Dave Pigman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Arny Bollockbrain wrote:
"Dave Pigman (News)" wrote in
message

In article ,

Keith G wrote:
Ah, my mistake - there I was thinking your were wanking
on about *pro* gear in a *non-pro* newsgroup just to
impress all the dim kiddiebinks here who might know no
better! Silly old me! Wank away, boys!

Kitty yet again trying to invent his rules for this
newsgroup while ignoring all the long established ones
for Usenet in general.

Interesting that Kitty had no problems at all when it was Iain who way
talking about pro gear.

Leads you to think that maybe what sets Kitty off is who is talking, not
what is said...

Whoda thunk? ;-)

They're in the same knitting circle...

Whayhey..a genuine Dave Plowman witty comment..well almost..still not a bad
effort for a member of the 'humourless' clique.

--
Bill Coombes

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message

In article ,

Keith G wrote:
Ah, my mistake - there I was thinking your were wanking
on about *pro* gear in a *non-pro* newsgroup just to
impress all the dim kiddiebinks here who might know no
better! Silly old me! Wank away, boys!

Kitty yet again trying to invent his rules for this
newsgroup while ignoring all the long established ones
for Usenet in general.




Uh oh, the Pooch is trying to hump my leg again..!!

LOL!



Interesting that Kitty had no problems at all when it was Iain who way
talking about pro gear.

Leads you to think that maybe what sets Kitty off is who is talking, not
what is said...



Partly correct, of course - when something as OT as a tedious reference to
the *pro audio* environment in the US is posted in this Brit enthusiasts
(recreational/non-pro) audio ng, it certainly does make a difference who is
posting it.

If the poster has 'been there' and 'done that' as Iain has (well documented)
it is a case of someone mentioning their loosely relevant personal
experiences to an audience who may (or may not) be interested, but in your
case, having never worked in the recording industry or even been paid for a
recording job in your life AFAIK, your largely Googled, cut and
pasted/linked postings are no more than puerile, bombastic irrelevance.....

Grow up....

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article
, Arny
Krueger wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
Ah, my mistake - there I was thinking your were wanking
on about *pro* gear in a *non-pro* newsgroup just to
impress all the dim kiddiebinks here who might know no
better! Silly old me! Wank away, boys!
Kitty yet again trying to invent his rules for this
newsgroup while ignoring all the long established ones
for Usenet in general.
Interesting that Kitty had no problems at all when it
was Iain who way talking about pro gear.
Leads you to think that maybe what sets Kitty off is who
is talking, not what is said...
Whoda thunk? ;-)
They're in the same knitting circle...

...whose goal seems to be domination of the group, at any cost in terms of
politness or logic and reason.


You found your goat yet Arny?

--
Bill Coombes

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"bcoombes" bcoombes@orangedotnet wrote in message
o.uk
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message

In article ,

Keith G wrote:
Ah, my mistake - there I was thinking your were wanking
on about *pro* gear in a *non-pro* newsgroup just to
impress all the dim kiddiebinks here who might know no
better! Silly old me! Wank away, boys!

Kitty yet again trying to invent his rules for this
newsgroup while ignoring all the long established ones
for Usenet in general.

Interesting that Kitty had no problems at all when it
was Iain who way talking about pro gear.

Leads you to think that maybe what sets Kitty off is who
is talking, not what is said...

This from a cliquette member...Pot...kettle...etc.

Yet another example of who is talking, not what is said controlling
someone's antisocial behavoir.

Do Kitty+Combs+Iain = yet another cliquette that is determined to respond
to every post by certain people,whether they have something useful to say?




You worry too much, Anus - if you don't like what you see here, you can
always do the other thing....

There's summat a bit disgusting about a Yank *wannabee pro* who's been
thrashed out of every 'pro' and 'tech' group in Audio Usenet washing up here
all the time, trying to act like clever ****!

Nauseating, really....

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article
, Arny
Krueger wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message

In article ,

Keith G wrote:
Ah, my mistake - there I was thinking your were wanking
on about *pro* gear in a *non-pro* newsgroup just to
impress all the dim kiddiebinks here who might know no
better! Silly old me! Wank away, boys!

Kitty yet again trying to invent his rules for this
newsgroup while ignoring all the long established ones
for Usenet in general.

Interesting that Kitty had no problems at all when it
was Iain who way talking about pro gear.

Leads you to think that maybe what sets Kitty off is who
is talking, not what is said...

Whoda thunk? ;-)

They're in the same knitting circle...

...whose goal seems to be domination of the group, at any cost in terms of
politness or logic and reason.


Like a true *religious bigot*.....

Nauseating, like I say....

In article ,
Arny Krueger wrote:
They're in the same knitting circle...

...whose goal seems to be domination of the group, at any cost in terms
of politness or logic and reason.

Kitty has been like that from the very first time he appeared here. SET
valve amps, single unit speakers and vinyl were all he wanted to discuss
- and have his love of such things bolstered by acolytes. And tried to
shout down anyone who was willing to discuss such things, unless they
agreed with him. Now he's moved on to various dodgy microphones. Whatever
next.

--


Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Arny Krueger wrote:
They're in the same knitting circle...

...whose goal seems to be domination of the group, at any cost in terms
of politness or logic and reason.

Whatever next.

Arny's lost goat and it's current whereabouts...just a suggestion.

--
Bill Coombes

"Anus Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article
, Arny
Krueger wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message

In article ,

Keith G wrote:
Ah, my mistake - there I was thinking your were wanking
on about *pro* gear in a *non-pro* newsgroup just to
impress all the dim kiddiebinks here who might know no
better! Silly old me! Wank away, boys!

Kitty yet again trying to invent his rules for this
newsgroup while ignoring all the long established ones
for Usenet in general.

Interesting that Kitty had no problems at all when it
was Iain who way talking about pro gear.

Leads you to think that maybe what sets Kitty off is who
is talking, not what is said...

Whoda thunk? ;-)

They're in the same knitting circle...

...whose goal seems to be domination of the group, at any cost in terms of
politness or logic and reason.


'Domination' yew say?

You ain't 'quoite roight in th'ead' are yew, boi....??

LOL!!

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Anus Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article
, Arny
Krueger wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message

In article ,

Keith G wrote:
Ah, my mistake - there I was thinking your were wanking
on about *pro* gear in a *non-pro* newsgroup just to
impress all the dim kiddiebinks here who might know no
better! Silly old me! Wank away, boys!

Kitty yet again trying to invent his rules for this
newsgroup while ignoring all the long established ones
for Usenet in general.

Interesting that Kitty had no problems at all when it
was Iain who way talking about pro gear.

Leads you to think that maybe what sets Kitty off is who
is talking, not what is said...

Whoda thunk? ;-)

They're in the same knitting circle...

...whose goal seems to be domination of the group, at any cost in terms
of politness or logic and reason.


'Domination' yew say?

You ain't 'quoite roight in th'ead' are yew, boi....??

LOL!!



Perhaps it's time he was *****terised* whether he wants it or not.....??

:-)

Keith G wrote:

"Anus Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article
, Arny
Krueger wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message

In article ,

Keith G wrote:
Ah, my mistake - there I was thinking your were wanking
on about *pro* gear in a *non-pro* newsgroup just to
impress all the dim kiddiebinks here who might know no
better! Silly old me! Wank away, boys!

Kitty yet again trying to invent his rules for this
newsgroup while ignoring all the long established ones
for Usenet in general.

Interesting that Kitty had no problems at all when it
was Iain who way talking about pro gear.

Leads you to think that maybe what sets Kitty off is who
is talking, not what is said...

Whoda thunk? ;-)

They're in the same knitting circle...

...whose goal seems to be domination of the group, at any cost in
terms of politness or logic and reason.


'Domination' yew say?

You ain't 'quoite roight in th'ead' are yew, boi....??


Hah, he's sussed your little game. Today uk.rec.audio....tomorrow the world.

--
Bill Coombes