![]() |
Cognitive dissonance?
Laurence Payne wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:10:29 -0000, "Keith G" wrote: I know which one sounds best because I know what they cost Shouldn't there be a smiley after that? :-) No, cognitive dissonance doesn't work that way. -- Bill Coombes |
Cognitive dissonance?
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:10:29 -0000, "Keith G" wrote: I know which one sounds best because I know what they cost Shouldn't there be a smilie after that? :-) No need, there was a '(see Subject Line!)' instead. |
Cognitive dissonance?
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:10:29 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote: OK, OK - one of the mics is a dinky little Neumann TLM102 which arrived today: http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/shown...mannTLM102.jpg The other is my trusty Oktava MK-319. http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/shown...ktavaMK319.jpg Both aimed primarily to flatter vocals, I think? I'd be interested to hear them doing that job. Got anything? Now, rather than putting them (and the clarinet) under the microscope, how about trying for the BEST sound you can get from each? I'd also be fascinated to hear a two-channel recording (if I said "stereo" I'd quite rightly be shouted down :-) using the pair of them, spaced a few inches apart, at least a foot in front of the clarinet. The trombone will have to wait until I retire. I'd get no pleasure from playing it badly, and I know how much regular commitment it takes to play it well. Speaking of which, last summer I sat in with this lot http://www.oompahband.com/home.html when they were short of an accordion player for a few gigs (I did it on keyboard. And yes, I did get to wear the blonde wig. Search for me on Facebook if you want proof.) The point being, their trombone player was EXCELLENT. Not, mind you, that he was doing anything a flute couldn't ... :-) |
Cognitive dissonance?
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... Look at this: http://www.auym23.dsl.pipex.com/show/show.html Same bit of music on mics A and B. The only way I can explain such a discrepancy in the volume envelopes is if the mics were MUCH too close to the clarinet. That would explain the excessive key noise too. I don't think they were, but ideal pacement isn't possible when you have two mic stands trying to occupy the the same spot. I've made my choice of mics for now and will be experimenting (in a slapdash, careless, slack-arsed, *hobbyist* kind of way) to find the 'sweet spot' for both the clarinet and the sax - in those recordings, one morphed into the other while I was having a bit of a nap, earlier on! I'm going to have to go again for the piano when we get the buzz sorted out. Want to try again with the mics at least a couple of feet back? That might give something more meaningful. No, that's done and dusted now - counting an offlist 'vote' (Iain, right on the money, as you might expect) and you as an A, I take it I've got 3 As and 1 B so far! ?? ;-) |
Cognitive dissonance?
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:10:29 -0000, "Keith G" wrote: OK, OK - one of the mics is a dinky little Neumann TLM102 which arrived today: http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/shown...mannTLM102.jpg The other is my trusty Oktava MK-319. http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/shown...ktavaMK319.jpg Both aimed primarily to flatter vocals, I think? What the 'sounds like ****' 6 kHz lift? :-) I'd be interested to hear them doing that job. Got anything? No. Now, rather than putting them (and the clarinet) under the microscope, how about trying for the BEST sound you can get from each? I'd also be fascinated to hear a two-channel recording (if I said "stereo" I'd quite rightly be shouted down :-) using the pair of them, spaced a few inches apart, at least a foot in front of the clarinet. All those recording were done as two channel recordings, I split them to make it easier for people to compare - it don't work too well hearing one mic in only one channel and then the other mic in the other channel. As they are/were wavs, I also did them as mono instead of the more-convincing (bigger) 'dual mono' which of course uses more webspace. The trombone will have to wait until I retire. I'd get no pleasure from playing it badly, and I know how much regular commitment it takes to play it well. Hmm... We're talking about the UKRAinian All Stars here - sinners, beginners, learners and sundry other low-wage earners, not the bloody Philharmonic!! Speaking of which, last summer I sat in with this lot http://www.oompahband.com/home.html when they were short of an accordion player for a few gigs (I did it on keyboard. OK, keyboard then? And yes, I did get to wear the blonde wig. Search for me on Facebook if you want proof.) Facebook? The point being, their trombone player was EXCELLENT. Not, mind you, that he was doing anything a flute couldn't ... :-) :-) |
Cognitive dissonance?
"Keith G" wrote We're talking about the UKRAinian All Stars here - sinners, beginners, learners and sundry other low-wage earners, not the bloody Philharmonic!! Also push a 'returners' in there where it looks best.... ;-) |
Cognitive dissonance?
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:09:33 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote: I don't think they were, but ideal pacement isn't possible when you have two mic stands trying to occupy the the same spot. I found one of these http://www.thomann.de/gb/k+m_235-50.htm very useful. Just cheap enough to dissuade me from going down to the shed and making something. Then, if you have any lingering suspicion that expensive=better, work out why this http://www.thomann.de/gb/schoeps_ums_20.htm costs so much more :-) Treat yourself to a pair of these too http://www.thomann.de/gb/the_tbone_em700_stereoset.htm You like experimenting I think? At that price, why not? They might suit the clarinet better than a large-diaphragm vocal mic. And even non-purist "stereo" gives the sound such a lift. |
Cognitive dissonance?
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:22:26 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote: We're talking about the UKRAinian All Stars here - sinners, beginners, learners and sundry other low-wage earners, not the bloody Philharmonic!! I play like crap often enough by mistake, without SETTING OUT to play like crap :-) |
Cognitive dissonance?
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:22:26 -0000, "Keith G" wrote: We're talking about the UKRAinian All Stars here - sinners, beginners, learners and sundry other low-wage earners, not the bloody Philharmonic!! I play like crap often enough by mistake, without SETTING OUT to play like crap :-) Nobody's setting out to play crap, this first effort: http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/GeorgiaM.mp3 Was indisputably the best bit of music *ever* posted here that was played and recorded only by ukra subscribers, their friends and family in no less than 3 different countries!! No? :-) |
Cognitive dissonance?
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:09:33 -0000, "Keith G" wrote: I don't think they were, but ideal pacement isn't possible when you have two mic stands trying to occupy the the same spot. I found one of these http://www.thomann.de/gb/k+m_235-50.htm very useful. Just cheap enough to dissuade me from going down to the shed and making something. Then, if you have any lingering suspicion that expensive=better, work out why this http://www.thomann.de/gb/schoeps_ums_20.htm costs so much more :-) Treat yourself to a pair of these too http://www.thomann.de/gb/the_tbone_em700_stereoset.htm Been there, done all that with a pair of very nice, factory-matched SE1A 'pencil mics'. You like experimenting I think? Yes, whenever possible I like to try stuff out for myself - in all areas, not just 'hifi' stuff. Hence dropping the dosh on a not-so-cheap Neumann mic - I already *know* they are good (or at least well-regarded by just about everybody), I just needed to hear it for myself. I already love it! :-) At that price, why not? They might suit the clarinet better than a large-diaphragm vocal mic. And even non-purist "stereo" gives the sound such a lift. Don't need or want 'stereo' - I work with only two channels in Sound Forge and need one for the backing, as in this track (mixed down to mono): http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/shown...he%20Child.wav ****e for all I know, but Swim had had that sax for less than a week at the time, IIRC and we like it! :-) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk