
spent years researching the subject in the hope of determining
whether feeding **** into **** sounds substantally worse than
feeding quality into ****! Just like you are now.



Feeding quality into ****? Are you referring to DAB through a portable
radio (that's what I'm doing at the moment in my kitchen)? If so, then
you clearly haven't got a clue what you're talking about, because that
is undoubtedly feeding **** into ****. If you disagree, get your ears
syringed.


For the benefit of
the most retentive pedant



Pedant? Eh?


we've had for a while, here's my
'official' response to your query...



Oh well, I'll never see your official response, because I've added your
email address to my Blocked Senders List.



--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Find the cheapest Freeview, DAB & MP3 Player Prices:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/fr..._receivers.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...tal_radios.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...rs_1GB-5GB.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...e_capacity.htm


  #66 (permalink)  
Old February 5th 05, 04:38 PM posted to alt.radio.digital,uk.rec.audio
DAB sounds worse than FM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 135
Default PC Speakers

Stu Dapples wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message
...
Could anybody recommend any (mains-powered) PC speakers? I plan to
use them with an MP3 player in my kitchen instead of a radio.


LOL oh dear me, my poor aching sides.
Mr Sad Jobless and Lonely very cleverly thinks up something lateish
on a Friday which will create rather a lot of opinion, so he'll have
something to do at the weekend. And it worked didn't it, you got a
lot of NG time out of this one. Has it been better fun than feeding
ducks and pigeons in the park?



Awww, it's old Stupot. Still a buffoon as ever.

Ta-ra.


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Find the cheapest Freeview, DAB & MP3 Player Prices:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/fr..._receivers.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...tal_radios.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...rs_1GB-5GB.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...e_capacity.htm


  #67 (permalink)  
Old February 5th 05, 04:42 PM posted to alt.radio.digital,uk.rec.audio
DAB sounds worse than FM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 135
Default PC Speakers

Stu Dapples wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message
...
Could anybody recommend any (mains-powered) PC speakers? I plan to
use them with an MP3 player in my kitchen instead of a radio.


LOL oh dear me, my poor aching sides.
Mr Sad Jobless and Lonely very cleverly thinks up something lateish
on a Friday which will create rather a lot of opinion



Just to answer this: I actually want to buy some PC speakers. Heaven
forbid that I should ask for any recommendations at 3.34pm on a Friday.
I won't do it again.


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Find the cheapest Freeview, DAB & MP3 Player Prices:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/fr..._receivers.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...tal_radios.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...rs_1GB-5GB.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...e_capacity.htm


  #68 (permalink)  
Old February 5th 05, 04:44 PM posted to alt.radio.digital,uk.rec.audio
DAB sounds worse than FM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 135
Default PC Speakers

Tim S Kemp wrote:
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
Tim S Kemp wrote:
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:

You really need to get out more.

Hello, My name is Kettle, good to meet you Pot. You may call me
Black.



I'd love to be going out more, it's just my bank account that won't
let me.


You're the one who wasted his money on a DAB radio he doesn't like. I
spent mine on one I use and enjoy.



The Evoke-1 cost me £40, and I'll probably sell it on ebay to some
unsuspecting mug for £75 or so. So it's not really wasted money. I do,
however, enjoy listening to digital radio via Freeview, and that didn't
cost much, and you get TV on it.


--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info

Find the cheapest Freeview, DAB & MP3 Player Prices:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/fr..._receivers.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...tal_radios.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...rs_1GB-5GB.htm
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/mp...e_capacity.htm


  #69 (permalink)  
Old February 5th 05, 05:04 PM posted to alt.radio.digital,uk.rec.audio
Wally
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default PC Speakers

"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote in message

No, you're a sarcastic, Scottish bore with a ****e Christian name. No
more, no less.


No, I'm trolling the hide off an arrogant ****wit.


Feeding quality into ****? Are you referring to DAB through a portable
radio (that's what I'm doing at the moment in my kitchen)?


Are you thick? I know that's what you're doing at present - you already said
so. For some reason, you think that feeding a decent signal (high bitrate
MP3) into **** is somehow going to be better. If you know this, then why are
in here asking about it? I mean, you must have already spent time listening
to decent signals going through ****ty little PC speakers, to know that this
is worth pursuing - and if you've already listened to such, then you don't
need to ask about it!


we've had for a while, here's my
'official' response to your query...


Oh well, I'll never see your official response, because I've added your
email address to my Blocked Senders List.


Ooh!! I'm breakin' me 'eart, so I am! It's properly called a killfile, rube.




  #70 (permalink)  
Old February 5th 05, 05:19 PM posted to alt.radio.digital,uk.rec.audio
Wally
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default PC Speakers

"Fleetie" wrote in message news:kh7Nd.732

Ha ha! Trevor Wilson is still berating me under his breath for risking
350 of my ill-gotten on Ebay for a cheap Chinese v*lve amp.


Sometimes, you have to take your chances.


I must be out
of my brilliant mind. Funily enough, I'm still listening to it. (Cos I

have
no money for a Krell, admittedly, but even if I did buy one, I'd hang onto
the valve amp.)


I haven't plugged in my valve amp since I got my first Cyrus II a few weeks
ago (I'm collecting them). I keep meaning to give it whirl to see how they
compare - always felt the valve jobbie was very good when kept within its
power limits. Certainly too close to call, going from memory; my initial
impression of the Cyrus was maybe slightly tighter bass, but it's hard to be
sure because of the extra power.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.